Advertisement

Taxation by the Tibetan Authorities and the Formation of Fortresses

  • Kazuharu Mizuno
  • Lobsang Tenpa
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives in Geography book series (IPG, volume 6)

Abstract

The Tibetan government set up fortresses, locally called dzong [rdzong], at several locations in Monyul as administrative offices for the purpose of collecting taxes. The dzong also functioned as administrative centers for local communities. In addition, the Tibetan government constructed Tawang Monastery, which exerted an influence on many aspects of the lives of the local inhabitants. Taxes collected from local residents were used by the monastery, and a portion of the taxes was transported to Lhasa. In the early eighteenth century, two administrators dzongpon, one at Dirang and another at Taklung, were appointed for collection of tax as contribution towards the monastery etc. Since 1944, especially in 1946 just before the independence, British-ruled India tried to abolish taxation by dzongpon in the Dirang and Kalaktang areas. However, since the taxation contributed to Tawang Monastery or to locally resettled former officials, the local people themselves continued this practice until 1951. This chapter examines the types of items that were collected as taxes and how the taxes were conveyed to Tawang Monastery and Lhasa. The main focus of this chapter is on the history of the interrelationships among the local people in the Monpa area, Tawang Monastery, and the Tibetan government.

Keywords

Tax Fortress Tibetan government Lhasa Tawang Monastery 

References

  1. Amundsen I (2001) On Bhutanese & Tibetan Dzongs. J Bhutan Stud 5(W):8–41Google Scholar
  2. Barua S, Ahmad SI (1995) Monpa: Kalaktang. In: Dutta P, Ahmad SI (eds) People of India, Arunachal Pradesh. Seagull Books, Calcutta, pp 232–236Google Scholar
  3. Chakravarty LN (1953) Secret: notes on Indo-Tibetan relations. From: 1772–1951 (with special references to the McMahon Line). The Assam Government Press, ShillingGoogle Scholar
  4. Directoral of Research (Archaeological Section) (without date) Taklung Dzong, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. Government of Arunachal Pradesh, ItanagarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorjee R (2006) The Monpas: their social, economic and religious institutions. In: Dutta S, Tripathy B (eds) Buddhism in North-east India. Indus Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 194–203Google Scholar
  6. Kawaguchi E (2012 [1909]) Three years in Tibet. General Books LLCTM, MemphisGoogle Scholar
  7. Narain Jha B (2006) Buddhism, Buddhist monasteries and the societies of the Monyul: a historical study. In: Dutta S, Tripathy B (eds) Buddhism in North-east India. Indus Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 229–240Google Scholar
  8. Sarkar N (1975a) Minor religious structures of the Monpas and Sherdukpens. Resarun 1:150–4Google Scholar
  9. Sarkar N (1975b) Historical account of the introduction of Buddhism among the Monpas and Sherdukpens. Resarun 1:23–44Google Scholar
  10. Sarkar N (1978) A historical account of Tawang Monastery. Res Arunachal 1951–1976:50–57Google Scholar
  11. Sarkar N (1980) Buddhism among the Monpas & the Sherdukpens. Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, ShillongGoogle Scholar
  12. Sarkar N (1981) Tawang Monastery. Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, ShillongGoogle Scholar
  13. Tenpa L (2013) The life & activities of Rgyal sras Blo bzang bstan pa’i sgron me, a 16th century Tibeto-Mon monk from Tawang. Tibet J XXXVIII (3 & 4):55–72Google Scholar
  14. Tenpa L (2014) The centenary of the McMahon Line (1914–2014) and the status of Monyul until 1951–2. Tibet J XXXIX(2):41–86Google Scholar
  15. Thub bstan cos’phel (1988) Hin rdu btsan’dzul dmag gis mon khul du btsan’dzul byas pa’i don dngos. In: Nga phod ngag ‘jigs med (ed) Bod kyi lo rgyus rig gnas dpyad gzhi’i rgyu cha bdams bsgrigs (Selected Research Materials for Tibetan History and Culture: 10, Mi rigs dpe skrun khang: 24–43, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  16. Wakita M (2009) Ethnic dress as representation: a case study of the Monpas of Arunachal Pradesh, India. In: Proceedings of the Graduate School of Human Relations, Keio University, vol 68, pp 35–58 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Yamaguchi Z (1987) Tibet: 1. Toyo Sensyo, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Ye shes’phrin las (1983) Mon yul gzhi rtsa’i gnas tshul. In: Bod kyi rig gnas lo rgyus dpyad gzhi’i rgyu cha bdams bsgrigs/’don thengs gnyis pa. Bod rang skyong ljongs chab srid gros tshogs rig gnas lo rgyus rgyu cha u yon lhan khang, Lhasa: 132–163Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuharu Mizuno
    • 1
  • Lobsang Tenpa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography Graduate School of LettersKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Institute for South and Central Asian StudiesUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations