Advertisement

Expansion of Free Trade Agreements, Overlapping Free Trade Agreements,and Market Size

  • Ryoichi NomuraEmail author
  • Takao Ohkawa
  • Makoto Okamura
  • Makoto Tawada
Chapter
  • 423 Downloads
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 10)

Abstract

This chapter investigates whether the formation of bilateral overlapping free trade agreements (FTAs) between dissimilar countries becomes a building block or a stumbling block for multilateral free trade (MFT). Our main conclusions are as follows. Suppose that a bilateral FTA between symmetric countries is already formed. (i) A bilateral FTA becomes a stumbling block for MFT through overlapping FTAs, while it acts as a building block for MFT through expansion of FTAs when market sizes of member and nonmember countries are quite similar. (ii) When the market size of a nonmember country is smaller than that of member countries, then overlapping FTAs lead to MFT, while FTA expansion may or may not. (iii) If the nonmember country of the original FTA is large, then expansion of the FTA may not achieve MFT, while overlapping FTAs cannot. (iv) When the market size of the nonmember country is quite large compared with member countries, MFT never arises through overlapping FTAs, FTA expansion, or negotiation of a multilateral trade agreement.

Keywords

Expansion of FTA Overlapping FTA Hub and spoke Building block Stumbling block 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (no. 23530303, 26380340, and 26380318). All remaining errors are ours.

References

  1. Aghion, P., P. Antràs, and E. Helpman. 2007. Negotiating free trade. Journal of International Economics 73: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagwell, K., and R.W. Staiger. 1999. Regionalism and multilateral tariff cooperation. In International trade policy and the Pacific Rim, eds. J. Pigott and A. Woodland, 157–185. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R.E. 2006. Multilateralising regionalism: Spaghetti bowls as building blocks on the path to global free trade. The World Economy 29: 1451–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhagwati, J.N. 1993. Regionalism and multilateralism: An overview. In New Dimensions in Regional integration, eds. J. de Melo and A. Panagariya, 22–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwati, J.N. 2008. Termites in the trading system: How preferential agreements undermine free trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Endoh, M. 2006. Quality of governance and the formation of preferential trade agreements. Review of International Economics 14: 758–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fiorentino, R.V., J.-N. Crawford, and C. Toqueboeuf. 2009. The landscape of regional trade agreements and WTO surveillance. In Multilateralizing regionalism, eds. R. Baldwin and P. Low, 28–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freund, C. 2000. Multilateralism and the endogenous formation of preferential trade agreements. Journal of International Economics 52: 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krishna, P. 1998. Regionalism and multilateralism: A political economy approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mukunoki, H., and K. Tachi. 2006. Multilateralism and hub-and-spoke bilateralism. Review of International Economics 14: 658–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nomura, R., T. Ohkawa, M. Okamura, and M. Tawada. 2013. Does a bilateral FTA pave the way for multilateral free trade? Review of International Economics 21: 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ornelas, E. 2005a. Endogenous free trade agreements and the multilateral trading system. Journal of International Economics 67: 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ornelas, E. 2005b. Trade creating free trade areas and the undermining of multilateralism. European Economic Review 49: 1717–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Panagariya, A. 2000. Preferential trade liberalization: The traditional theory and new developments. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 287–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Saggi, K. 2006. Preferential trade agreement and multilateral tariff cooperation. International Economic Review 47: 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saggi, K., and H. M. Yildiz. 2010. Bilateralism, multilateralism, and the quest for global free trade. Journal of Internationla Economics 81: 26–37.Google Scholar
  17. Watts, A. 2001. A dynamic model of network formation. Games and Economic Behavior 34: 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. World Trade Organization. 2015. Regional trade agreement. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm. Accessed 9 Nov 2015.Google Scholar
  19. Yi, S.-S. 1996. Endogenous formation of custom unions under imperfect competition: Open regionalism is good. Journal of International Economics 41: 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yi, S.-S. 2000. Free-trade areas and welfare: An equilibrium analysis. Review of International Economics 8: 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryoichi Nomura
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takao Ohkawa
    • 1
  • Makoto Okamura
    • 2
  • Makoto Tawada
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsRitsumeikan UniversityKusatsuJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsGakushuin UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of EconomicsAichi Gakuin UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations