Advertisement

Co-creation of Value Through Initiative of a Leader Company and Collaboration of Participating Companies—Case Study of Fujisawa Sustainable Smart Town

  • Nobuyuki Tokoro
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)

Abstract

In this chapter, I will examine a smart city construction project which Panasonic , one of Japan’s major electronics manufacturers, is currently promoting in Fujisawa City in Kanagawa Prefecture. This project is based on Panasonic’s commitment under its new management strategy to provide “comprehensive solutions for the entire house, entire building, and entire town,” and Panasonic is playing the leading role in all aspects of the project from the drafting of the plans to their execution. In addition to Panasonic, however, a large number of partner companies are participating in the project. Therefore, it cannot be said that it is a 100 % Panasonic project. Furthermore, the local government of Fujisawa City is also involved in the project to some extent.

Keywords

Smart City Storage Batterie Energy Management System Kanagawa Prefecture Commercial Facility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, III: Dow Joes-Irwin.Google Scholar
  2. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, T. (2012). Beyond smart cities: How cities network, learn and innovate. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. David, G., Rob, K., & Gordon, M. (2013). Grappling with smart city politics in an era of market triumphalism. Urban Studies, 50(11), 2151–2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamel, G. (1998). Strategy innovation and quest for value. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 7–14.Google Scholar
  6. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 63–76.Google Scholar
  7. Itami, H. (1999). Management of ‘Ba’: A new management paradigm. Tokyo: NTT Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Itami, H., & Karube, M. (Eds.). (2004). Strategy and logic of invisible assets. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbun-sha.Google Scholar
  9. Itami, H., Nishiguchi, T., & Nonaka, I. (Eds.). (2000). The dynamism of ‘Ba’ and the company. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinpou-sha.Google Scholar
  10. Kanter, R. (1994). Collaborative advantage: Successful partnerships manage the relationships, not just the deal. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.Google Scholar
  11. Kodama, M. (2009). Innovation networks in knowledge-based firms: Developing ICT-based integrative competences. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Kodama, M. (2010). Boundary management: Developing business architectures for innovation. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Markides, C. (1998). Strategic innovation in established companies. Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 31–42.Google Scholar
  14. Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three models. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nishida, K. (1965). A full of collection of Kitaro Nishida’s work. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  18. Nonaka, I., & Katsumi, A. (2004). The essence of innovation. Tokyo: Nikkei BP-sha.Google Scholar
  19. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: building a foundation for knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nonaka, I., & Tokuoka, K. (Eds.). (2012). Business model innovation. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinpou-sha.Google Scholar
  22. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow: A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. London: Palgrave macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12–18.Google Scholar
  24. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experience: the next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rassia, S Th, & Pardalos, P. M. (Eds.). (2014). Cities for smart environmental and energy future: Impacts on architecture and technology. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Shimizu, H. (2000). ‘Ba’ and co-creation. Tokyo: NTT Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Shimizu, H. (2003). The concept of ‘Ba’. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  28. Steiner, G. A. (1969). Top management planning. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York, London: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  30. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Commerce and Graduate School of Business AdministrationNihon UniversitySetagaya-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations