Abstract
In Chap. 2, to solve the issues relating to managing innovation in the Japanese software industry as mentioned in Chap. 1, we aim to assess the achievements of the software engineering capabilities as represented by IT vendors in Japan; we additionally aim to better understand the mechanisms of how software engineering capabilities relate to IT vendors’ business performance and business environment. To this end we designed a research survey to investigate software engineering excellence (SEE); we administered it together with METI and IPA. SEE was originally developed based on interviews conducted with over 50 experts in academic, business, and governmental circles in Japan and the U.S. and on literature searches in the field of software engineering in a broad sense, as we reviewed in Chap. 1. Therefore, SEE can be used to evaluate the overall software engineering capabilities of IT vendors with regard to the following seven factors: Deliverables, Project Management, Quality Assurance, Process Improvement, Research and Development, Human Resource Development, and Customer Contact. We introduced two additional primary indicators as well: Business Performance, e.g., profitability, growth, productivity, and efficiency of management, and Business Environment, e.g., origin of vendor, number of software engineers, average age of employees, business model, customer base, and corporate culture. The SEE survey resulted in 233 valid responses. We found that vendors with a larger number of software engineers tended to obtain a higher SEE score, as did vendors whose employees were older, though they tended to be less profitable. Finally, there was no significant relationship between the SEE score and operating profit ratio of the IT vendors in Japan. Because the SEE survey results are precious pieces of information in the study of the Japan’s software industry, the detailed findings are demonstrated in Chap. 2, and figures relating to the survey results are included in Appendix.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barney, J. B. (2007). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Carnegie Mellon University. (2014). Software engineering institute. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/. Accessed 14 Aug 2014.
Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2008). The management of technological innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fujimoto, T. (2003). Capability-building competition. Chuohkouronshinsya.
IEEE, Computer Society. (2013). SWEBOK V 3.0.
Japan Information Technology Service Industry Association (JISA). (2014). Research on IT human resources and training measures for globalization. http://itjobgate.jisa.or.jp/world/index.html. Accessed 14 Aug 2014.
ISO. (2010). ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2010 systems and software engineering–vocabulary.
Kadono, Y., Tsubaki. H., & Tsuruho, S. (2006). A study on the reality and economy of software development in Japan. In Proceedings of the sixth Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering Management Systems Conference, Bangkok, Thailand (pp. 1425–1433).
Kadono, Y., Tsubaki, H., & Tsuruho, S. (2012). Structural relationships among software engineering capabilities in Japan. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 12(2), 217–227.
Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI). (2014) Current survey on selected service industries: Information service industry.
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Information-Technology Promotion Agency, Japan.(METI & IPA). (2007). Fact-finding investigation on software engineering capabilities of enterprise systems in Japan. (The responsibility for the investigation lies with Yasuo Kadono). sec.ipa.go.jp/reports/20071204/SE_level_research_2006_2.pdf.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC). (2013). White paper—information and communications in Japan.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review.
Pressman, R. S. (2010). Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Project Management Institute. (2014). A guide to project management body of knowledge (PMBOK). Project Management Institute. http://www.pmi.org/PMBOK-Guide-and-Standards/Standards-Library-of-PMI-Global-Standards.aspx. Accessed 14 Aug 2014.
SAP. Invester relations. (2014). http://www.sap.com/corporate-en/about/investors.html.
Stauss, B., Engelmann, K., Kremer, A., & Luhn, A. (2008). Services science: Fundamentals, challenges and future developments. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation (5th ed.). Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kadono, Y. (2015). The Surveys on Software Engineering Excellence. In: Management of Software Engineering Innovation in Japan. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55612-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55612-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55611-4
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55612-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)