Advertisement

Theory for Behavior Modification Process for Cooperation

  • Satoshi Fujii
Chapter

Abstract

The reason why the three psychological factors, knowledge, trust, and moral obligation explained in the previous chapter facilitate people’s cooperation is because a social dilemma has its own unique benefit structure. That is to say, because there exists a social situation which involves such relationships with others as competition and cooperation, these three factors can facilitate people’s cooperation.

Keywords

Psychological Factor Behavioral Intention Behavioral Control Moral Obligation Cooperative Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bamberg, S. (2002a). Effects of implementation intentions on the actual performance of new environmentally friendly behaviors: Results of two field experiments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bamberg, S. (2002b). Implementation intention versus monetary incentive comparing the effects of interventions to promote the purchase of organically produced food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit?: Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen. Schwartz, and Triandis, Environment & Behavior, 35(2), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, X. P., Au, W. T., & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Sequential choice in a step-level public goods dilemma: The effects of Criticality and uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 65(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cremer, D. D., & van Dijk, E. (2002). Perceived criticality and contributions in public good dilemmas: A matter of feeling responsible to all? Group Process & Intergroup Relations, 5(4), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habit: Propensity levels in behavioral change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 588–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forth Worth, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  12. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Fujii, S. (2001a). Social behavioral theories for infrastructure planning: from attitude-based planning toward attitude-modification planning, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 688/IV-53, 19–35. (in Japanese with English Abstract).Google Scholar
  14. Fujii, S. (2002c). Social psychological approach to transportation behavior analysis. In R. Kitamura & T. Morikawa (Eds.), Analyzing and modeling travel behavior. Gihodo Shuppan (pp. 35–52). (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  15. Fujii, S., & Taniguchi, A. (2003). Reducing family car use by providing travel advice or requesting behavioral plans: An experimental analysis of travel behavior feedback programs. In Prepared for 9th International Association for Travel Behavior Research Conference, Lucerne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  16. Fujii, S., Gärling, T., & Kitamura, R. (2001a). Changes in drivers’ perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: Effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma. Environment and Behavior, 33(6), 796–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujii, S., Kobata, A., & Kitamura, R. (2001b). Persuasive communication for illegal bicycle parking. In Collected Papers of the 42nd Conference for the Japanese Society of Social Psychology, pp. 264–265. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  18. Fujii, S., Kobata, A., & Kitamura, R. (2002). Persuasive communication for illegal bicycle parking: A psychological solution for social dilemmas. Infrastructure Planning Review, 19(1), 439–446. (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gärling, T., & Fujii, S. (2002). Structural equation modeling of determinants of planning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gärling, T., Fujii, S., & Boe, O. (2001). Empirical tests of a model of determinants of script-based driving choice. Transportation Research F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 4, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavioral change. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gillholm, R., Ettema, D., Selart, M., & Gärling, T. (1999). The role of planning for intention-behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gillholm, R., Erdeus, J., & Gärling, T. (2000). The effect of choice on intention-behavior consistency. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 141–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 287–312). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matthies, E., Kuhn, S., & Klöcker, C. A. (2002). Travel mode choice of women: The result of limitation, ecological norm, or weak habit? Environment and Behavior, 34(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 945–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oullette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ronis, D. L., Yates, J. F., & Kirscht, J. P. (1989). Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 213–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. IN L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 222–280). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Black, J. S. (1986). Support for environmental protection: The role of social norms. Population and Environment, 8, 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strobe, A., & Frey, B. S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taniguchi, A., Hara, F., Takano, S., Kagaya, S., & Fujii, S. (2003). Psychological and behavioral effects of travel feedback program for travel behavioral modification. Transportation Research Record, 1839, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thøgersen, J. (1996). Recycling and morality: A critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28, 536–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz’s norm-activation model to yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude and planned behaviour: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automatic? European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A., & Moonen, A. (1999). Habit versus planned behavior: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban ManagementKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations