Advertisement

Can Work-Life Balance Policies Foster Happiness Within the Family? A Comparison of Traditional Versus New Family Arrangements

  • Álvaro Martínez-Pérez
Part of the Creative Economy book series (CRE)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the extent to which self-reported well-being, as measured by life satisfaction, for parents living in traditional (coupled mothers and fathers with dependant children) and new family arrangements (lone mothers and fathers) is affected by the use of work-life balance arrangements (WLB, henceforth) (formal and informal) as a coping strategy with the time pressures derived from their labour market responsibilities.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Family Type Dependant Child Lone Parent Lone Mother 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aybars, A. I. (2007). Work-life balance in the EU and leave arrangements across welfare regimes. Industrial Relations Journal, 38, 569–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benin, M. H., & Nienstedt, B. C. (1985). Happiness in single- and dual-earner families: The effects of marital happiness, job satisfaction, and life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 975–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonney, N. (2005). Overworked Britons? Part-time work and work-life balance. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonney, N. (2007). Gender, employment and social class. Work, Employment and Society, 21, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth, A. L., & Van Ours, J. C. (2007). Job satisfaction and family happiness: The part-time work puzzle (ISER Working Paper). Colchester.Google Scholar
  7. Cebolla, H. (2013). Introducción al análisis multinivel (Vol. 49). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
  8. Cousins, C. R., & Tang, N. (2004). Working time and work and family conflict in the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 18, 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross-national analysis in two waves. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dex, S., & Bond, S. (2005). Measuring work-life balance and its covariates. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyer, W. G. (1956). A comparison of families of high and low job satisfaction. Marriage and Family Living, 18, 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender : a social, economic, and demographic view. New York: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  13. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrera, M. (1996). The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. B. (1978). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. The American Economic Review, 68, 135–141.Google Scholar
  18. Gambles, R., Lewis, S., & Rapoport, R. (2006). The myth of work-life balance: The challenge of our time for men, women and societies. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glenn, N. D., & Weaver, C. N. (1982). Further evidence on education and job satisfaction. Social Forces, 61, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gruenberg, B. (1980). The happy worker: An analysis of educational and occupational differences in determinants of job satisfaction. The American Journal of Sociology, 86, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hakim, C. (1996). Key issues in women’s work: Female heterogeneity and the polarisation of women’s employment. London: Atlantic Highlands.Google Scholar
  22. Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hanson, S. L., & Sloane, D. M. (1992). Young children and job satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Healy, G. (2004). Work-life balance and family friendly policies. In whose interest? Work, Employment and Society, 18, 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  26. Hoque, K., & Noon, M. (2004). Equal opportunities policy and practice in Britain: Evaluating the empty shell hypothesis. Work, Employment and Society, 18, 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houston, D. (Ed.). (2005). Work-life balance in the 21st century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Hyman, J., Scholarios, D., & Baldry, C. (2005). Getting on or getting by? Employee flexibility and coping strategies for home and work. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janson, P., & Martin, J. K. (1982). Job satisfaction and age: A test of two views. Social Forces, 60, 1089–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaiser, L. (2005). Gender-job satisfaction differences across Europe: An indicator for labour market modernization (IZA-Discussion Paper Series). Bonn.Google Scholar
  31. Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42, 124–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalleberg, A. L., & Loscocco, K. A. (1983). Aging, values, and rewards: Explaining age differences in job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 48, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, J., & Campbell, M. (2007). Work/family balance policies in the UK since 1997: A new departure? Journal of Social Policy, 36, 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 988–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marks, S. R. (1994). Intimacy in the public realm: The case of co-workers. Social Forces, 72, 843–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moss, P., & Korintus, M. (2008). International review of leave policies and related research (Employment relations research series, No 100, July 2008, URN 08/157).Google Scholar
  37. OECD. (2005). Babies and bosses: Reconciling work and family life. Canada: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Rose, M. (2003). Good deal, bad deal? Job satisfaction in occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 17, 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shelton, B. A., & Daphne, J. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smeaton, D. (2006). Work return rates after childbirth in the UK: Trends determinants and implications: a comparison of cohorts born in 1958 and 1970. Work, Employment and Society, 20, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stapel, J. (1950). What is job satisfaction? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 14, 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  43. Van der Lippe, T. (2004). Dutch workers and time pressure: Household and workplace characteristics. Work, Employment and Society, 21, 693–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varca, P. E., Shaffer, G. S., & McCauley, C. D. (1983). Sex differences in job satisfaction revisited. The Academy of Management Journal, 26, 348–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weaver, C. N. (1978). Sex differences in the determinants of job satisfaction. The Academy of Management Journal, 21, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wharton, A. S., Rotolo, T., & Bird, S. R. (2000). Social context at work: A multilevel analysis of job satisfaction. Sociological Forum, 15, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociological Studies ElmfieldThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations