Skip to main content

A Theoretical Framework for Relationship-Based Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Smart City and the Co-creation of Value

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Business ((BRIEFSBUSINESS))

  • 1303 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I will present a theoretical framework for the concept of acquiring a competitive edge through co-creation . As I mentioned in the first chapter, existing theories relating to competitive advantage are structured on the assumption of corporate competition, and the competitive environment has come to be perceived as conferring a competitive advantage. In this regard, the author takes the position that corporate “co-creation” confers a competitive edge. Put another way, this is a story of creating value among multiple companies through co-creation that a company operating independently would be unable to produce, and going on to build a new competitive advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A collection of Lewin’s posthumous manuscripts edited by Cartwright and published in 1951.

  2. 2.

    This chapter makes a clear distinction between “co-creation” and “collaboration,” but refers to this previous research from the viewpoint of proceeding with tasks through cooperation among different organizations.

  3. 3.

    Meanwhile, it is certain that the natural sciences have come to select only those targets that are capable of being analyzed. In other words, reductionism excludes those targets that resist analysis.

  4. 4.

    Even in some fields of the social science domain, such as economics, there is a tendency to take an approach based on natural science models and pursue the formulation of universal laws through mathematical models.

References

  • Andrews, K. R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, III: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytical Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. L., & Gilbert, C. G. (Eds.). (2007). From Resource Allocation to Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York, NY: Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1994). Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003a). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003b). Open innovation: How companies actually do it. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Business Models: How to thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, T., Hitt, M., & Levitas, E. (1997). Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examinations of US and Korean firms. Journal of World Business, 32(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverri, P., & Skälen, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (1997). Games Business Play: Cases and Models. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummerus, J. (2013). Value creation process and value outcomes in marketing theory: Strangers or siblings? Marketing Theory, 13(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H. (1999). Management of “Ba”: A New Management Paradigm. Tokyo: NTT Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1994). Collaborative advantage: Successful partnerships manage the relationships, not just the deal. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karababa, E., & Kjeldgaard, D. (2014). Value in marketing: Toward sociocultural perspectives. Marketing Theory, 14(1), 119–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers, Edited by Dorwin Cartwright. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. P. (2002). Competitive Solutions: The Strategist’s Toolkit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, C., Spena, T. R., & Colurcio, M. (2010). Co-creating Value Innovation through Resource Integration. International Journal of Quality and Service Science, 2(1), 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, K. (1965). A Full Collection of Kitaro Nishida’s Work. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). Co-creation experience: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing., 18(3), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). The Future of Competition, Co-creating Unique Value with Customers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1978). Strategic Change: Logical Incrementalism (pp. 7–21). Fall: Sloan Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1980). Strategic for Change: Logical Incrementalism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In L. R. Boyden (Ed.), Competitive Strategic Management (pp. 556–570). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarijärvi, H. (2012). The mechanisms of value co-creation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(5), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, H. (2000). “Ba” and Co-Creation. Tokyo: NTT Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, H. (2003). The Concept of “Ba”. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. A. (1969). Top Management Planning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueda, K. (Ed.). (2004). What is Co-Creation?. Tokyo: Baifukan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in international collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science., 39(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service system and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wistow, G., & Hardy, B. (1991). Joint management in community care. Journal of Management in Medicine, 5, 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuyuki Tokoro .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tokoro, N. (2016). A Theoretical Framework for Relationship-Based Strategies. In: The Smart City and the Co-creation of Value. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55846-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics