Advertisement

Why Do Japanese Parents and Their Young Adult Children Live Together?

  • Kei Sakata
  • Colin R. McKenzie
Part of the Creative Economy book series (CRE)

Abstract

This chapter examines how co-residence with adult children affects the levels of parental satisfaction in Japan. Our empirical evidence suggests that parents are more likely to be dissatisfied with their life and marriage when they live with an adult child. The gender analysis reveals that mothers (fathers) are more likely to be dissatisfied with the co-residence with an adult son (daughter), but fathers (mothers) are likely to be indifferent. Importantly, parents who co-reside with an unmarried adult child are more likely to be financially distressed.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Propensity Score Adult Child Propensity Score Match Marital Satisfaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Both authors wish to thank Toshiaki Tachibanaki and Aki Tsuchiya for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this chapter, and participants of the International Conference—Comparative Study on Happiness for their helpful comments and suggestions. They also acknowledge the kind permission of the National Family Committee of the Japanese Society of Family Sociology and the Social Science and the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Information Center for Social Science Research on Japan, Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo in making available the data in the “National Family Research of Japan (NFRJ)” (Kazoku ni tsuite no Zenkoku Chousa) for use in the analysis in this chapter. The first author would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant in Aid for Scientific Research (B) No. 24330093 for a project on “Retirement Behavior of the Aged and their Cognitive Ability and Health” and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant in Aid for Scientific Research (B) No. 23330094 for a project “Life Events and Economic Behaviour: A Perspective of Family Inter-dependence” (Project Leader: Midori Wakabayashi). The second author wishes to acknowledge the financial support of a Japan Society for the Promotion of Society’s Topic-Setting Program to Advance Cutting-Edge Humanities and Social Sciences Research grant for a project entitled “Multi-Dimensional Dynamic Analysis of Gender Equality and the Role of the Family in Internationally Comparable Data” (Project Leader: Yoshio Higuchi).

References

  1. Aquilino, W. S., & Supple, K. R. (1991). Parent-child relations and parents’ satisfaction with living arrangements when adult children live at home. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, S. O., Bentolila, S., Fernandes, A., & Ichino, A. (2008). Income insecurity and youth emancipation: A theoretical approach. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 8(1), 1935–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanco, A., & Kluve, J. (2002). Why not stay home? Nest-leaving behavior in Western Europe. http://www.iza.org/iza/en/papers/transatlantic/1_kluve.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2012.
  5. Cabinet Office (Japan). (2003). Heisei 15 nenban kokumin seikatsu hakusho: Defure to seikatsu – jakunen furita no genzai (ima) (Annual report on the national lifestyle for FY 2003: Deflation and lifestyle- young job hoppers now). http://www5.cao.go.jp/seikatsu/whitepaper/h15/honbun/. Accessed 25 Feb 2012.
  6. Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Card, D., & Lemieux, T. (2000). Adapting to circumstances: The evolution of work, school, and living arrangements among North American youth. In D. G. Blanchflower & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Youth employment and joblessness in advanced countries (pp. 171–213). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, V. W., & Zeiser, K. (2008). Implementing propensity score matching causal analysis with Stata. http://help.pop.psu.edu/help-by-statistical-method/propensity-matching/Intro%20to%20P-score_Sp08.pdf/?searchterm=Implementingpropensity score matching. Accessed 12 Apr 2012.
  9. Cobb-Clark, D. A. (2008). Leaving home: What economics has to say about the living arrangements of young Australians. Australian Economic Review, 41(2), 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Gorgens, T. (2014). Parents’ economic support of young-adult children: Do socioeconomic circumstances matter? Journal of Population Economics, 27(4), 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, D. (1990). Intergenerational transfers and liquidity constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dai-Ichi Life Research Institute. (2005). Kodomo no shourai ni muketa oya no ishiki chousa (Survey of parental perceptions about their children’s future). http://group.dai-ichi-life.co.jp/dlri/ldi/news/news0506.pdf#search=%E5%AD%90%E4%BE%9B%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%86%E6%9D%A5%E3%81%AB%E5%90%91%E3%81%91%E3%81%9F. Accessed 18 May 2015.
  13. Ermisch, J. (1999). Prices, parents, and young people’s household formation. Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ermisch, J. (2003). An economic analysis of the family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. e-Stat. (2013). Vital statistics of Japan 2013, Volume 1 Natality. http://www. e-stat. go. Jp/SG1/estate/ListE.de? lid=000001127058. Accessed 26 Aug 2015.
  16. Fogli, A. (2004). Endogenous labor market rigidities and family ties. Unpublished working paper, New York University and the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  17. Giuliano, P. (2007). On the determinants of living arrangements in Western Europe: Does cultural origin matter? Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(5), 927–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guiso, L., & Jappelli, T. (2002). Private transfers, borrowing constraints, and the timing of homeownership. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 34, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haurin, D. R., Hendershott, P. H., & Kim, D. (1993). The impact of real rents and wages on household formation. Review of Economics and Statistic, 75, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Japan Society of Family Sociology, Research Group on National Family Research of Japan. (2000). Kazoku seikatsu nitsuiteno zenkoku chousa (NFR98) houkokusho no. 1 (First report on the National Family Research of Japan (NFR98)). http://nfrj.org/nfrj98_publishing.htm. Accessed 18 May 2015.
  23. Japan Society of Family Sociology, Research Committee on National Family Research of Japan. (2005). Kazoku seikatsu nitsuiteno zenkoku chousa (NFRJ03) Daiichiji Houkokusho (First report on the National Family Research of Japan (NFRJ03)). http://nfrj.org/nfrj03_publishing.htm. Accessed 18 May 2015.
  24. Manacorda, M., & Moretti, E. (2006). Why do most Italian young men live with their parents? Intergenerational transfers and household structure. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(4), 800–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinez-Granado, M., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2002). The decisions of Spanish youth: A cross-section study. Journal of Population Economics, 15(2), 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McElroy, M. B. (1985). The joint determination of household membership and market work: The case of young men. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(3), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. National Institute of Population and Social Security. (2003). Dai 3 kai zenkoku katei doko chousa (Third national family trend survey). Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security.Google Scholar
  28. Nishi, F. (2013). Oya to dokyo no mikonsha no saikin no joukyo (Recent trends of unmarried people living with their parents). http://www.stat.go.jp/training/2kenkyu/pdf/zuhyou/parasi_c.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2015.
  29. Raymo, J. M., & Ono, H. (2007). Coresidence with parents, women’s economic resources, and the transition to marriage in Japan. Journal of Family Issues, 28(5), 653–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raymo, J. M., Iwazawa, M., & Bumpass, L. (2009). Cohabitation and family formation in Japan. Demography, 46(4), 785–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the prosperity score u observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1993). Intergenerational support and the life-cycle of young men and their parents – Human capital investment, coresidence and intergenerational financial transfers. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1), 84–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (Japan). (2007). 2006 Survey on time use and leisure activities. http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/ListE.do?bid=000001008020&cycode=0. Accessed 10 Apr 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EconomicsRitsumeikan UniversityMinami-KusatsuJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations