Skip to main content

Review of the Legislation on Public Participation in EIA in China: From Disorder to Normalization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

China began to implement environment impact assessment (hereinafter referred to as EIA) in the late 1970s; however, public participation had not been introduced into EIA procedure until 10 years later. Accordingly, since the late 1990s, public participation in EIA in China started from scratch and has gone through the development process from disorder to normalization. China’s early legislation on public participation in EIA was too vague and impractical, which led to the disorder of practice in public participation in EIA. In 2006, China enacted special measures, making public participation in EIA achieve a preliminary legalization. Deep-seated problems in the practice of public participation in EIA in recent years, such as the lack of validity and authenticity of public participation, have presented new challenges for the legislation on public participation in EIA. China has begun to revise the Interim Measures, intending to resolve core issues, such as the scope of application for public participation in EIA, the criteria for how “fully” the public opinions are solicited, and the effect of public opinions, so as to improve the authenticity and validity of public participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

EIA:

Environment impact assessment

EIR:

Environmental impact report

EPL:

Environmental Protection Law

LEIA:

Law on environment impact assessment

MEP:

Ministry of Environmental Protection

NEPA:

National Environmental Policy Act

SC:

State Council

SEPA:

State Environmental Protection Administration

SETC:

State Economic and Trade Commission

SPC:

State Planning Commission

References

  • Bai GX (2011) Analysis of the justification of EIA: Take the institution of public participation as an example (环境影响评价的正当性解析——以公众参与机制为例). Journal of Political Science and Law (3): 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Focusing on Yuanmingyuan anti-seepage engineering (聚焦圆明园防渗工程) People’s Daily Online. http://env.people.com.cn/GB/8220/45856/. Accessed 1 Jan 2015

  • Jin JM (2012) Retrospect of public participation in EIA in past ten years and its future. (公众参与环境影响评价十年回眸与展望) Environmental Protection (22): 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YF (2002) Public participation in EIA (环境影响评价制度中的公众参与). Journal of China University of Geosciences (social sciences edition) (1): 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XM, Li TW (1998) Comparison of public participation in EIA in China and western countries (中西方国家环境影响评价公众参与的对比). Environmental Science (S1): 57

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Lv HJ, Liu DD (2011) Problems and countermeasures of public participation in EIA in China (中国环境影响评价中公众参与存在的问题与对策). China Population, Resources and Environment (3): 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2004) Research on public participation in EIA: Concurrent discussion on the implementation of relevant provisions in LEIA in China (环境影响评价程序之公众参与问题研究——兼论我国《环境影响评价法》相关规定的施行). Law Review (2): 117–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2006a) A comparative research on EIA institution in China and foreign countries (中外环境影响评价制度比较研究). Peking University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2006b) Environmental law (环境法学). Peking University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen TA, Hu CD (2003) Reflections on public participation in EIA (关于公众参与环境影响评价的若干思考). Present Day Law Science (1): 96

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993) Public involvement in environmental assessment: Requirements, opportunities and issues. Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update, October

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Cheng SY, Zhang YX, and Shi MM (2012) Searching for the right way from practice: Present situation and development of public participation in EIA (践中取道——公众参与环境影响评价的现状与发展). Environmental Protection (22): 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang L (2013) The EIA for one project in Qinhuangdao was inconsistent with the facts (秦皇岛一项目环评失实). People’s Daily, January 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng J (2014) Conflict and coordination of public participation in EIA for NIMBY facilities: Cite the construction project of passenger dedicated line of Beijing-Shenyang railway as an instance (论我国邻避设施环境影响评价公众参与的冲突与协调——以北京至沈阳铁路客运专线建设项目为例). Environment and Sustainable Development (5): 125

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q (2009) Shortcomings and the overcoming methods of individual participation in public decision for environmental protection (环境保护公共决策中个体参与之缺陷及其克服). Law Science (2): 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q (2015) Thoughts and advices on the perfection of public participation in EIA institution in China (我国环境影响评价公众参与制度完善的思考与建议), Environmental Protection (10): 27–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shekun Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Japan KK

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, S. (2017). Review of the Legislation on Public Participation in EIA in China: From Disorder to Normalization. In: Kitagawa, H. (eds) Environmental Policy and Governance in China. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56490-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics