Skip to main content

Offshoring of Engineering Labor in Japanese Manufacturing SMEs: Evolution of the “Comprehensive Offshoring” Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 383 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 17))

Abstract

While offshoring provides a significant opportunity for industrial development in emerging economies, it has been a quite controversial issue for developed economies mainly because of its impact on employment, especially of knowledge-intensive jobs. Although some data show the increase of the amount and extent of work that is relocated from Japan to emerging economies, little is known about the offshoring of high-value-added jobs including engineering labor. It is in this context that this chapter addresses two related questions by examining Japan’s die and mold industry: (1) To what extent do Japanese firms relocate jobs to emerging economies, and (2) why are Japanese firms engaging in offshoring more than ever? We argue that the offshoring practice has been evolved from partial offshoring to comprehensive offshoring and explore forces behind this evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I follow the definition of “offshoring” given in Chap. 1 (Hirakawa) of this volume. Offshoring is divided into “captive offshoring,” in which work is relocated to foreign affiliates of that company, and “offshore outsourcing,” in which work is relocated to other firms located in foreign countries. According to Tomiura (2014), 39.1 % of offshoring by Japanese firms consisted of captive offshoring in 2007.

  2. 2.

    Fragmentation itself is not a new phenomenon and has significantly influenced the international division of labor since the 1970s. For example, Frobel et al. (1981) analyzed how and why manufacturing activities in advanced economies have relocated to latecomer economies and how this relocation affected advanced economies.

  3. 3.

    Brown et al. (2011) defined digital Taylorism as “translating the knowledge of managers, professionals, and technicians into working knowledge by capturing, codifying, and digitalizing their work in software packages, templates, and prescripts that can be transferred and manipulated by others regardless of location” (p. 72).

  4. 4.

    In the analysis, engineers predict possible problems that might arise when the dies and molds are used to produce parts, during which CAE tools are used (Aoyama 2011).

  5. 5.

    Competent engineering firms are much more densely populated in Japan than in Vietnam. In a survey conducted by the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO), while 22.9 % of the respondents answered “yes” when asked whether they would decide to invest in Thailand because of the dense clustering of engineering firms, only 1.9 % answered “yes” when the same question was asked of the investment in Vietnam (JETRO 2013, A Survey on Business Activities of Japanese Firms in Asia and Oceania).

  6. 6.

    This case is comparable to that of the semiconductor foundry firms in Taiwan. Tokumaru (2005) argued that they were not merely low-value-added, cheap manufacturers, but high-value-added integrators between design and production. Although it was true that they specialized in manufacturing chips and chips were designed by customers, they also had the design capabilities to provide customers with design services that were completely adapted to their manufacturing technologies. It is in this sense that they provided not only the production capacity but also integration capacity, which was needed because the decoupling between design and production was far from perfect in the semiconductor industry then, as in the case of the die and mold industry.

References

  • Ando M, Kimura F (2009) Fragmentation in East Asia: further evidence. ERIA Discussion Paper Series DP-2009-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoyama H (2011) Kanagata seisaku wo sasaeru CAD/CAM/CAE renkei gijutsu (CAD/CAM/CAE technologies supporting die and mold production). Seimitsu Kougakkai Shi (Precis Eng) 77(7):636–639 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labor. Res Policy 23(5):523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baba T (2010) Betonamu kanagata sangyo no genjo to hatten dankai nit suite (The development stage of Vietnamese die and mold industries: from a field survey and statistics). Keizai Shirin 77(4):413–454 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair J, Mahutga MC (2012) Varieties of offshoring?: Spatial fragmentation and the organization of production in twenty-first century capitalism. In: Morgan G, Whitley R (eds) Capitalisms and capitalism in the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 271–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS (2009) How many US jobs might be offshorable? World Economics 10(2):41–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Lauder H, Ashton D (2011) The global auction: the broken promises of education, jobs and incomes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Crinò R (2010) Service offshoring and white-collar employment. Rev Econ Stud 77(2):595–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frobel J, Heinrichs J, Kreye O (1981) The new international division of labour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto T, Amano T, Shintaku J (2007) Akitekucha ni motoduku hikakuyui to kokusaibungyo (Comparative advantage based on product architectures and international division of labor). Soshiki Kagaku 40(4):51–64 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall D, Soskice D (eds) (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori T (2007) Higashi ajia keizai no hatten to nihon: kumitategata kogyoka to boueki kankei (Development of the East Asian economies and Japan: assembly-led industrialization and trade relations). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirakawa H, Lal K, Shinkai N, Tokumaru N (eds) (2013) Servitization, it-ization and innovation models: two-stage industrial cluster theory. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Bank for International Cooperation (2014) Wagakuni seizogyo kigyo no kaigaijigyotenkai ni kansuru tyosa hokoku (Survey report on overseas operation by Japanese manufacturing companies)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney M, Massini S, Murtha TP (2009) Offshoring administrative and technical work: new fields for understanding the global enterprise. J Int Bus Stud 40(6):887–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C (2009) Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. J Int Bus Stud 40(6):901–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning S, Massini S, Lewin AY (2008) A dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: the global sourcing of science and engineering talent. Acad Manage Perspect 22(3):35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milberg W, Winkler D (2013) Outsourcing economics: global value chains in capitalist development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slepniov D, Larsen M, Waehrens BV, Pedersen T, Johansen J (2013) Offshoring white-collar work: an explorative investigation of the processes and mechanisms in two Danish manufacturing firms. In: Pedersen T, Bals L, Jensen PDØ, Larsen MM (eds) The offshoring challenge: strategic design and innovation for tomorrow’s organization. Springer, London, pp 123–140

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi N (2011) Sangyo gijutsu kyosoryoku to kanagata sangyo (Die and mold industry and technological and industrial competitiveness). Minerva Shobo, Kyoto (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokumaru N (2005) Codification of technological knowledge, technological complexity and division of innovative labour: a case from the semiconductor industry in the 1990s. In: Finch JH, Orillard M (eds) Complexity and the economy: implication for economic policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 237–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomiura E (2014) Autososhingu no kokusaikeizaigaku (International economics of outsourcing: changing global trade and micro data analysis of Japanese firms). Nihon Hyoron Sha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshitomi M (2003) Ajia keizai no shinjitsu (Truth of the Asian economies). Toyo Keizai Shinposha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norio Tokumaru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tokumaru, N. (2017). Offshoring of Engineering Labor in Japanese Manufacturing SMEs: Evolution of the “Comprehensive Offshoring” Model. In: Hirakawa, H., Takahashi, N., Maquito, F., Tokumaru, N. (eds) Innovative ICT Industrial Architecture in East Asia. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 17. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55630-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics