Advertisement

Data and Monte Carlo Simulation

  • Shingo KazamaEmail author
Chapter
  • 204 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of data and Monte Carlo simulation used in the analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1630 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Improved luminosity determination in \(pp = 7\) TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC (2013). arXiv:1302.4393 [hep-ex]
  3. 3.
    J. Pumplin et al., JHEP 07, 012 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Martin, W. Stirling, R. Thorne, G. Watt, Eur. Phys. J. C63, 189 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Guzzi et al. CT10 parton distributions and other developments in the global QCD analysis (2011). arXiv:1101.0561 [hep-ph]
  6. 6.
    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ATLAS Collaboration. Further ATLAS tunes of PYTHIA 6 and Pythia 8 (2011). ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-014Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4: A simulation toolkit (GEANT4 Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506, 250–303 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C70, 823 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.E. Paige, S.D. Protopopescu, H. Baer, X. Tata. ISAJET 7.69: a Monte Carlo event generator for pp, anti-pp, and e\(^{+}\) reactions (2003). arXiv:0312045 [hep-ph]
  11. 11.
    M. Bahr et al., Eur. Phys. J. C58, 639 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, P. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B492, 51 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.M. Nadolski et al., Phys. Rev. D78, 013004 (2008)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Botje et al., The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations (2011). arXiv:1101.0538 [hep-ph]
  15. 15.
    M.L. Mangano et al., JHEP 0307, 001 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Corcella et al., JHEP 01, 010 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.M. Butterworth, J.R. Forshaw, M.H. Seymour, Z. Phys C 72, 637 (1996)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Alwall et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 53, 473 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Nason, JHEP 11, 040 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Frixione, B.R. Webber. The MC@NLO 3.3 event generator (2006). arXiv:0612272 [hep-ph]
  21. 21.
    B.P. Kersevan, E. Richter-Was, JHEP 06, 043 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, JHEP 0605, 026 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Catani, L. Cieri, G. Ferrera, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 082001 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations