Skip to main content
  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the clinical outcome and prognosis for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. However, some patients develop acquired resistance to TKI treatment. Several mechanisms for imatinib resistance in CML have been proposed, and “biomarkers” are used at diagnosis and during TKI treatment to predict CML patient outcome. In this chapter, we discuss prognostic scoring systems used at diagnosis such as the Sokal score, Hasford score, European Treatment and Outcome Study score, early molecular response to TKI as a surrogate endpoint, pharmacokinetic factors such as plasma concentration of TKIs, polymorphisms of drug transporters, immunological biomarkers such as T-cell profiling, and a common intronic deletion polymorphism in the gene-encoding BCL2-like 11 (BIM) as candidates for biomarkers associated with clinical endpoints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F, et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(11):994–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(23):2408–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, Hsu N, Paquette R, Rao PN, et al. Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science. 2001;293(5531):876–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Radich JP, Dai H, Mao M, Oehler V, Schelter J, Druker B, et al. Gene expression changes associated with progression and response in chronic myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(8):2794–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crossman LC, O’Brien SG. Imatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2004;18(3):605–17. 3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas J, Wang L, Clark RE, Pirmohamed M. Active transport of imatinib into and out of cells: implications for drug resistance. Blood. 2004;104(12):3739–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. White DL, Dang P, Engler J, Frede A, Zrim S, Osborn M, et al. Functional activity of the OCT-1 protein is predictive of long-term outcome in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2761–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng B, Hayes M, Resta D, Racine-Poon A, Druker BJ, Talpaz M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of imatinib in a phase I trial with chronic myeloid leukemia patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(5):935–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cortes JE, Egorin MJ, Guilhot F, Molimard M, Mahon FX. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation and blood-level testing in imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23(9):1537–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marin D, Bazeos A, Mahon FX, Eliasson L, Milojkovic D, Bua M, et al. Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2381–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng KP, Hillmer AM, Chuah CT, Juan WC, Ko TK, Teo AS, et al. A common BIM deletion polymorphism mediates intrinsic resistance and inferior responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer. Nat Med. 2012;18(4):521–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. BDW Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69(3):89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Strimbu K, Tavel JA. What are biomarkers? Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010;5(6):463–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sokal JE, Cox EB, Baccarani M, Tura S, Gomez GA, Robertson JE, et al. Prognostic discrimination in “good-risk” chronic granulocytic leukemia. Blood. 1984;63(4):789–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasford J, Pfirrmann M, Hehlmann R, Allan NC, Baccarani M, Kluin-Nelemans JC, et al. A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa. Writing Committee for the Collaborative CML Prognostic Factors Project Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(11):850–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasford J, Baccarani M, Hoffmann V, Guilhot J, Saussele S, Rosti G, et al. Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood. 2011;118(3):686–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tao Z, Liu B, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhang R, Han M, et al. EUTOS score predicts survival and cytogenetic response in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with first-line imatinib. Leuk Res. 2014;38(9):1030–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uz B, Buyukasik Y, Atay H, Kelkitli E, Turgut M, Bektas O, et al. EUTOS CML prognostic scoring system predicts ELN-based ‘event-free survival’ better than Euro/Hasford and Sokal systems in CML patients receiving front-line imatinib mesylate. Hematology. 2013;18(5):247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tiribelli M, Bonifacio M, Calistri E, Binotto G, Maino E, Marin L, et al. EUTOS score predicts long-term outcome but not optimal response to imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leuk Res. 2013;37(11):1457–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffmann VS, Baccarani M, Lindoerfer D, Castagnetti F, Turkina A, Zaritsky A, et al. The EUTOS prognostic score: review and validation in 1288 patients with CML treated frontline with imatinib. Leukemia. 2013;27(10):2016–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Breccia M, Finsinger P, Loglisci G, Latagliata R, Mancini M, Salaroli A, et al. The EUTOS score identifies chronic myeloid leukaemia patients with poor prognosis treated with imatinib first or second line. Leuk Res. 2012;36(9):e209–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonifacio M, Binotto G, Calistri E, Maino E, Tiribelli M. EUTOS score predicts early optimal response to imatinib according to the revised 2013 ELN recommendations. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(1):163–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iriyama N, Hatta Y, Kobayashi S, Uchino Y, Miura K, Kurita D, et al. The European Treatment and Outcome Study score is associated with clinical outcomes and treatment response following European LeukemiaNet 2013 recommendations in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2014;100(4):379–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marin D, Ibrahim AR, Goldman JM. European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) score for chronic myeloid leukemia still requires more confirmation. J Clin Oncol [Letter]. 2011;29:3944–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto E, Fujisawa S, Hagihara M, Tanaka M, Fujimaki K, Kishimoto K, et al. European Treatment and Outcome Study score does not predict imatinib treatment response and outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(1):105–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jabbour E, Cortes J, Nazha A, O’Brien S, Quintas-Cardama A, Pierce S, et al. EUTOS score is not predictive for survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single institution experience. Blood. 2012;119(19):4524–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, et al. European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood. 2013;122(6):872–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, De Souza C, Flinn IW, Stenke L, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(9):841–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Clark RE, Etienne G, Kim DW, et al. Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up. Leukemia. 2012;26(10):2197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Agarwal MB, Undurraga MS, et al. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2012;119(5):1123–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Agarwal MB, Undurraga MS, et al. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2012;119(5):1123–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Branford S, Muller MC, Kaeda JS, Foroni L, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Blood. 2010;116(19):3758–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanfstein B, Muller MC, Hehlmann R, Erben P, Lauseker M, Fabarius A, et al. Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Leukemia. 2012;26(9):2096–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Neelakantan P, Gerrard G, Lucas C, Milojkovic D, May P, Wang L, et al. Combining BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 and 6 months in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications for early intervention strategies. Blood. 2013;121(14):2739–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Saglio G, Steegmann JL, Shah NP, Boque C, et al. Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2014;123(4):494–500.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hughes TP, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, Guilhot F, Niederwieser D, Rosti G, et al. Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. Blood. 2014;123(9):1353–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahon FX, Rea D, Guilhot J, Guilhot F, Huguet F, Nicolini F, et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(11):1029–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ross DM, Branford S, Seymour JF, Schwarer AP, Arthur C, Yeung DT, et al. Safety and efficacy of imatinib cessation for CML patients with stable undetectable minimal residual disease: results from the TWISTER study. Blood. 2013;122(4):515–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rousselot P, Charbonnier A, Cony-Makhoul P, Agape P, Nicolini FE, Varet B, et al. Loss of major molecular response as a trigger for restarting tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia who have stopped imatinib after durable undetectable disease. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5):424–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Takahashi N, Wakita H, Miura M, Scott SA, Nishii K, Masuko M, et al. Correlation between imatinib pharmacokinetics and clinical response in Japanese patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;88(6):809–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Picard S, Titier K, Etienne G, Teilhet E, Ducint D, Bernard MA, et al. Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2007;109(8):3496–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ishikawa Y, Kiyoi H, Watanabe K, Miyamura K, Nakano Y, Kitamura K, et al. Trough plasma concentration of imatinib reflects BCR-ABL kinase inhibitory activity and clinical response in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a report from the BINGO study. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(10):2186–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Giles FJ, Yin OQ, Sallas WM, le Coutre PD, Woodman RC, Ottmann OG, et al. Nilotinib population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(4):813–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Burger H, Nooter K. Pharmacokinetic resistance to imatinib mesylate: role of the ABC drug pumps ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCB1 (MDR1) in the oral bioavailability of imatinib. Cell Cycle. 2004;3(12):1502–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Burger H, van Tol H, Boersma AW, Brok M, Wiemer EA, Stoter G, et al. Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a substrate for the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)/ABCG2 drug pump. Blood. 2004;104(9):2940–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Burger H, van Tol H, Brok M, Wiemer EA, de Bruijn EA, Guetens G, et al. Chronic imatinib mesylate exposure leads to reduced intracellular drug accumulation by induction of the ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCB1 (MDR1) drug transport pumps. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4(7):747–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ozvegy-Laczka C, Hegedus T, Varady G, Ujhelly O, Schuetz JD, Varadi A, et al. High-affinity interaction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with the ABCG2 multidrug transporter. Mol Pharmacol. 2004;65(6):1485–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Brendel C, Scharenberg C, Dohse M, Robey RW, Bates SE, Shukla S, et al. Imatinib mesylate and nilotinib (AMN107) exhibit high-affinity interaction with ABCG2 on primitive hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 2007;21(6):1267–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dohse M, Scharenberg C, Shukla S, Robey RW, Volkmann T, Deeken JF, et al. Comparison of ATP-binding cassette transporter interactions with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(8):1371–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. White DL, Saunders VA, Dang P, Engler J, Zannettino AC, Cambareri AC, et al. OCT-1-mediated influx is a key determinant of the intracellular uptake of imatinib but not nilotinib (AMN107): reduced OCT-1 activity is the cause of low in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. Blood. 2006;108(2):697–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang L, Giannoudis A, Lane S, Williamson P, Pirmohamed M, Clark RE. Expression of the uptake drug transporter hOCT1 is an important clinical determinant of the response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(2):258–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Choi MK, Song IS. Organic cation transporters and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2008;23(4):243–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zheng Q, Wu H, Yu Q, Kim DH, Lipton JH, Angelini S, et al. ABCB1 polymorphisms predict imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: a meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015;15(2):127–34.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Takahashi N, Miura M, Scott SA, Kagaya H, Kameoka Y, Tagawa H, et al. Influence of CYP3A5 and drug transporter polymorphisms on imatinib trough concentration and clinical response among patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. J Hum Genet. 2010;55(11):731–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Petain A, Kattygnarath D, Azard J, Chatelut E, Delbaldo C, Geoerger B, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of imatinib in children and adults. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(21):7102–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim DH, Sriharsha L, Xu W, Kamel-Reid S, Liu X, Siminovitch K, et al. Clinical relevance of a pharmacogenetic approach using multiple candidate genes to predict response and resistance to imatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(14):4750–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Shinohara Y, Takahashi N, Nishiwaki K, Hino M, Kashimura M, Wakita H, et al. A multicenter clinical study evaluating the confirmed complete molecular response rate in imatinib-treated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia by using the international scale of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Haematologica. 2013;98(9):1407–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Imai Y, Nakane M, Kage K, Tsukahara S, Ishikawa E, Tsuruo T, et al. C421A polymorphism in the human breast cancer resistance protein gene is associated with low expression of Q141K protein and low-level drug resistance. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002;1(8):611–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim DH, Kamel-Reid S, Chang H, Sutherland R, Jung CW, Kim HJ, et al. Natural killer or natural killer/T cell lineage large granular lymphocytosis associated with dasatinib therapy for Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemia. Haematologica. 2009;94(1):135–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mustjoki S, Ekblom M, Arstila TP, Dybedal I, Epling-Burnette PK, Guilhot F, et al. Clonal expansion of T/NK-cells during tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib therapy. Leukemia. 2009;23(8):1398–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kreutzman A, Juvonen V, Kairisto V, Ekblom M, Stenke L, Seggewiss R, et al. Mono/oligoclonal T and NK cells are common in chronic myeloid leukemia patients at diagnosis and expand during dasatinib therapy. Blood. 2010;116(5):772–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mizoguchi I, Yoshimoto T, Katagiri S, Mizuguchi J, Tauchi T, Kimura Y, et al. Sustained upregulation of effector natural killer cells in chronic myeloid leukemia after discontinuation of imatinib. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(9):1146–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rea D, Dulphy N, Henry G, Guilhot J, Guilhot F, Nicolini FE, et al. Low Natural Killer (NK) cell counts and functionality are associated with molecular relapse after imatinib discontinuation in patients (pts) with chronic phase (CP)-chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts for at least 2 years: preliminary results From immunostim, on behalf of STIM investigators. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts). 2013;122:865.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ilander MM, Olsson-Strömberg U, Hanna Lähteenmäki H, Kasanen T, Koskenvesa P, Söderlund S, et al. Disease relapse after TKI discontinuation in CML is related both to low number and impaired function of NK-cells: data from Euro-SKI. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts). 2013;122:379.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Burchert A, Muller MC, Kostrewa P, Erben P, Bostel T, Liebler S, et al. Sustained molecular response with interferon alfa maintenance after induction therapy with imatinib plus interferon alfa in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(8):1429–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Balachandran VP, Cavnar MJ, Zeng S, Bamboat ZM, Ocuin LM, Obaid H, et al. Imatinib potentiates antitumor T cell responses in gastrointestinal stromal tumor through the inhibition of Ido. Nat Med. 2011;17(9):1094–100.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kuroda J, Puthalakath H, Cragg MS, Kelly PN, Bouillet P, Huang DC, et al. Bim and Bad mediate imatinib-induced killing of Bcr/Abl + leukemic cells, and resistance due to their loss is overcome by a BH3 mimetic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(40):14907–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Augis V, Airiau K, Josselin M, Turcq B, Mahon FX, Belloc F. A single nucleotide polymorphism in cBIM is associated with a slower achievement of major molecular response in chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with imatinib. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78582.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoto Takahashi MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Takahashi, N. (2016). Biomarkers for Determining the Prognosis of CML. In: Kizaki, M. (eds) Molecular Pathogenesis and Treatment of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55714-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55714-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55713-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55714-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics