Skip to main content

Integration and Secession Under Threat of Third Region

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regional Economic Analysis of Power, Elections, and Secession

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 21))

  • 238 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we analyze mechanisms of integration and secession among several regions. In particular, we examine a three-region model using policy preference approach when there are policy conflicts among regions. By considering incentives of policy decisions in each region, we show the possibility of integration and secession and how the welfare of each region is realized through strategic determination of policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alesina, A. and E. Spolaore, 2006, “Conflict, Defence spending, and the Number of Nations,” European Economic Review, 50, 91–120.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Besley, T. and S. Coate, 2003, “Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: A political economy approach”, Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2611–2637.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolton, P. and G. Roland, 1997, “The Breakup of Nations: A Political Economy Analysis”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(Nov.), 1057–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan, J. M. and R. L. Faith, 1987, “Secession and the limits of taxation: Toward a theory of internal exit”, American Economic Review, 77 1023–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein, D. and S. O’Halloran, 1998, Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making, Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dixit, A. and M. Olson, 2002, “Does voluntary participation undermine the Coase theorem?”, Journal of Public Economics, 76, 309–335.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gradstein, M., 2004, “Political bargaining in a federation:Buchanan meets Coase”, European Economics Review, 48, 983–999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goyal, S. and K. Staal, 2006, “The political economy of regionalism,” European Economic Review, 48, 563–593.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman, G. M., 2001, Special Interest Politics, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grossman, G. M. 2002, “Constitution or Conflict,”Conflict Management and Peaece Science, 21, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Inman, R. and D. Rubinfeld, 1997, “The political economy of federalism”, In D. C. Mueller, Editor, Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laffont, J. J. and J. Tirole, 1993, A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lockwood, B., 2002, “Distributive Politics and the Benefits of decentralization”, Review of Economic Studies, 69(2), 313–338.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oates, W., 1972, Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Persson, T. and G. Tabellini, 2001, Political Economics, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Persson, T., G. Roland, and G. Tabellini, 2000, “Comparative Politics and Public Finance,” Journal of Political Economy, 108(6), 1121–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Persson, T., G. Roland, and G. Tabellini, 1999, “The Size and Scope of Government: Comparative Politics with Rational Politicians,” European Economic Review, 43(4–6), 699–735.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spolaore, E., 2007, “Civic Conflict and Secessions”, Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 9(1), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartz, T., 2002, “Representation as agency and the pork-barrel paradox”, Public Choice, 783–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moriki Hosoe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan KK

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hosoe, M. (2018). Integration and Secession Under Threat of Third Region. In: Hosoe, M. (eds) Regional Economic Analysis of Power, Elections, and Secession. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 21. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55897-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics