Advertisement

Challenges and Prospects for the Nuclear Safety Regime in Japan and in the European Union After Fukushima

  • Kyoji Kawasaki
  • Ryoko Kusumi
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Protection in the European Union book series (ENVPROTEC, volume 5)

Abstract

Nuclear safety falls under the scope of national sovereignty. In the historical course of nuclear technology department, several accidents and incidents have occurred and thus more efforts have been made to achieve a higher level of nuclear safety. Together with the IAEA Safety Standard and the relevant international conventions, such as the Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, the Convention on Assistance in the Cased of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, and the Convention on Nuclear Safety, a nuclear safety regime has been developed and elaborated at not only the national level, but the regional and international levels as well. On 11 March 2011, the Great East Japan Earthquake of magnitude 9.0 and the subsequent tsunami was catastrophic to the region and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. This chapter describes the challenges, developments and prospects for the nuclear safety regimes in Japan and in the European Union after the Fukushima event.

Keywords

Nuclear Power Plant International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Accident Nuclear Safety Nuclear Installation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Álvarez-Verdugo M (2015) The EU ‘Stress Tests’: the basis for a new regulatory framework for nuclear safety. Eur Law J 21(2):161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Johnson PL (2013) The post-Fukushima Daiichi response: the role of the convention on nuclear safety in strengthening the legal framework for nuclear safety. OECD/NEA Nucl Law Bull 91:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kueny L (2014) La gouvernance de la sûreté nucléaire après l’accident nucléaire de Fukushima, Après-Fukushima, regards juridiques franco-japonais. Presess Universitaires d’Aix-MarseilleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nakanishi Y (2014) Chapter 5, nuclear safety rules in EU/EURATOM-changes of EU nuclear energy policy and amendment of the directive after Fukushima accident-. Domestic implimentation of international agreements on nuclear safety : report of the team examining domestic implementation methods of international energy agreements 2010–2012). Japan Energy Law Institute, Aug 2014 (In Janapese). http://www.jeli.gr.jp/report/jeli-R-131@2014_08_Convention%20on%20Nuclear%20Safety%20and%20Executing.pdf
  5. Raetzke C (2013) The European reaction to the Fukushima incident: international conference “Nuclear Safety after Fukushima: From European and Japanese Perspectives” Tokyo, 22 Dec 2011, EUSI Working Paper Series L-2013-01, p 1–12Google Scholar
  6. Reyners P (2013) A new world governance for nuclear safety after Fukushima. Int J Nucl Law 4(1):63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sakai H (2014) Chapter 3, nuclear safety and peer review system. Domestic implimentation of international agreements on nuclear safety : report of the team examining domestic implementation methods of international energy agreements 2010–2012), Japan Energy Law Institute, Aug 2014 (In Janapese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of LawHitotsubashi UniveristyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations