An Overview of Intertemporal Measures of Individual Well-Being: Can They Explain Life Satisfaction Better?

  • Conchita D’Ambrosio
Part of the Creative Economy book series (CRE)


Individual well-being is multidimensional, and depends on comparisons to a reference and on past experiences. Various aspects of quality of life need to be jointly considered in its measurement. Traditional economic modeling has neglected these basic facts. However, this neglect has been challenged by an increasing number of contributions in the income-distribution literature on the measurement of individual well-being. These have proposed various indices which allow different aspects of comparisons to others and to past experiences to be brought into the analysis of the phenomenon under consideration.


Relative Income Loss Aversion Relative Deprivation Material Deprivation Multidimensional Poverty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I thank Walter Bossert, Andrew Clark, Werner Pascha, Tadashi Yagi and participants at the International Conference on Comparative Study on Happiness in Kyoto and Paris for comments and suggestions.


  1. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measuremen. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. B. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation: Contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bossert, W., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2013). Measuring economic insecurity. International Economic Review, 54, 1017–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossert, W., Chakravarty, S. R., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2012). Poverty and time. Journal of Economic Inequality, 10, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossert, W., Chakravarty, S. R., Ceriani, l., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2014). Intertemporal material deprivation. In G. Betti & A. Lemmi (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion (pp. 128–142). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Chakravarty, S. R. (1997). Relative deprivation and satisfaction orderings. Keio Economic Studies, 34, 17–31.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A. E., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2015). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handobook of income distribution (Vol. 2 A, pp. 1147–1208). North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A. E., Kristensen, N., & Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2009). Job satisfaction and co-worker wages: Status or signal? Economic Journal, 119, 430–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Ambrosio, C. (2013). The indicators of intertemporal material deprivation: A proposal and an application to EU countries (ImPRovE Discussion Papar No. 13/08).Google Scholar
  11. D’Ambrosio, C., & Frick, J. R. (2012). Individual well-being in a dynamic perspective. Economica, 79, 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dutta, I., Roope, L., & Zank, H. (2013). On intertemporal poverty: Affluence-dependent measures. Social Choice and Welfare, 41, 741–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and co-operation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, J. E. (2009). A class of chronic poverty measures. In T. Addison, D. Hulme, & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Poverty dynamics (pp. 59–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, J. E., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty indices. Econometrica, 52, 761–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hacker, J. S., Huber, G. A., Rehm, P., Schlesinger, M., & Valletta, R. (2010). Economic security at risk. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Hey, J. D., & Lambert, P. (1980). Relative deprivation and the gini coefficient: Comment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirschman, A. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 544–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hojman, D., & Kast, F. (2009). On the measurement of poverty dynamics (Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09-35). Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar
  20. International Labour Organization (2004). Economic security for a better world. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  21. Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2009). New estimates of the index of economic well-being for selected OECD countries, 1980–2007 (CSLS Research Report 2009-11).Google Scholar
  22. Sen, A. (1976). Famines as failures of exchange entitlements. Economic and Political Weekly, 11, 1273–1280.Google Scholar
  23. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Senik, C. (2004). When information dominates comparison. Learning from Russian subjective panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2099–2123.Google Scholar
  25. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. CMEPSP.Google Scholar
  26. Yitzhaki, S. (1979). Relative deprivation and the gini coefficient. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université du LuxembourgEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations