Abstract
The GKP-Witten relation is the most important equation to apply AdS/CFT to nonequilibrium physics. We explain the relation using simple examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The GKP-Witten relation is actually formulated as the Euclidean relation. Here, we are interested in dynamics, so we use the Lorentzian GKP-Witten relation. There exist several important differences between the Euclidean relation and the Lorentzian relation. For example, there is a difference in the boundary condition at the black hole horizon (Sect. 10.2). Also, one should not take the Lorentzian relation too literally (Sect. 10.4).
- 2.
The bulk field \(\phi \) in the GKP-Witten relation is not just a scalar field like Eq. (10.8) but represents bulk fields in the five-dimensional gravitational theory collectively. Incidentally, if \(\phi \) is not constant as \(u\rightarrow 0\) but behaves as \(\phi \sim u^{\varDelta _-}\), one defines \(\phi ^{(0)}\) as \(\phi |_{u=0} = \phi ^{(0)}u^{\varDelta _-}\) (see the massive scalar field example below).
- 3.
\({}^\blacklozenge \)In addition to the bulk action Eq. (10.7), one generally needs to take into account appropriate boundary actions such as the Gibbons-Hawking action and the counterterm actions (both for gravity and for matter fields) as we saw in Chap. 7 Appendix.
- 4.
We choose the dimensions of matter fields as \([A_M] = \text {L}^{-1} = \text {M}\) and \([\phi ] = \text {L}^0 = \text {M}^0\) so that the dimensions here coincide with the scaling dimensions which appear later.
- 5.
It is enough to consider the scalar action only for the discussion below because the Einstein-Hilbert action is independent of the scalar field.
- 6.
\({}^\blacklozenge \)More precisely, the fast falloff means a normalizable mode. A normalizable mode can be quantized, whereas a non-normalizable mode cannot be quantized and should be regarded as an external source. Then, there are cases where even the slow falloff is a normalizable mode. This indeed happens, and one can exchange the role of the external source and the operator in such a case (see App.). One should take this into account for the field/operator correspondence to really work.
- 7.
\({}^\blacklozenge \)“The fast falloff as the response” is a useful phrase to remember, but it is not always true. In some cases, additional terms in the action may modify the relation. In such a case, one should go back to the GKP-Witten relation (see, e.g., “\(d = 5\) R-charged Black Hole and Holographic Current Anomaly” in Chap. 11 App. and Chap. 12 App. 1).
- 8.
In many examples below, \(\langle O\rangle = 0\), so \(\delta \langle O\rangle = \langle O\rangle _{s}- \langle O\rangle = \langle O\rangle _{s}\).
- 9.
\({}^\blacklozenge \)This problem is actually trivial in the sense that \(\phi ^{(1)}=0\) for the static homogeneous perturbation from the conformal invariance. One can show this by computing \(\phi ^{(1)}\) in the SAdS black hole background with the regularity condition at the horizon.
- 10.
\({}^\blacklozenge \)This boundary condition is a difference from the Euclidean formalism. In the Euclidean formalism, there is no region inside the “horizon,” so one does not impose the incoming-wave boundary condition.
- 11.
References
S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov, A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory. Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9802109
E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9802150
P. Breitenlohner, D.Z. Freedman, Positive energy in anti-de Sitter backgrounds and gauged extended supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 115, 197 (1982)
D.T. Son, A.O. Starinets, Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: recipe and applications. JHEP 0209, 042 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0205051
C.P. Herzog, D.T. Son, Schwinger-Keldysh propagators from AdS/CFT correspondence. JHEP 0303, 046 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0212072
K. Skenderis, B.C. van Rees, Real-time gauge/gravity duality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 081601 (2008). arXiv:0805.0150 [hep-th]
I.R. Klebanov, E. Witten, AdS/CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking. Nucl. Phys. B 556, 89 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9905104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: More About Massive Scalars \({}^\blacklozenge \)
Appendix: More About Massive Scalars \({}^\blacklozenge \)
Holographic renormalization A holographic renormalization is necessary to derive the field/operator correspondence for a massive scalar field. As an example, we consider the case \(p=2\) and \(m^2=-2\), or \((\varDelta _-, \varDelta _+)=(1,2)\).
The counterterm action is given by
The on-shell action becomes
The first term is the bulk contribution. Substituting the asymptotic form of the scalar
one gets a finite result:
Then, the one-point function is given by
The general formula is
When \(p=3\) and \(m=0\), one reproduces Eq. (10.20), \(\langle O\rangle _{s}= 4\phi ^{(1)}\phi ^{(0)}\).
“Alternative quantization” From the scaling dimension (10.42), the above procedure gives an operator with dimension \(\varDelta _+ \ge (p+1)/2\). However, it is known that unitarity allows a local scalar operator with dimension \(\varDelta \ge (p-1)/2\). The missing operators \((p-1)/2 \le \varDelta < (p+1)/2\) are provided by the slow falloff. When
the slow falloff is also normalizable so that one can exchange the role of the external source and the operator [7]. The procedure we described so far is known as the “standard quantization” whereas this procedure is known as the “alternative quantization” (Fig. 10.2).
For the alternative quantization, the counterterm action is given by
where \(n^M\) is the unit normal to the boundary, so \(g_{\textit{MN}} n^{M}n^{N}=1\) and \(n^u = -1/\sqrt{g_{uu}}\).
Substituting the asymptotic form of the scalar
the on-shell action becomes
The one-point function is given by
The result is just the exchange of the external source and the operator (\(\phi ^{(0)}\leftrightarrow \phi ^{(1)}\) and \(\varDelta _+\leftrightarrow \varDelta _-\)).
It is often important to generalize the boundary conditions at the AdS boundary, and this provides one example.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Natsuume, M. (2015). AdS/CFT—Non-equilibrium. In: AdS/CFT Duality User Guide. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 903. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55440-0
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55441-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)