Skip to main content

Reduced Port Laparoscopic TME with Coloanal Anastomosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1113 Accesses

Abstract

We began performing a single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection of the rectum (SILS+1-AR) in August 2010. In recent years, intersphincteric resection (ISR) is proposed as a means of offering sphincter preservation in patients with very low rectal cancer and has become an accepted surgical procedure. Moreover, the procedure of ultralow anterior resection mainly includes an ISR for sphincter-saving operation. Therefore, we applied SILS+1 partial ISR in cases of rectal cancer located within 5 cm from the anal verge.

In the SILS+1-AR without ISR, a 3-cm trans-umbilical incision was made, and the SILS™ port was inserted, and an additional 12-mm trocar was placed in the right lower quadrant. In the SILS+1 partial ISR, a SILS™ port was placed in the right lower quadrant at the intended ileostomy site, and a 5-mm trocar was inserted at the umbilicus at the subsequent drain site. The surgical procedure of partial ISR included five stages: colonic mobilization, pelvic dissection with total mesorectal excision (TME), transabdominal dissection of the intersphincteric space, stapled coloanal anastomosis, and diverting stoma. All postoperative outcomes were satisfactory (data not shown).

Reduced port laparoscopic TME for rectal carcinoma with or without ISR can be performed safely, and its feasibility depends on proper selection of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Ahmed K, Wang TT, Patel VM, Nagpal K, Clark J, Ali M, et al. The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):378–96. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1208-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fichera A, Zoccali M, Gullo R. Single incision (“scarless”) laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(7):1247–51. doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1440-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Egi H, Hattori M, Hinoi T, Takakura Y, Kawaguchi Y, Shimomura M, et al. Single-port laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: a comparison of surgical results. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:61. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-10-61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chambers WM, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M, Dixon AR. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(4):393–8. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02158.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawamata F, Homma S, Minagawa N, Kawamura H, Takahashi N, Taketomi A. Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2014;38(10):2716–23. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2642-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Osborne AJ, Lim J, Gash KJ, Chaudhary B, Dixon AR. Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic high anterior resection with standard laparoscopic high anterior resection. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(3):329–33. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03178.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimitriou N, Michail O, Moris D, Griniatsos J. Low rectal cancer: sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7(7):55–70. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v7.i7.55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2012;17(1):1–29. doi:10.1007/s10147-011-0315-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M. Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(1):18–23. doi:10.3109/13645700903492969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chi P, Huang SH, Lin HM, Lu XR, Huang Y, Jiang WZ, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal approach partial intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: surgical feasibility and intermediate-term outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):944–51. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4085-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Sugito M. Sphincter-saving resection for low rectal cancer. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;112(5):318–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(11):3608–15. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3762-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Johansson H, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, et al. Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm. Br J Surg. 2005;92(2):225–9. doi:10.1002/bjs.4834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tilney HS, Rasheed S, Northover JM, Tekkis PP. The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(10):1723–9. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b54fbd.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishikawa T, Homma S, Shibasaki S, Yoshida T, Minagawa N, Kawamura H, et al. Dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using the intended stoma site as the multichannel port. Surg Today. 2015;45(12):1583–7. doi:10.1007/s00595-015-1224-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirano Y, Hattori M, Douden K, Shimizu S, Sato Y, Maeda K, et al. Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer as a reduced port surgery. Scand J Surg. 2012;101(4):283–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim SW, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Umbilical incision laparoscopic colectomy with one additional port for colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(2):193–9. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0900-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(11):1549–54. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e85875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigenori Homma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Homma, S. et al. (2018). Reduced Port Laparoscopic TME with Coloanal Anastomosis. In: Dapri, G., Marks, J. (eds) Surgical Techniques in Rectal Cancer. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55579-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55579-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55578-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55579-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics