Skip to main content

Actor-Centered Interest Power Analysis of Participatory Biodiversity Conservation Policy Program in and Around the Bangladeshi Sundarbans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Disaster Risk Reduction ((DRR))

Abstract

The polders and the adjacent area are the property of the Bangladesh Water Development Board. These polders have a significant role in the socio-environmental situation of the southwestern region of Bangladesh. The presence of the Sundarbans on opposite bank of the rivers makes this situation more important in terms of biodiversity context. Additionally, it is very common to find landless people as settlers along the polders in these particular regions. Although the land belongs to the state, these areas are used as common-pool resources. Hence multiple level stakeholders/actors are involved in the management of the polder areas particularly in respect of plantations. As GIZ has taken a pilot project for the conservation of biodiversity along the polder area in a participatory way, it is imperative to have a stakeholder/actor analysis in terms of interest and power in the pilot area. This study has done the complete network analysis in seven unions (Suterkhali, Rayenda, Southkhali, Ramjannagar, Munshiganj, Burigoalini, and Shyamnagar) of three upazilas (Dacope, Sarankhola, and Shyamnagar). The study found that the local government, local politicians, local beneficiaries, local elites, local NGOs, and upazila administrations are the irreplaceable stakeholders at local level. Water development board and forest administration are the two other irreplaceable actor at national level. These actors dominate the interest power network of participatory biodiversity policy program in and around Bangladeshi Sundarbans. Additionally the present co-management strategy of Bangladesh also advocates in favor of the administration-dominated institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt H (1970) On violence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, San Diego/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Devkota RR (2010) Interest and power as drivers of community forestry. Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Evart V (1998) Policy instrument: typologis and theories. In: Louice BVM, Rist RC, Evart V (eds) Carrots, sticks & sermons policy instruments and their evaluation. Transation Publishers, New Brunswick/London, pp 21–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Basic Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimble R, Wellard K (1997) Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of concepts, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agr Syst 55:173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1960) The constitution of liberty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon JW (2003) Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Addison- Wesley Educational Publishers Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krott M (2005) Forest policy analysis. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Krott M, Bader A, Schusser C, Devkota R, Maryudi A, Giessen L, Aurenhammer H (2014) Actor-centred power: the driving force in decentralized community based forest governance. Forest Policy Econ 49:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kustani A, Nugroho B, Kusmana C, Darusman D, Nurrochmat D, Krott M, Schusser C (2014) Actor, interest and conflict in sustainable mangrove forest management-a case from Indonesia. Int J Mar Sci 4(16):150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienert J, Schnetzer F, Ingold K (2013) Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. J Environ Manag 125:134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maryudi A, Devkota R, Schusser C, Yufanyi C, Salla M, Aurenhammer H, Rotchanaphatharawit R, Krott M (2012) Back to basics: considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy Econ 14(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JC (1983) Case and situational analysis. Sociol Rev 31:2 (new series)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WL (2006) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approach, 6th edn. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi A, Bodola R, Hussain SA, Hickey GM (2010) Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to Protected Areas management: the case of Corbett National Park, India. Biol Conserv 143:2956–2964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadath MN, Krott M (2012) Identifying policy change – analytical programme analysis: an example of two decades of forest policy in Bangladesh. Forest Policy Econ 25:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadath MN, Krott M (2013) Print media discourse as driver of forest policy change in Bangladesh. J Sustain Dev 6(5):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schusser C (2013) Who determines biodiversity? An analysis of actors’ power and interests in community forestry in Namibia. Forest Policy Econ 36:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schusser C, Krott M, Devkota R, Maryudi A, Salla M, Movuh MCY (2012) Sequence design of quantitative and qualitative surveys for increasing efficiency in forest policy research. AFJZ 183(3/4):75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikor T, Nguyen TO (2007) Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam’s central highlands. World Dev 35(11):2010–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg E, Iwan R, Limberg G, Moeliono M (2008) Locating social choice in forest co-management and local governance: the politics of public decision making and interests. In: Sikor T (ed) Public and private in natural resource governance: a false dichotomy? Earthscan Research Editions, London, pp 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1984) Case study research: design & methods. Sage Publication, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JC, Jordan A, Searle KR, Butler A, Chapman DS, Simmons P, Watt AD (2013) Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biol Conserv 158:359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit) for financing the research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Nazmus Sadath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Japan KK

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sadath, M.N., Schusser, C., Kabir, M.E. (2017). Actor-Centered Interest Power Analysis of Participatory Biodiversity Conservation Policy Program in and Around the Bangladeshi Sundarbans. In: DasGupta, R., Shaw, R. (eds) Participatory Mangrove Management in a Changing Climate. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56481-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics