Reduced Port Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection

Chapter

Abstract

In the past decade, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has shown acceptable results in a number of surgical interventions including colorectal procedures for benign and malignant diseases. However, the acceptance of SILS in the lower rectum has been hampered by its technical difficulties and concern over oncological outcome. More recently, increased experience, safety, and feasibility of SILS for rectal lesions in short-term outcomes have started to be reported. Many of them adopted an additional port for traction or transection of the rectum in the case of a very low rectal lesion, which is generally called “reduced port laparoscopic surgery.” SILS or reduced port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (RPLAPR) is a relatively new technique in the minimally invasive surgery era, and there are only a few reports on this topic. In this chapter, we introduce the surgical technique of SILS or RPLAPR in our center and short-term outcomes with a literature review.

Keywords

Reduced port laparoscopic surgery Single-port laparoscopic surgery Rectal cancer Reduced port laparoscopic APR Single-port laparoscopic APR 

References

  1. 1.
    Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(7):637–45. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(1):75–82. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8945.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–8. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70016-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2015.
  5. 5.
    Esposito C. One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(2):177–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maggiori L, Gaujoux S, Tribillon E, Bretagnol F, Panis Y. Single incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures. Color Dis. 2012; doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03105.x.
  7. 7.
    Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012; doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2262-z.
  8. 8.
    Reibetanz J, Kerscher A, Kim M, Wierlemann A, Germer CT, Krajinovic K. Early-elective single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis using a totally reusable single-port device. Surg Innov. 2012;19(1):45–9. doi: 10.1177/1553350611413610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waters JA, Rapp BM, Guzman MJ, Jester AL, Selzer DJ, Robb BW, et al. Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(2):134–9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):667–76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823fbae7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tokuoka M, Ide Y, Takeda M, Hashimoto Y, Matsuyama J, Yokoyama S, et al. Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: a case report. Int Surg. 2015;100(1):15–20. doi: 10.9738/intsurg-d-14-00232.1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perdawood SK, Lund T. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(3):145–52. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1243-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bae SU, Baek SJ, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK, Hur H. Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for a tumor-specific mesorectal excision in patients with colorectal cancer: initial experience with 20 consecutive cases. Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):16–22. doi: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lolle I, Rosenstock S, Bulut O. Single-port laparoscopic rectal surgery – a systematic review. Dan Med J. 2014;61(7):A4878.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jung KU, Yun SH, Cho YB, Kim HC, Lee WY, Chun HK. Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial experience in 96 cases. ANZ J Surg. 2014; doi: 10.1111/ans.12775.
  16. 16.
    Bulut O, Aslak KK, Rosenstock S. Technique and short-term outcomes of single-port surgery for rectal cancer: a feasibility study of 25 patients. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(1):26–33. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vestweber B, Galetin T, Lammerting K, Paul C, Giehl J, Straub E, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):434–42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2454-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sourrouille I, Dumont F, Goere D, Honore C, Elias D. Resection of rectal cancer via an abdominal single-port access: short-term results and comparison with standard laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(11):1203–10. doi: 10.1007/dcr.12345678787890. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sirikurnpiboon S, Jivapaisarnpong P. Single-access laparoscopic rectal surgery is technically feasible. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:687134. doi: 10.1155/2013/687134.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lauritsen ML, Bulut O. Single-port access laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection through the colostomy site: a case report. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16(2):175–7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0694-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirano Y, Hattori M, Douden K, Shimizu S, Sato Y, Maeda K, et al. Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer as a reduced port surgery. Scand J Surg. 2012;101(4):283–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hara M, Sato M, Takayama S, Imafuji H, Ogawa R, Takeyama H. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with a SILS port for very low rectal cancer: a case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(3):e138–41. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318248b446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hua-Feng P, Zhi-Wei J, Gang W, Xin-Xin L, Feng-Tao L. A novel approach for the resection of low rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(6):537–41. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826d67e4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ali S, Moftah M, Ajmal N, Cahill RA. Single port-assisted fully laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) with immediate V-RAM flap reconstruction of the perineal defect. Updat Surg. 2012;64(3):217–21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-012-0158-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bulut O, Nielsen CB, Jespersen N. Single-port access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: initial experience with 10 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(7):803–9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182147b4d.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineGangnam-gu, SeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung HospitalSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations