Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Automated Negotiations Based on Monotonic Tree Representations

  • Chapter
Next Frontier in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiation

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 596))

Abstract

Automated negotiations occur when a negotiating function is performed among intelligent agents. Although current human-to-human negotiation appears to involve multiple extremely complex issues, each automated negotiation setting is simple. In particular, the structure of issues is independent and flat in the existing automated negotiation framework. In this paper, we propose realistic negotiation frameworks for non-monotonic utility functions. The monotonicity of the utility functions is an important characteristic because if the utility function is monotonic, the issues are independent. When the issues are independent, it is useful to separate them and reach a distinct agreement for each sequentially. In addition, we propose an automated mediation protocol for multiple non-monotonic issue negotiations. This mediation protocol consists of the communications between agents and the mediator. The procedures of the mediation protocol include recognizing related issues, announcement, bidding, awarding, and expediting. We experimentally demonstrate that the proposed method results in good outcomes and greater scalability. In addition, we demonstrate that a suitable mediation strategy leads to better outcomes and scalability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. An, B., Lesser, V.R., Irwin, D., Zink, M.: Automated negotiation with decommitment for dynamic resource allocation in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2010), pp. 981–988 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: a tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. Artif. Intell. Res. 21, 135–191 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chevaleyre, Y., Endriss, U., Maudet, N.: Tractable negotiation in tree-structured domains. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS2006), pp. 362–369 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artif. Intell. 142, 205–237 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujita, K., Ito, T., Klein, M.: An approach to scalable multi-issue negotiation: decomposing the contract space. Comput. Intell. (2012). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00462.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujita, K., Ito, T., Klein, M.: A secure and fair protocol that addresses weaknesses of the Nash bargaining solution in nonlinear negotiation. Group Decis. Negot. 21, 29–47 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujita, K., Ito, T., Klein, M.: Efficient issue-grouping approach for multiple interdependent issues negotiation between exaggerator agents. Decis. Support Syst. (2013). doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hindriks, K., Jonker, C., Tykhonov, D.: Eliminating interdependencies between issues for multi-issue negotiation. Cooperative Information Agents X. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4149, pp. 301–316. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ito, T., Hattori, H., Klein, M.: Multi-issue negotiation protocol for agents: exploring nonlinear utility spaces. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2007), pp. 1347–1352 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Int. J. Group Decis. Negot. 10(2), 199–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. J. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. (JAAMAS) 15, 221–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., Bar-Yam, Y.: Negotiating complex contracts. Group Decis. Negot. 12(2), 58–73 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lai, J., Parkes, D.: Monotone branch-and-bound search for restricted combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’12), pp. 705–722 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Landsberger, M., Meilijson, I.: Co-monotone allocations, Bickel-Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion. Ann. Oper. Res. 52, 97–106 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Commun. ACM 53(1), 78–88 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Oshrat, Y., Gal, Y.K.: Facilitating the evaluation of automated negotiators using peer designed agents. In: Proceedings of the 24th Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2010) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez-Carmona, M., Marsa-Maestre, I., Klein, M., Ito, T.: Addressing stability issues in mediated complex contract negotiations for constraint-based, non-monotonic utility spaces. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 24(3), 485–535 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo, X., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N., Leung, H., Lee, J.H.: A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artif. Intell. 148, 53–102 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo, X., Lee, J.H.M., Leung, H.F., Jennings, N.R.: Prioritised fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems: axioms, instantiation and validation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 136, 151–188 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Malone, T.W., Klein, M.: Harnessing collective intelligence to address global climate change. Innov. J. 2(3), 15–26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ren, F., Zhang, M.: Bilateral single-issue negotiation model considering nonlinear utility and time constraint. Decis. Support Syst. (2013). doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robu, V., Poutre, H.L.: Retrieving the structure of utility graphs used in multi-item negotiation through collaborative filtering of aggregate buyer preferences. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Rational, Robust, and Secure Negotiations in Multi-Agent Systems (RRS-2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robu, V., Somefun, D.J.A., Poutre, J.L.: Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp. 280–287 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandholm, T.W.: Distributed rational decision making. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Multi-Agent Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, R.G.: The contract net protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Trans. Comput. 29(12), 1104–1113 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

    Katsuhide Fujita

Authors
  1. Katsuhide Fujita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuhide Fujita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

    Katsuhide Fujita

  2. School of Techno-Business Administration, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Japan

    Takayuki Ito

  3. School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

    Minjie Zhang

  4. School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Valentin Robu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fujita, K. (2015). Automated Negotiations Based on Monotonic Tree Representations. In: Fujita, K., Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V. (eds) Next Frontier in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiation. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 596. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55525-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55525-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55524-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55525-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation