Skip to main content

Households’ Behavior in Selling Rice and Wheat Seed in the Market

  • Chapter
Community Seed Production Sustainability in Rice-Wheat Farming

Abstract

In community seed production, farmers produce seed at the household level but sell it to markets through their organizations. To maximize benefit at marketing, farmers tend to sell the maximum proportion of the seed produced in a household, but this does not hold true in subsistence farming. This chapter analyzes the impacts of socioeconomic variables in household seed-selling behavior in rice and wheat. A field survey was carried out in three Tarai districts of Nepal including 180 households, and data analysis was done using the Heckman selection model as it captures selection bias. Results showed that 65 % of the surveyed households sell rice seed in the market and the sold seed comprises 64.4 % of the total rice seed produced by a household. Similarly, for wheat 44.4 % of households participate in the market and sell 92.5 % of the produced seed. This chapter also identifies the significant roles of family labor, irrigation facility, operational land, training, share collection, and seed price in household behavior in selling rice and wheat seed in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    LFU is a measure for labor force, where people from 15–59 years old regardless of their sex were categorized as 1 person = 1 LFU, but in case of children (10–14 years old) and elderly people (>59 years old) 1 person = 0.5 LFU

  2. 2.

    LSU is the aggregate of different types of livestock kept at household in standard units calculated using the following equivalents; 1 adult buffalo = 1 LSU, 1 immature buffalo = 0.5 LSU, 1 cow = 0.8 LSU, 1 calf = 0.4 LSU, 1 pig = 0.3 LSU, 1 sheep or goat = 0.2 LSU and 1 poultry or pigeon =0.1 LSU (Khanal and Maharjan 2014)

References

  • Acharya BM (2009) Is cooperative really a democratic organization? Lessons learnt from the selected cooperative acts of the world. Annual bulletin. Cooperative Development Board, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders C, Louwaars N (1999) Farmers’ seed production: new approaches and practices. Available via www.acss.ws/Upload/XML/Research/99.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2011

  • Almekinders C, Louwaars NP, Bruijin GH (1994) Local seed system and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica 78:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azam MS, Ima KS, Gaiha R (2012) Agricultural supply response and small holder market participation. The case of Cambodia. Available via http://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2012-09.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2013

  • Benefica R, Tschirley D, Boughton D (2006) Interlinked transaction in cash cropping economies: the determinant of farmers’ participation and performance in the Zambezi River Vally of Mozambique. Contributed paper presented at the 26th international association of agricultural economists conference, Gold Coast, Australia, August 12–18, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishaw Z, van Gastel AJG (2008) ICARDA’s seed delivery approach in less favorable areas through village-based seed enterprises: conceptual and organizational issues. J New Seeds 9(1):68–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David S (2004) Farmer seed enterprises: a sustainable approach to seed delivery? J Agric Hum Values 21:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Promoting the growth and development of small seed enterprises for food security crops. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1839e/i1839e00.pdf

  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. J Econ 47(1):53–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Janvry A, Fafchamps M, Sadoulet E (1991) Peasant household behavior with missing market: some paradoxes explained. Econ J 101(409):1400–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanal NP, Maharjan K (2014) Adoption of improved rice varieties in the Tarai region of Nepal. In: Maharjan KL (ed) Communities and livelihood strategies in developing countries. Springer, Tokyo, pp 49–64. doi:10.1007/798-4-431-54774-7-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kugbei S (2007) Seed economics: commercial consideration for enterprise management in developing countries. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal KK, Thapa M, Guenat D (2009) Review of seed projects in Nepal. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanteri S, Quagliotti L (1997) Problems related to seed production in African region. Euphytica 96:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris ML, Rusike J, Smale M (1998) Maize seed industries: a conceptual framework. In: Morris ML (ed) Maize seed industries in developing countries. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawata K (2004) Estimation of the female labor supply model by Heckman’s two-step estimator and maximum likelihood estimator. Math Comput Simul 64:385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawata K, Nagase N (1996) Estimation of sample selection method. Economet Rev 15:387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omiti JM, Otieno DJ, Nyanamba TO, Mccullough E (2009) Factors influencing the intensity of market participation by smallholder farmers: a case study of rural and peri-urban areas of Kenya. Available via http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/56958/2/0301Omiti%20-%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2012

  • Pindyck RS, Rubinfield D (1981) Econometric models and economic forecasts. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Setimela PS, Monyo E, Banziger M (eds) (2004) Successful community-based seed production strategies. CIMMYT, Mexico City

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas T, Bishaw Z, Rizvi J, Niane AA, Manan AR, Amegbeto K (2010) ICARDA’s approach in seed delivery: technical performance and sustainability of village-based seed enterprises in Afghanistan. J New Seeds 11(2):138–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins S, Cromwell E (1995) NGOs and seed provision to smallholders in developing countries. World Dev 23:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR, Devkota KP, Joshi KD (2010) Linking community-based seed producers to markets for a sustainable seed supply system. J Exp Agric 46(4):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khanal, N.P., Maharjan, K.L. (2015). Households’ Behavior in Selling Rice and Wheat Seed in the Market. In: Community Seed Production Sustainability in Rice-Wheat Farming. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55474-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics