Advertisement

Biology of the Obligate Pollination Mutualism

Chapter
Part of the Ecological Research Monographs book series (ECOLOGICAL)

Abstract

Most zoophilous plants are adapted to attract reliable pollination agents by providing floral rewards such as nectar and pollen and by advertising their flowers with nongreen color and nonleafy odor, and facilitate pollination by protruding styles and stamens from flowers. The great diversity of angiosperm flowers is believed to be a product of coevolution and codiversification between plants and their pollinators.

Keywords

Active pollination behavior Breynia Epicephala Glochidion Gomphidium Phyllanthus Species specificity 

Literature Cited

  1. Addicott JF, Bao T (1999) Limiting the costs of mutualism: multiple modes of interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Airy Shaw HK (1978) Notes on Malesian and other Asiatic Euphorbiaceae. Kew Bull 33:25–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chakrabarty T, Gangopadhyay M (1995) The genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae) in the Indian subcontinent. J Econ Taxon Bot 19:173–234Google Scholar
  4. Chakrabarty T, Gangopadhyay M (1996) The genus Breynia (Euphorbiaceae) in the Indian subcontinent. J Econ Taxon Bot 20:501–512Google Scholar
  5. Csotonyi JT, Addicott JF (2001) Competition between mutualists: the role of differential flower abscission in yuccas. Oikos 94:557–565Google Scholar
  6. Goto R, Okamoto T, Kiers ET, Kawakita A, Kato M (2010) Selective flower abortion maintains moth cooperation in a newly discovered pollination mutualism. Ecol Lett 13:321–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Govaerts R, Frodin RG, Radcliffe-Smith A (2000) World checklist and bibliography of Euphorbiaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
  8. Holm-Nielsen LB (1979) Comments on the distribution and evolution of the genus Phyllanthus. In: Larsen K and Holm-Nielsen LB (eds) Tropical botany 277–290. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Kato M, Takimura A, Kawakita K (2003) An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:5264–5267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawakita A, Kato M (2004a) Obligate pollination mutualism in Breynia (Phyllanthaceae): further documentation of pollination mutualism involving Epicephala moths (Gracillariidae). Am J Bot 91:1319–1325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kawakita A, Kato M (2009) Repeated independent evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the Phyllantheae–Epicephala association. Proc R Soc B 276:417–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pellmyr O, Huth CJ (1994) Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richter KS, Weis AE (1995) Differential abortion in yucca. Nature 376:557–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmid M (1991) Phyllanthus. In: Morat P, Mackee HS (eds) Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et Dépendances, vol 17. Muséum national d’Histoire naturalle, Paris, pp 31–320Google Scholar
  15. Shapiro JM, Addicott JF (2003) Regulation of moth–yucca mutualisms: mortality of eggs in oviposition-induced ‘damage zones’. Ecol Lett 6:440–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Webster GL (1994) Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 81:33–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson RD, Addicott JF (1998) Regulation of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths: is oviposition behavior responsive to selective abscission of flowers? Oikos 81:109–118Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Human and Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Center for Ecological ResearchKyoto UniversityOtsuJapan

Personalised recommendations