Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify the mechanism of how information technology (IT) creates business value, particularly from the viewpoint of IT management in individual companies. To do this, we developed a hypothetical structural model that consists of six performance indicators, namely: awareness and actions of top management, linkage between management and IT, IT development capability, IT investment and deployment, IT readiness, and business value creation from IT. Based on analyses of data collected from 509 major companies comprising various types of business in Japan, we found that awareness and actions of top management lead to business value creation from IT via other intermediate factors, such as linkage between management and IT, etc. Based on the structural model, we propose a framework called “IT management effectiveness”, by which the overall effectiveness of IT management is measurable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bensaou, M., & Earl, M. (1998). The right mind-set for managing information technology. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 118–128.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equation with latent variables. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox: Computers are the catalyst for bigger changes. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49–55.
Earl, M. J. (1996). Integrating IS and the organization: A framework of organizational fit. In M. J. Earl (Ed.), Information management. New York: Oxford University Press.
Henderson, J. C., Venkatraman, N., & Oldach, S. (1993). Continuous strategic alignment. European Management Journal, 11(2), 193–149.
Kadono, Y., & Tsubaki, H. (2002). How IT create business value. Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).
Kadono, Y. (2004). Evolution of IT management creating business value. Tokyo: Nikkagiren.
Kohili, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23–39.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2014). Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award. http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/about/improvement_act.cfm. Accessed 14 Aug 2014.
Orlikowski, W., & Hofman, J. D. (winter 1997). An improvisational model for change management: the case of group technologies. Sloan Management Review.
Parker, M. M., & Benson, R. J. (1988). Information economics: Linking business performance to information technology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. (1998). Information rules. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
Nihon Keizai Shimbun. (2013). NICES. http://www.nikkei-r.co.jp/domestic/management/nices/. Accessed 14 Aug 2014.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1993). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Strassman, P. (1990). Business value of computers. Information Economic Press.
Tam, K. Y. (1998). The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: Evidence from newly industrialized economies. Information Systems Research, 9(1), 58–98.
U.S.A. Department of Commerce. (2000). The emerging digital economy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kadono, Y. (2015). IT Management Effectiveness: An Empirical Study in Japanese Companies. In: Management of Software Engineering Innovation in Japan. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55612-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55612-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55611-4
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55612-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)