Skip to main content

Welfare and Efficiency: Socioeconomic Controversies in Modern Times

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Macroeconomics, Trade, and Social Welfare

Part of the book series: Advances in Japanese Business and Economics ((AJBE,volume 14))

Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed a number of critics and commentators who argue that the pursuit of efficiency spoils the realization of social values such as security, health, environment, and fairness. Is it really true that the pursuit of efficiency impedes social values? What are the social values to begin with? Are they to be distinguished from the individual values in the narrow sense defined in economics? In this chapter, we intend to review the relevant concepts and elucidate the relationship between social values and efficiency.

This chapter is based on the draft of my lecture given at Kumamoto Gakuen University in commemoration of the Department of International Economics on June 26, 2010. I appreciate Professor Moriki Hosoe for arrangement for the lecture and helpful discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given the budget (target) G 0 (= R 0), the socially optimal equilibrium must be located somewhere on the value frontier G O R O . The misallocation of resources arises from the swindle of the social indifference curve by that of the national enterprise.

  2. 2.

    The common view is that there are trade-offs between fairness (or equity) and efficiency. See Examples 2 and 3 above , or Mankiw (1998), Krugman and Wells (2006). We do not share this view.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1986). The soft budget constraint. Kyklos, 39(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. H., & Wells, R. (2006). Macroeconomics. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G. (1998). Principles of economics. Boston: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohyama, M. (1972). Trade and welfare in general equilibrium. Keio Economic Studies, 9, 37–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1938). Interpersonal comparison of utility: A comment. The Economic Journal, 48, 692–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1956). Social indifference curves. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (2005) Economics. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1952). On the theory of economic policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ohyama, M. (2016). Welfare and Efficiency: Socioeconomic Controversies in Modern Times. In: Macroeconomics, Trade, and Social Welfare. Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, vol 14. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55807-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics