Multiport Laparoscopic TME with Coloanal Anastomosis

  • Bart van Geluwe
  • Quentin Denost
  • Eric Rullier


Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard technique for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Despite the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic TME is a technically challenging procedure with a long learning curve. Quality of surgery is evaluated by completeness of the mesorectal envelope and resection margins. Other objectives are sphincter preservation and functional outcome. The concept for sphincter-saving resection is related to the distance between the tumor and the anal sphincter. It is now generally accepted that involvement of circumferential resection margin (CRM) is an important risk factor of local recurrence, and considerably circumferential resection margin is more relevant than the distal resection margin. The technique of intersphincteric resection has been developed to move to a more conservative (sphincter salvage) concept in lower rectal cancer. In this chapter we describe step-by-step our standardized technique of multiport laparoscopic TME, with or without an intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.


Coloanal anastomosis Intersphincteric Low rectal cancer Sphincter saving 


  1. 1.
    Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin N, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, et al. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2002;235:449–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimeter rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and patients survival. Br J Surg. 1983;70:150–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pollett WG, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1983;198:159–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishikawa K, Fujimoto H, Shinto E, Hase K. Preoperative parameters expanding the indication of sphincter preserving surgery in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;239:34–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rullier A, Laurent C. Recommendations for clinical practice. Therapeutic choices for rectal cancer. What quality criteria are important for surgical excision of rectal cancer? Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2007;31:1S34–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, Moran B, Blomgvist L, Swift I, et al. One millimeter is the safe cut-off for magnetic resonance imaging prediction of surgical margin status in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98:872–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, Rullier A, Laurent C. Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:560–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:637–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II tial). N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dowdall JF, Maguire D, McAnena OJ. Experience of surgery for rectal cancer with total mesorectal excision in a general surgical practice. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1014–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, et al. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1205–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knol J, Dhondt M, Souverijns G, Heald B, Vangertruyden G. Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision: technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below – a preliminary report. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(2):69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261:221–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC, et al. Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:408–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Velthuis S, Nieuwenhuis DH, Ruijter TEG, et al. Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3494–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Denost Q, Adam JP, Rullier A, Buscail E, Vendrely V, Rullier E. Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2014;260:993–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bart van Geluwe
    • 1
  • Quentin Denost
    • 1
  • Eric Rullier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-André Hospital, CHU BordeauxUniversity of BordeauxBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations