Abstract
In recent years, the possibility for consumers to engage in consumer loans have been rising exponentially. This brings with itself an increased possibility of consumers with debt problems and possible personal bankruptcies. This paper examines two pieces of legislation, from two very different regions, the European Union and Japan, designed to deal with these, and other problems.
The Japanese Money Lending Business Law, designed to combat the problem of people shouldering multiple debts, personal bankruptcies, and increasingly aggressive debt collection, can be said to have been successful. The amount of bankruptcies and people with multiple debt has dropped, and the interest rate on consumer credit was made clear within the law. It is not an unmitigated success, however, since the new restrictions on creditworthiness render a large part of the population unable to engage in consumer loans in the first place.
The European Union’s Consumer Credit Directive has, next to the objective of added consumer protection, the objective to harmonize consumer credit across the internal market. While it raises the bar for consumer protection rigidly, the harmonization of the internal market for consumer credit remains lackluster.
While both pieces of legislation have slightly different aims, the Japanese law can be said to have come to closest to fulfilling them, when compared to the European Directive. A harmonized interest rate or a standard concerning the creditworthiness of the consumer, as can be found in the Money Lending Business Law, might be worth considering in the European Union as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Money Lending Business Act, Law number: Act No. 32 of 1983 available translated to English at http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?printID=&ft=1&re=02&dn=1&x=0&y=0&co=01&ky=%E8%B2%B8%E9%87%91%E6%A5%AD%E6%B3%95&page=4&vm=02. Accessed 22 July 2015.
- 2.
Q&A on the new MLBL on the Financial Agency Website, Question 3: Q: Why was a law like this created? A: In recent years, the amount of persons with multiple debts who were burdened by such an amount of loans that they couldn’t pay them back anymore kept on rising and created a serious social problem (Multiple Debt Problem). With the objective of solving this Multiple Debt Problem in mind, we felt it was necessary to drastically reform the current legislation, and as a result of this, the new MLBL was created. For details see Japan Financial Agency Website (2015b).
- 3.
This is clear from preamble (2) and (4). The results from the studies only make reference to the working of the internal market for consumer credits and how this is disturbed by a lack of harmonized legislation.
- 4.
The Law of June 13th 2010 to the modification of the law of June 12th 1991 on Consumer Credit and the Consumer Credit act 1974 respectively.
- 5.
Q&A on the new MLBL on the Financial Agency Website, Question 3. For details see Japan Financial Agency Website (2015b).
- 6.
Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2003, Subdivision 99: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases.
- 7.
Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2004, Subdivision 102: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases.
- 8.
Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2011, Subdivision 105: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases.
- 9.
Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2001, Subdivision 99: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2002, Subdivision 99: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2003, Subdivision 99: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2004, Subdivision 102: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2005, Subdivision 102: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2010, Subdivision 105: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2011, Subdivision 105: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases.
- 10.
As of 26 October 2011 the Japanese population was at 128,057,352, data taken from the Japan Census Bureau Website (2010).
- 11.
Nagashima and Tsunematsu (2007).
- 12.
Judgment on the legitimacy of Article 15(2) of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Money Lending Business Control and Regulation Act, 2004 (Ju) No. 1518, Minshu Vol. 60, No. 1 (Supreme Court 2006/01/13) official translation available at http://www.courts.go.jp/english/judgments/text/2006.01.13-2004.-Ju-.No..1518.html. Accessed 22 July 2015.
- 13.
Uranaka and Fuse (2010).
- 14.
Q&A on the new MLBL on the Financial Agency Website. For details see Japan Financial Agency Website (2015b).
- 15.
“This law was passed unanimously in the diet in December 2006” – see Japan Financial Agency Website (2015a).
- 16.
Article 13(3) Money Lending Business Law.
- 17.
Article 13 (3.1) and (3.2) Money Lending Business Law.
- 18.
Article 13.2 (1) Money Lending Business Law.
- 19.
Article 13.2(2) Money Lending Business Law.
- 20.
Ueyanagi and Ōmori (2008), p. 114.
- 21.
Ueyanagi and Ōmori (2008), p. 115.
- 22.
Ueyanagi and Ōmori (2008), p. 107.
- 23.
Article 1 Interest Rate Restriction Act.
- 24.
Shusshi no ukeire, ozukarikin oyobi kinritou no torishimari ni kansuru houritsu [Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates] available at http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/S29/S29HO195.html. Accessed 29 June 2015.
- 25.
Article 5(2) Interest Rate Restriction Act.
- 26.
Ueyanagi and Ōmori (2008), p. 185.
- 27.
Article 47-3(1)(3) Money Lending Business Act.
- 28.
Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2001, Subdivision 99: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2002, Subdivision 99: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2003, Subdivision 99: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2004, Subdivision 102: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2005, Subdivision 102: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2010, Subdivision 105: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases; Supreme Court of Japan, Judicial Statistics 2011, Subdivision 105: Number of newly received bankruptcy cases. The amount of yearly personal bankruptcies has gone down from 242.357 in 2003 to 100.510 in 2011, decreasing the amount of personal bankruptcies by more than 50 %.
- 29.
Hou Terrace is the colloquial name. The full name of this institution is the “Japan Legal Support Center”. It was established as the central organization to provide legal assistance to citizens, based on the goal to “realize a society where legal information and services are accessible anywhere in the country”. Japan Legal Support Center Website. What is the JLSC?. For details see http://www.houterasu.or.jp/en/about_jlsc/index.html. Accessed 22 July 2015.
- 30.
Interview with lawyers at the Lawyer Center suggests that before the introduction of the new MLBL and IRRA the amount of people visiting the Lawyer Center concerning debt problems made up about 90 % of the total amount of people visiting. (Date of interview: 24 February 2012).
- 31.
Honjo (2009).
- 32.
Honjo (2009).
- 33.
Financial Services Agency (2010).
- 34.
Financial Services Agency (2010).
- 35.
Masuhara (2012).
- 36.
Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (Consumer Credit Agreements Directive).
- 37.
Preamble (2) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 38.
Ashida (2004) p. 61.
- 39.
Preamble (3) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 40.
Preamble (4) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 41.
Preamble (7) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 42.
Preamble (5) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive: “In recent years the types of credit offered to and used by consumers have evolved considerably. New credit instruments have appeared, and their use continues to develop.”
- 43.
Preamble (9) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 44.
Preamble (9) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive: “Member States should therefore not be allowed to maintain or introduce national provisions other than those laid down in this Directive. However, such restriction should only apply where there are provisions harmonized in this Directive. Where no such harmonized provisions exist, Member States should remain free to maintain or introduce national legislation.”
- 45.
European Opinion Research Group (2001).
- 46.
European Opinion Research Group (2001), p. 60.
- 47.
European Opinion Research Group (2001), p. 100.
- 48.
European Opinion Research Group (2005).
- 49.
European Opinion Research Group (2005), p. 45.
- 50.
- 51.
For a full list please see: Article 2 Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 52.
A limited range of articles from the Consumer Credit Directive is applicable to these types of credits, see: Article 2(3) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 53.
Schon (2005) p. 53.
- 54.
Article 2(1) Money Lending Business Law.
- 55.
Article 8(1) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 56.
Article 8(2) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 57.
De Muynck and Steenoot (2011) p. 24.
- 58.
Law of June 13th 2010 to the modification of the law of June 12th 1991 on Consumer Credit (Consumer Credit Modification Law), Article 15 reads as follows: The creditor is only allowed to conclude a credit agreement when he, taking note of the information he possesses or should possess, inter alia based on consultation regulated by article 9 of the law of August 10th 2001 concerning the Center for credit to individuals, and on the basis on information in article 10 of this law, reasonably has to assume that the consumer will be capable of fulfilling the obligations resulting from the agreement.
- 59.
Note: this is not an official translation, the full text of the law (in Dutch or French) can be consulted at http://economie.demoroom.be/nl/wet-consumentenkrediet/. Accessed 22 July 2015.
Law of June 13th 2010 to the modification of the law of June 12th 1991 on Consumer Credit, Article 10.
- 60.
Consumer Credit Act 1974 c 39. Section 55B available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/55B. Accessed 22 July 2015.
- 61.
Meel (2008), p. 10.
- 62.
Christiaens (2008), p. 52.
- 63.
Meel (2008), p. 10.
- 64.
Christiaens (2008), p. 52.
- 65.
Preamble (19) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 66.
Micklitz et al. (2010), p. 383.
- 67.
Article 5(1) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 68.
For a complete list please see Article 5 (a)–(s) Consumer Credit Agreements Directive.
- 69.
Micklitz et al. (2010), p. 385.
- 70.
Micklitz et al. (2010), p. 385.
- 71.
Reifner et al. (2009), pp. 50–52.
- 72.
Reifner et al. (2009), p. 54.
- 73.
Reifner et al. (2009), p. 64.
- 74.
The Euro Interbank Offered Rates are daily reference rates based on the average interest rates at which a panel of roughly 50 European banks borrows funds from one another.
- 75.
Paragon Finance plc v Staunton and Nash, [2002] 2 All ER 248.
- 76.
Reifner et al. (2009), p. 328.
- 77.
Reifner et al. (2009), p. 326.
- 78.
Reifner et al. (2009), pp. 226–237.
- 79.
See Sect. 3.2.3.
- 80.
Article 85 Consumer Credit Modification Law.
- 81.
Article 87 Consumer Credit Modification Law.
- 82.
Reifner et al. (2009), p. 79.
- 83.
As per the Explanatory Memorandum to the draft bill to the modification of the law of June 12th 1991 on Consumer Credit – Parl. St., Kamer, 2001–2002, 1730/001, 46.
- 84.
Article 101(§1)(1)(a) Consumer Credit Modification Law.
- 85.
Article 103(1) Consumer Credit Modification Law.
- 86.
Article 106 Consumer Credit Modification Law.
- 87.
Reifner et al. (2009), p. 80.
- 88.
Special Eurobarometer (2008), pp. 73–75.
- 89.
GHK (2009), p. 91.
- 90.
See Sect. 2.3.
- 91.
GHK (2009), p. iv.
- 92.
GHK (2009), p. 93.
- 93.
GHK (2009), p. 40.
- 94.
GHK (2009), p. 41.
- 95.
GHK (2009), p. 41.
- 96.
Reifner et al. (2009).
- 97.
GHK (2009).
- 98.
Feretti (2007) p. 6.
References
Ashida M (2004) shōhishashinyō ni kansuru EU shimei kaiseisōan to kinyūjitsumumen kara mita kadai (Draft of amendments to EU Directives on consumer credit and issues to be addressed from the perspective of financial practice). shōhishashinyū sābisu kenkyūgakkai nenpō 4:59–71
Christiaens P (2008) De Markt van het Consumentenkrediet in Belgie (The Consumer Credit Market in Belgium). http://archive-be.com/page/1240/2012-05-08/http://www.upc-bvk.be/documents/public/Pieter%20CHRISTIAENS%20tekst.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2015
De Muynck M, Steenoot R (2011) De nieuwe wet consumentenkrediet en de kredietopening: een afdoende bescherming voor de consument? (The new law on consumer credit and opening of credits: a sufficient protection for the consumer?). Tijdschrift voor Belgisch Handelsrecht 3:191–214
European Opinion Research Group (2001) Public opinion in Europe: views on financial services. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_160_b_en.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2015
European Opinion Research Group (2004) Public opinion in Europe on financial services. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_int/fina_serv/cons_experiences/fullreport_en.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2015
European Opinion Research Group (2005) Public opinion in Europe on financial services. http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_int/fina_serv/cons_experiences/report_eurobarometer63-2_en.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2015
Federal Public Service Economy (2012) Maximum rates (APR – Annual percentage rate of charge). http://economie.fgov.be/nl/consument/consumentenkrediet/Kredietkosten/Maximale_tarieven/. Accessed 29 June 2015
Feretti F (2007) The regulation of consumer credit information systems: is the EU missing a chance? Leg Issues Econ Integr 34:115–131
Financial Services Agency (2010) kashikingō kankei shiryōshūgyōtaibetsu no kashitsuke zandaka (Money lending business-related materials, 2.2 Balance of loans according to business.) http://www.fsa.go.jp/status/kasikin/20101102/index.html. Accessed 22 July 2015
GHK (2009) Establishment of a benchmark on the economic impact of the consumer credit directive on the functioning of the internal market in this sector and on the level of consumer protection. DG Sanco, Brussels
Honjo YA (2009) The Japanese consumer finance industry: a study in re-regulation. http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/events/bbl/09061801.html. Accessed 22 July 2015
Japan Census Bureau Website (2010) 2010 National Census results for the entire country. http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?bid=000001034991&cycode=0. Accessed 22 July 2015
Japan Financial Agency Website (2015a) Money Lending Business Law central page. http://www.fsa.go.jp/policy/kashikin/index.html. Accessed 22 July 2015
Japan Financial Agency Website (2015b) Money Lending Business Law Q&A. http://www.fsa.go.jp/policy/kashikin/qa.html. Accessed 22 July 2015
Masuhara Y (2012) Failures and reflections on creating the reformed Money Lending Business Law. http://gendai.ismedia.jp/articles/print/33356
Meel F (2008) Marktevolutie inzake hypothecair krediet en consumentenkrediet (Market evolution concerning mortgages and consumer credit). http://www.docstoc.com/docs/143507351/1-ste-semester-2010---UPC-BVK. Accessed 22 July 2015
Micklitz H-W, Stuyck J, Evelyne T (eds) (2010) Cases, materials and text on Consumer Law. Hart Publishing, Portland
Nagashima, Tsunematsu (2007) Money lending. Int Financ Law Rev. http://www.iflr.com/Article/1977313/Money-lending.html. Accessed 22 July 2015
OPTEM (2003) Qualitative study: cross-border buyers of financial services http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_int/fina_serv/cons_experiences/cross_border_final_report_en.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2015
Reifner U, Clerc-Renaud S, Knobloch M (2009) Study on interest rate restrictions in the EU, Final Report. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finservices-retail/docs/credit/irr_report_en.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2015
Schon B-B (2005) Yōroppa shōhishashinyōhō: EU iinkai no shinshōhishashinyōshirei no teian wo chūshin ni shite (European consumer law in consideration of the commission’s proposal for a new directive on consumer credit). Dōshisha Univ Worldw Bus Rev 6:47–57
Special Eurobarometer (2008) Consumer protection in the internal market. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_298_en.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2015
Ueyanagi T, Omori Y (2008) Chikujo Kaisetsu Kashikingyoho (A point by point explanation of the Money Lending Business Act). Shojihomu, Tokyo
Uranaka T, Fuse T (2010) Consumer lender Takefuji fails owing $5.1 billion. REUTERS http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/28/us-takefuji-idUSTRE68R00T20100928. Accessed 22 July 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jacob, J. (2016). Consumer Credit Law in the European Union and Japan: A Comparative Study. In: Fenwick, M., Wrbka, S. (eds) Flexibility in Modern Business Law. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55787-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55787-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55786-9
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55787-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)