Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Statistics ((JSSRES))

  • 571 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces inference methods based on the models presented in previous chapters. We discuss samplers, which are required for hypothesis testing and posterior sampling. After a brief introduction of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samplers from A-hypergeometric distributions discussed in Chap. 3, we introduce a direct sampler, which allows us to draw independent samples directly from the target distribution. Gibbs partitions introduced in Chap. 2 and further discussed in Chap. 4 are related to A-hypergeometric distributions of two-rows matrices. We present some interesting topics on samplers from random partitions, including mixing assessment in terms of symmetric functions and construction of direct samplers by simulating stochastic processes on partitions. Finally, aided by information geometry, we discuss maximum likelihood estimation of curved exponential families, which arise in parameterization of the variables of A-hypergeometric distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Diaconis, P., Sturmfels, B.: Algebraic algorithms for sampling from conditional distributions. Ann. Statist. 26, 363–397 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoki, S., Hara, H., Takemura, A.: Markov Bases in Algebraic Statistics. Springer, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Mano, S.: Partition structure and the A-hypergeometric distribution associated with the rational normal curve. Electron. J. Stat. 11, 4452–4487 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Green, P.J.: Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82, 711–732 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, P.J., Richardson, S.: Modelling heterogeneity with and without the Dirichlet process. Scand. J. Statist. 28, 355–375 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Study on the Japanese National Character. http://www.ism.ac.jp/kokuminsei/en/table/index.htm

  7. Risa/Asir (Kobe distribution) Download Page. http://www.math.kobe-u.ac.jp/Asir/asir.html

  8. Goto, Y., Tachibana, Y., Takayama, N.: Implementation of difference holonomic gradient methods for two-way contingency table. Comput. Algebra Relat. Top. RIMS Kôkyûroku 2054, 11 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tachibana, Y., Goto, Y., Koyama, T., Takayama, N.: Holonomic gradient method for two way contingency tables. arXiv: 1803.04170

  10. Diaconis, P., Eisenbud, B., Sturmfels, B.: Lattice walks and primary decomposition. In: Sagan, B.E., Stanley, R.P. (eds.) Mathematical Essays in Honor of Gian-Carlo Rota (Cambridge, MA, 1996). Progress in Mathematics, vol. 161, pp. 173–193. Birkhäuser, Boston (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart, F.M.: Computer algorithm for obtaining a random set of allele frequencies for a locus in an equilibrium population. Genetics 86, 482–483 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanlon, P.: A Markov chain on the symmetric group and Jack symmetric functions. Discret. Math. 90, 123–140 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Diaconis, P., Lam, A.: A probabilistic interpretation of the Macdonald polynomials. Ann. Probab. 40, 1861–1896 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman, M.E.J., Barkema, G.T.: Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics. Clarendon Press, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Macdonald, I.G.: Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tavaré, S: Ancestral inference in population genetics In: Ecole d’Été de Probabilités de Saint Flour, Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 1837. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths, R.C., Tavaré, S.: Ancestral inference in population genetics. Statist. Sci. 9, 307–319 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Forsythe, G.E., Leibler, R.A.: Matrix inversion by the Monte Carlo method. Math. Comp. 26, 127–129 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Stephens, M., Donnelly, P.: Inference in molecular population genetics. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 62, 605–635 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. De Iorio, M., Griffiths, R.C.: Importance sampling on coalescent histories. I. Adv. Appl. Probab. 36, 417–433 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Propp, J.G., Wilson, D.B.: Exact sampling with coupled Markov chains and applications to statistical mechanics. Random Struct. Algorithms 9, 223–252 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Fearnhead, P.: Perfect simulation from population genetic models with selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 59, 263–279 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mano, S.: Ancestral graph with bias in gene conversion. J. Appl. Probab. 50, 239–255 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Liggett, T.M.: Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimizu, A.: A measure valued diffusion process describing an \(n\) locus model incorporating gene conversion. Nagoya Math. J. 119, 81–92 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Amari, S., Nagaoka, H.: Methods of Information Geometry. Translations of Mathematical Monograph vol. 191. Amer. Math. Soc. Providence (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levin, B., Reeds, J.: Compound multinomial likelihood functions are unimodal: proof of a conjecture of I.J. Good. Ann. Statist. 5, 79–87 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Keener, R., Rothman, E., Starr, N.: Distribution of partitions. Ann. Statist. 15, 1466–1481 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoshino, N.: Applying Pitman’s sampling formula to microdata disclosure risk assessment. J. Official Statist. 17, 499–520 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Takayama, N., Kuriki, S., Takemura, A.: \(A\)-hypergeometric distributions and Newton polytopes. Adv. in Appl. Math. 99, 109–133 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Baayen, R.H.: Word Frequency Distribution. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhei Mano .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mano, S. (2018). Methods for Inferences. In: Partitions, Hypergeometric Systems, and Dirichlet Processes in Statistics. SpringerBriefs in Statistics(). Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55888-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics