Co-creation of Value Through Collaboration of Government and Companies—Case Study of the Yokohama Smart City Project

  • Nobuyuki Tokoro
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)


In this chapter, I will take up the case of the Yokohama Smart City Project (YSCP), a smart city demonstration project conducted in the city of Yokohama. Implemented as one of the projects for the Next-Generation Energy and Social Systems Demonstration project sponsored by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), the project was initiated entirely by the government. In addition to the city of Yokohama, similar projects were implemented in Toyota City, Keihanna Science City, and the city of Kita Kyushu. Among these, the Yokohama City Project was the largest. A city with a population of 3.7 million people, Yokohama is renowned as one of the world’s most thriving metropolises. It also has a renowned international trade port, the Port of Yokohama, which is one of Japan’s largest commercial and industrial hubs. The Next-Generation Energy and Social Systems Demonstration aims to transform the existing metropolis into a smart city that already has infrastructure, and its main objective is to obtain various data through demonstrations. Participating in the YSCP are major companies representative of Japan such as Toshiba , Hitachi , Panasonic , Nissan Motor , TEPCO and Orix , and it is expected that new value will be created through the integration and resonance of the technologies and know-how the respective companies have.


Smart City Demand Response Social Infrastructure Energy Management System Respective Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, III: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google Scholar
  2. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Barney, J. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York, NY: Currency.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, T. (2012). Beyond smart cities: How cities network, learn and innovative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2003a). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.Google Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H. (2003b). Open innovation: How companies actually do it. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 12–14.Google Scholar
  10. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chesbrough, H. (2007). The market for innovation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 49(3), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deakin, M. (Ed.). (2014). Smart cities: Governing, modeling and analyzing the transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ghemawat, P. (1997). Games business play: Cases and models. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. R&D Management, 36(3), 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
  16. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hollands, R. (2008). Will the real smart city stand up? City, 12(3), 302–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (Eds.). (2007). Knowledge creation and management: New challenges for managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kanter, R. (1994). Collaborative advantage: Successful partnerships manage the relationship, not just the deal. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.Google Scholar
  21. Kirschbaum, R. (2005). Open innovation in practice. Research-technology management, 48(4), 24–28.Google Scholar
  22. McAfee, R. P. (2002). Competitive solutions: The strategist’s toolkit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three models. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nonaka, I. (1988). Toward middle-up-down management: Accelerating information creation. Sloan Management Review, 29(3), 57–73.Google Scholar
  27. Nonaka, I. (1994). Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow: A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. London: Palgrave macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steiner, G. A. (1969). Top management planning. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wernerfelt, B. (1995). A resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Commerce and Graduate School of Business AdministrationNihon UniversitySetagaya-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations