Advertisement

Conclusions and Policy Implications

  • Michiko Iizuka
  • Akio Hosono
  • Jorge Katz
Chapter

Abstract

This book examines the development of the Chilean salmon farming industry, paying special attention to public goods, namely: ‘knowledge development’, ‘environmental sustainability’, ‘institutions’ and ‘inclusiveness/social welfare’. Normally, policy interventions in managing public goods are justified by the market failure argument. There are; however, several scholars who question assumptions made by neoclassical approach and extend their argument for the policy intervention in correcting systemic failure as well as coordination failure (for example, Cimoli et al. 2009; Stiglitz 1999).

Keywords

Common Pool Resource Green Economy Asian Development Bank Salmon Farming Inclusive Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., and J. Robinson. 2012. Why nations fail. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. Robinson. 2005. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Handbook of economic growth, vol. 1A, ed. P. Aghion and S. Durlauf. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Ali, Ifzal. 2007. Propoor to inclusive growth: Asian prescriptions, ERD Asian Development Review Policy Brief, vol. 48. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  4. Ali, Ifzal, and J. Zhuang. 2007. Inclusive growth toward a prosperous Asia: Policy implications, ERD Working paper, vol. 97. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  5. Aoki, M. 2007. Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes. Journal of Institutional Economics 3(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2011. Framework of inclusive growth indicators; key indicators for Asia and pacific 2011, special supplement. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, M., and K. Pavitt. 1995. The development of technological capabilities. In Trade, technology and international competitiveness, ed. I.U. Haque, 69–102. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Cimoli, M., G. Dosi, and J. Stiglitz. 2009. Industrial policy and development: Political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. David, P. 1993. Intellectual property institutions and the panda’s thumb: Patents, copy rights and trade secrets in economic theory and history. In Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology, ed. M.B. Wallerstein, M.E. Mogee, and R.A. Schoen, 19–64. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fu, X., C. Pietrobelli, and L. Soete. 2011. The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: Technological change and catch up. World Development 39(7): 1204–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greif, A. 2006. Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(1968): 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  15. Hawken, P., A. Lovins, and H. Lovins. 1999. Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Boston: Little Brown Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Kapital Social. 2011. Encuesta de Percepción Industria del Salmón: Regiones de Los Lagos, Aysény Magallanes, presentation slides. Puert Montt.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, J. 1984. Domestic technological innovations and dynamic comparative advantage: Further reflections on a comparative case study program. Journal of Development Economics 16(1–2): 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, L. 1998. Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science 9(4): 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lall, S. 1992. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development 20(2): 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lenzen, M., D. Moran, K. Kanemoto, B. Foran, L. Lobefaro, and A. Geschke. 2012. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486: 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nissanke, M., and E. Thorbecke. 2010. Globalization, poverty and inequality in Latin America: Finding from case studies. World Development 38(6): 797–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD. 2011. OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: Evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ostrom, E., J. Burger, C.B. Field, R.B. Norgaard, and D. Policansky. 1999. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science 284(1999): 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pardey, P.G., J.M. Alston, and V.W. Ruttan. 2010. The economics of innovation and technical change in agriculture. In Handbook of economics of technical change, ed. B.H. Hall and N. Rosenberg. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Perez, C. 2011. Director of Social Kapital. Interview by author. December 1, 2011Google Scholar
  27. Pietrobelli, C., and R. Rabellotti. 2011. Global value chains meet innovation systems: Are there learning opportunities for developing countries? World Development 39(7): 1261–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rauniyar, G., and R. Kanbur. 2009. Inclusive growth and inclusive development, ADB, Occasional paper, vol. 8. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Stiglitz, J.E. 1999. Knowledge as a global public good. In Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century, ed. I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, and M. Stern, 308–325. New York: Office of Development Studies (ODS), Bureau for Development Policy (BDP), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UNDP. 2008. GIM global reports. UNDP.Google Scholar
  32. UNEP. 2013. Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – A synthesis for policy makers. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy. Accessed 23 May 2012.

Copyright information

© JICA Research Institute 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Center for Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT)United Nations UniversityMaastrcihtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Japan International Cooperation Agency Research Institute (JICA-RI)TokyoJapan
  3. 3.University of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations