Follicular Transection in Strip Harvesting

Chapter

Abstract

There are various techniques at present for donor harvesting in hair transplantation. Follicular Unit Transplant (FUT), also known as strip harvesting, may be performed by multiblade harvesting or single-blade strip harvesting methods, while follicular unit extraction (FUE) may be performed by manual, motorized, or robotic methods. Transection rates in FUE remain higher (0.4–32.1%) than that of FUT surgery, where typical transection rates range from 1 to 1.9%. The transection of the hair follicle is found to produce poorer growth regardless of the level of transection, although the latter plays an important role in the follicle’s capacity to regrow. The commonest level of transection is at the lower one-third of the hair follicle, where the dermal papilla is located. Factors that increase the rate of transection include longer hair follicles and higher donor density. Understanding the factors influencing transection rate allows the surgeon to be aware of the areas at higher risk of transection. By minimizing the number of transections, a greater number of hair follicles can be preserved for both current and future transplantation.

Keywords

FUT Follicular transection Hair transplantation 

References

  1. 1.
    Harris J. Follicular unit extraction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21:375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery: 2015 Practice Census Results (http://www.ishrs.org/statistics-research.htm) p 11.
  3. 3.
    Harris J. New methodology and instrumentation for follicular unit extraction: lower follicle transection rates and expanded patient candidacy. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avram MR, Watkins SA. Robotic follicular unit extraction in hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(12):1319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernstein, Rassman. Follicular unit graft yield using three different techniques. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 2001;11(1):11–2.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pathomvanich D. Donor harvesting: a new approach to minimise transection of hair follicles. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:345–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Unger WP. Hair transplantation. 3rd ed; 1995. p. 195–212.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hwang S. Hair transplantation in East Asian males. In: Unger S, et al., editors. Hair transplantation. 5th ed. London: Informa Healthcare; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang CC, Cotsrelis G. Review of hair follicle dermal cells. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;57(1):2. 1-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ergin, Kulahci, Hamiloglu. In vivo follicular unit multiplication: is it possible to harvest an unlimited donor supply? Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:1332–26.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JC, Stough D, Haber R. Hair replacement: surgical and medical. Maryland Heights: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1996. p. 358–60.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pathomvanich D, Imagawa K. Hair restoration surgery in Asians. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 109–15.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Follicular transection rate in FUT in Asians. 15 years on. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 2017;27(1):1.6–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tykocinski A. The intruder: our perforating instrument for blunt donor area dissection. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 2011:78–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Aesthetics and Hair ClinicSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations