The Proliferation of Marine Protected Areas Under International Law, European Union Law and Japanese Law

  • Chie SatoEmail author
Part of the Environmental Protection in the European Union book series (ENVPROTEC, volume 5)


In this chapter, I describe existing international and regional rules on marine protected areas (MPAs), which are established to protect marine living resources and the marine ecosystem, including habitat, fauna and flora. First, I explain the international legal framework, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and relevant regulations adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO); second, I explain European Union (EU) law, which prescribes MPAs; third, I briefly mention the legal framework for protecting the marine environment in Japan and fourth, I attempt to clarify the limitations of the existing legal framework from an implementation perspective and briefly mention the actions that could be taken for effective protection of the marine environment.


European Union Marine Protected Area International Maritime Organization European Union Member State National Jurisdiction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Birnie P (2014) Implementation of IMO regulations and oceans policy post-UNCLOS and post-UNCED. In: Govaere I, Lannon E, van Elsuwege P, Adam S (eds) European Union in the world: essays in honour of Marc Maresceau. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  2. Druel E, Gjerde KM (2014) Sustaining marine life beyond boundaries: options for an implementing agreement for marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Mar Policy 49:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frank V (2007) The European community and marine environmental protection in the international law of the sea. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Klabbers J (2011) The validity of EU norms conflicting with international obligations. In: Cannizzaro E, Palchetti P, Wessel RA (eds) International law as law of the European Union. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  5. Matz-Lück N, Fuchs J (2014) The impact of OSPAR on protected area management beyond national jurisdiction: effective regional cooperation or a network of paper parks? Mar Policy 49:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nordquist M, Rosenne S, Yankow A (1990) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 a commentary, vol IV. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Ribeiro MC (2010) The ‘Rainbow’: the first national marine protected area proposed under the high seas. Int J Mar Coast Law 25:183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sakurai Y (2011) Conservation of biodiversity and sustainable fisheries in the coastal marine ecosystems of the shiretoko world natural heritage site. Bull Coast Oceanogr 48(2):139–147, in JapansesGoogle Scholar
  9. Seino S (2011) Marine protected areas as solitary island regional promotion- framework for solution biodiversity conservation and trans-boundary pollution. Doboku Gakkai Ronshuu B3 67(2):784–789, in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  10. Spadi F (2000) Navigation in marine protected areas: national and international law. Ocean Dev Int Law 31:285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van Leeuwen J, van Hoof L, van Tatenhove J (2012) Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union marine strategy framework directive. Mar Policy 36:636–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawMeiji UniversityChiyodakuJapan

Personalised recommendations