Skip to main content

Inclusive Systemic Design for Health System Flourishment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Design

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 8))

Abstract

Flourishment is conceptualized as an engagement experience associated with eudaimonic flourishing, a component of psychological wellbeing. Analogous to nourishment, flourishment drives a sense of being one’s authentic best self (eudaimonia) in a way that can be deliberately encouraged and registered within health systems, and their records, by design. Here, frameworks of social neuroscience, social fields, and inclusive human-centred design are elaborated into a framework synthesis for guiding systemic design of a system for registering evidence of patient experienced flourishment. Systemic design considerations are described for a registry of personal records of eudaimonic flourishment and enhanced resilience (PREFER). These are illustrated through description of patient engagement with the suggested PREFER registry elements. Their use in promoting a virtuous cycle of flourishment transactions within a system of patient-centred collaborative care for a person living with chronic pain is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2013). Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: Towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(3), 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1054–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsook, D., Edwards, R., Elman, I., Becerra, L., & Levine, J. (2013). Pain and analgesia: The value of salience circuits. Progress in Neurobiology, 104, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauda, F., Torta, D. M. E, Sacco, K., Geda, E., D’Agata, F., Costa, T., et al. (2012). Shared “core” areas between the pain and other task-related networks. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e41929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Depeltau, F. (2015). Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (2015). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. A., Pepe, A. A., & Murphy, L. L. (2005). Hedonomics: The power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design, 13(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harle, C. A., Marlow, N. M., Schmidt, S. O. F., Shuster, J. J., Listhaus, A., Fillingim, R. B., et al. (2016). The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care. American Journal of Managed Care, 22(12), e403–e408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, M., Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., van der Horst, H., Jadad, A. R., Kromhout, D., et al. (2011). How should we define health? British Medical Journal, 343, d4163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huvila, I., Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., & Åhlfeldt, R. (2015). Patients’ perceptions of their medical records from different subject positions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2456–2470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ing, D. (2013). Rethinking systems thinking: Learning and coevolving with the world. System Research and Behavioural Science, 30(5), 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irizarry, T., De Vito Dabbs, A., & Curran, C. R. (2015). Patient portals and patient engagement: A state of the science review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(6), e148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. H. (2014a). Systemic design principles for complex social systems. In Metcalf, G. S. (Ed). Social systems and design (Translational Systems Sciences 1) (pp. 91–128). Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. H. (2014b). Design research methods for systemic design: Perspectives from design education and practice. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, ISSS 2014, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. J., & Topol, E. J. (2015). Unpatients—why patients should own their medical data. Nature Biotechnology, 33(9), 921–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahka, F., Pennefather, P., Ballantyne, P., Badr, H. E., Agboatwalla, M., & Mailis, A. (2015). Framework for characterizing services for the management of chronic non-cancer pain in global cities. Pain Research and Management, 20(3), 164–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, K. D., Mandel, J. C., & Kohane, I. S. (2015). Driving innovation in health systems through an apps-based information economy. Cell Systems, 1(1), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, E. A., & Renken, M. D. (2011). Eudaimonic conceptions of well-being, meaning in life, and self-reported well-being: Initial test of a mediational model. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 589–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. F., Gregor, P., Morgan, M., Pullin, G., & Macaulay, C. (2011). User-sensitive inclusive design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10(3), 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, A. (2014). Personality psychology as the integrative study of traits and worldviews. New Ideas in Psychology, 32(1), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rämö, H. (2004). Moments of trust: Temporal and spatial factors of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(8), 760–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H., & Morley, S. (2015). Action identification and meaning in life in chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 9, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundell, J. R. (2017). The COMPASS initiative: Implementing a complex integrated care program. General Hospital Psychiatry, 44, 67–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaborn, K., Pennefather, P., & Fels, D. (2015). Eudaimonia in human factors research and practice: Foundations and conceptual framework. Paper presented at the ICT4AgeingWell 2015 – Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, pp. 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachak, A., & Jadad, A. R. (2010). Electronic health records in the age of social networks and global telecommunications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(5), 452–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Still, J. D., & Dark, V. J. (2013). Cognitively describing and designing affordances. Design Studies, 34(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taha, J., Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., & Morrow, D. G. (2013). Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health. Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 1124–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E., & Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veehof, M. M., Trompetter, H. R., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Schreurs, K. M. G. (2016). Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A meta-analytic review. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 45(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Bede Agocha, V., et al. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. C. D. C. (2017). Patient action as means and end of chronic pain care: Risks and routes to meaningful action. Pain, 158(8), 1403–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, W. E., Tillman, B., & Tillman, P. L. (1992). Human factors design handbook (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Pennefather .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pennefather, P., Seaborn, K., Fels, D.I. (2018). Inclusive Systemic Design for Health System Flourishment. In: Jones, P., Kijima, K. (eds) Systemic Design. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 8. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics