Population Crisis

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Japanese Business and Economics book series (AJBE, volume 16)

Abstract

The Japanese population started to decline in 2008, and it is forecasted to shrink further at an increasingly rapid rate (c.f. Fig.  1.1). Moreover, the number of elderly people (above 65 years old) continues to increase. The elderly ratio, that is, the ratio of the elderly people to the total population, will peak at around 38% in 2050 before leveling out.

References

  1. Barro, R., & Becker, G. (1989). Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica, 57(2), 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G., & Barro, R. J. (1988). A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coulmas, F., Conrad, H., Schad-Seifert, A., & Vogt, G. (Eds.). (2008). The demographic challenge: A handbook about Japan. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Del Boca, D., & Vuri, D. (2007). The mismatch between employment and child care in Italy: The impact of rationing. Journal of Population Economics, 20(4), 805–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehrlich, I., & Kim, J. (2007a). Social security and demographic trends: Theory and evidence from the international experience. Review of Economic Dynamics, 10(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehrlich, I., & Kim, J. (2007b). Has social security influenced family formation and fertility in OECD countries? An economic and econometric analysis. Journal of Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law, 9, 99–120.Google Scholar
  7. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hirao, K. (2007). The privatized education market and maternal employment in Japan. In F. M. Rosenbluth (Ed.), The political economy of Japan’s low fertility. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kögel, T. (2004). Did the association between fertility and female employment with OECD countries really change its sign? Journal of Population Economics, 17, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Imrohoroglu, A., Imrohoroglu, S., & Joines, D. H. (1995). A life cycle analysis of social security. Economic Theory, 6(1), 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Myrdal, A. (1941). Nation and family: The Swedish experiment in democratic family and population policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (2014). Social security in Japan. http://www.ipss.go.jp/s-info/e/ssj2014/PDF/ssj2014.pdf.
  13. Oguro, K., Takahata, J., & Shimasawa, M. (2011). Child benefit and fiscal burden: OLG model with endogenous fertility. Modern Economy, 2, 602–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Puhakka, M., & Viren, M. (2006). The effects of the size of the public sector on fertility. Discussion Papers No. 8, Aboa Centre for Economics.Google Scholar
  15. Raymo, J., Iwasawa, M., & Bumpass, L. (2004). Marital dissolution in Japan: Recent trends and patterns. Demographic Research, 11(14), 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sachs, J. D., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (2012). Smart machines and long-term misery. NBER Working Paper, 8629.Google Scholar
  17. Takeda, H. (2005). The political economy of reproduction in Japan: Between nation-state and everyday life. RoutledgeCurzon: London; New York.Google Scholar
  18. van Groezen, B., Leers, T., & Meijdam, A. C. (2003). Social security and endogenous fertility: Pensions and child allowances as siamese twins. Journal of Public Economics, 87(2), 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yamashige, S. (2014). Population crisis and family policies in Japan. University of Tokyo Journal of Law and Politics, 11, 108–128.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International and Public PolicyHitotsubashi UniversityKunitachiJapan

Personalised recommendations