Skip to main content

AdS/CFT—Non-equilibrium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
AdS/CFT Duality User Guide

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 903))

  • 3254 Accesses

Abstract

The GKP-Witten relation is the most important equation to apply AdS/CFT to nonequilibrium physics. We explain the relation using simple examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The GKP-Witten relation is actually formulated as the Euclidean relation. Here, we are interested in dynamics, so we use the Lorentzian GKP-Witten relation. There exist several important differences between the Euclidean relation and the Lorentzian relation. For example, there is a difference in the boundary condition at the black hole horizon (Sect. 10.2). Also, one should not take the Lorentzian relation too literally (Sect. 10.4).

  2. 2.

    The bulk field \(\phi \) in the GKP-Witten relation is not just a scalar field like Eq. (10.8) but represents bulk fields in the five-dimensional gravitational theory collectively. Incidentally, if \(\phi \) is not constant as \(u\rightarrow 0\) but behaves as \(\phi \sim u^{\varDelta _-}\), one defines \(\phi ^{(0)}\) as \(\phi |_{u=0} = \phi ^{(0)}u^{\varDelta _-}\) (see the massive scalar field example below).

  3. 3.

    \({}^\blacklozenge \)In addition to the bulk action Eq. (10.7), one generally needs to take into account appropriate boundary actions such as the Gibbons-Hawking action and the counterterm actions (both for gravity and for matter fields) as we saw in Chap. 7 Appendix.

  4. 4.

    We choose the dimensions of matter fields as \([A_M] = \text {L}^{-1} = \text {M}\) and \([\phi ] = \text {L}^0 = \text {M}^0\) so that the dimensions here coincide with the scaling dimensions which appear later.

  5. 5.

    It is enough to consider the scalar action only for the discussion below because the Einstein-Hilbert action is independent of the scalar field.

  6. 6.

    \({}^\blacklozenge \)More precisely, the fast falloff means a normalizable mode. A normalizable mode can be quantized, whereas a non-normalizable mode cannot be quantized and should be regarded as an external source. Then, there are cases where even the slow falloff is a normalizable mode. This indeed happens, and one can exchange the role of the external source and the operator in such a case (see App.). One should take this into account for the field/operator correspondence to really work.

  7. 7.

    \({}^\blacklozenge \)“The fast falloff as the response” is a useful phrase to remember, but it is not always true. In some cases, additional terms in the action may modify the relation. In such a case, one should go back to the GKP-Witten relation (see, e.g., “\(d = 5\) R-charged Black Hole and Holographic Current Anomaly” in Chap. 11 App. and Chap. 12 App. 1).

  8. 8.

    In many examples below, \(\langle O\rangle = 0\), so \(\delta \langle O\rangle = \langle O\rangle _{s}- \langle O\rangle = \langle O\rangle _{s}\).

  9. 9.

    \({}^\blacklozenge \)This problem is actually trivial in the sense that \(\phi ^{(1)}=0\) for the static homogeneous perturbation from the conformal invariance. One can show this by computing \(\phi ^{(1)}\) in the SAdS black hole background with the regularity condition at the horizon.

  10. 10.

    \({}^\blacklozenge \)This boundary condition is a difference from the Euclidean formalism. In the Euclidean formalism, there is no region inside the “horizon,” so one does not impose the incoming-wave boundary condition.

  11. 11.

    For example, this can be checked by substituting the \(O(\omega )\) solution (12.47) of \(f_k\) into Eq. (10.66).

References

  1. S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov, A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory. Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9802109

  2. E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9802150

  3. P. Breitenlohner, D.Z. Freedman, Positive energy in anti-de Sitter backgrounds and gauged extended supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 115, 197 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. D.T. Son, A.O. Starinets, Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: recipe and applications. JHEP 0209, 042 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0205051

  5. C.P. Herzog, D.T. Son, Schwinger-Keldysh propagators from AdS/CFT correspondence. JHEP 0303, 046 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0212072

  6. K. Skenderis, B.C. van Rees, Real-time gauge/gravity duality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 081601 (2008). arXiv:0805.0150 [hep-th]

  7. I.R. Klebanov, E. Witten, AdS/CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking. Nucl. Phys. B 556, 89 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9905104

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Natsuume .

Appendix: More About Massive Scalars \({}^\blacklozenge \)

Appendix: More About Massive Scalars \({}^\blacklozenge \)

Holographic renormalization   A holographic renormalization is necessary to derive the field/operator correspondence for a massive scalar field. As an example, we consider the case \(p=2\) and \(m^2=-2\), or \((\varDelta _-, \varDelta _+)=(1,2)\).

The counterterm action is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \mathsf {S}_\text {CT} = - \frac{\varDelta _-}{2} \int d^{p+1}x\, \sqrt{-\gamma }\, \phi ^2. \end{aligned}$$
(10.70)

The on-shell action becomes

$$\begin{aligned} \underline{\mathsf {S}}= \underline{\mathsf {S}_\text {bulk}} + \underline{\mathsf {S}_\text {CT}} = \left. \int d^3x\, \left( \frac{1}{2u^2}\phi \phi ' - \frac{1}{2u^3}\phi ^2\right) \right| _{u=0}. \end{aligned}$$
(10.71)

The first term is the bulk contribution. Substituting the asymptotic form of the scalar

$$\begin{aligned} \phi \sim \phi ^{(0)}\left( u + \phi ^{(1)}u^2 \right) , \quad (u\rightarrow 0), \end{aligned}$$
(10.72)

one gets a finite result:

$$\begin{aligned} \underline{\mathsf {S}}= \int d^3x\, \frac{1}{2} \phi ^{(0)\,2}\phi ^{(1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(10.73)

Then, the one-point function is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \langle O\rangle _{s}= \frac{\delta \underline{\mathsf {S}}\big [\phi ^{(0)}\big ]}{\delta \phi ^{(0)}} = \phi ^{(1)}\phi ^{(0)}. \end{aligned}$$
(10.74)

The general formula is

$$\begin{aligned} \langle O\rangle _{s}&= (\varDelta _+ - \varDelta _-) \phi ^{(1)}\phi ^{(0)}\end{aligned}$$
(10.75)
$$\begin{aligned}&= \{ 2\varDelta _+ - (p+1) \} \phi ^{(1)}\phi ^{(0)}. \end{aligned}$$
(10.76)

When \(p=3\) and \(m=0\), one reproduces Eq. (10.20), \(\langle O\rangle _{s}= 4\phi ^{(1)}\phi ^{(0)}\).

Alternative quantization”   From the scaling dimension (10.42), the above procedure gives an operator with dimension \(\varDelta _+ \ge (p+1)/2\). However, it is known that unitarity allows a local scalar operator with dimension \(\varDelta \ge (p-1)/2\). The missing operators \((p-1)/2 \le \varDelta < (p+1)/2\) are provided by the slow falloff. When

$$\begin{aligned} -\frac{(p+1)^2}{4} \le m^2 \le - \frac{(p+1)^2}{4}+1, \end{aligned}$$
(10.77)

the slow falloff is also normalizable so that one can exchange the role of the external source and the operator [7]. The procedure we described so far is known as the “standard quantization” whereas this procedure is known as the “alternative quantization” (Fig. 10.2).

Fig. 10.2
figure 2

Scaling dimension \(\varDelta \) and \(m^2\) from Eq. (10.42). On the thick curve, the falloffs can be interpreted as operators

For the alternative quantization, the counterterm action is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \mathsf {S}_\text {CT} = \int d^{p+1}x\, \sqrt{-\gamma }\, \left( \phi n^M \nabla _M \phi + \frac{\varDelta _-}{2} \phi ^2 \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(10.78)

where \(n^M\) is the unit normal to the boundary, so \(g_{\textit{MN}} n^{M}n^{N}=1\) and \(n^u = -1/\sqrt{g_{uu}}\).

Substituting the asymptotic form of the scalar

$$\begin{aligned} \phi \sim \phi ^{(1)}\left( \phi ^{(0)}u + u^2 \right) , \quad (u\rightarrow 0), \end{aligned}$$
(10.79)

the on-shell action becomes

$$\begin{aligned} \underline{\mathsf {S}}= \underline{\mathsf {S}_\text {bulk}} + \underline{\mathsf {S}_\text {CT}}&= \left. \int d^3x\, \left( \frac{1}{2u^2} \phi \phi '- \frac{1}{u^2} \phi \phi ' +\frac{1}{2u^3} \phi ^2 \right) \right| _{u=0} \end{aligned}$$
(10.80)
$$\begin{aligned}&= -\int d^3x\, \frac{1}{2} \phi ^{(1)\,2}\phi ^{(0)}. \end{aligned}$$
(10.81)

The one-point function is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \langle O\rangle _{s}&= \frac{\delta \underline{\mathsf {S}}[\phi ^{(1)}]}{\delta \phi ^{(1)}} \end{aligned}$$
(10.82)
$$\begin{aligned}&= - \phi ^{(0)}\phi ^{(1)}= -(\varDelta _+ - \varDelta _-) \phi ^{(0)}\phi ^{(1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(10.83)

The result is just the exchange of the external source and the operator (\(\phi ^{(0)}\leftrightarrow \phi ^{(1)}\) and \(\varDelta _+\leftrightarrow \varDelta _-\)).

It is often important to generalize the boundary conditions at the AdS boundary, and this provides one example.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Natsuume, M. (2015). AdS/CFT—Non-equilibrium. In: AdS/CFT Duality User Guide. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 903. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics