Environmental Damage Remediation in Japan: A Comparative Assessment
This article presents the birth and evolution of the legal framework governing the compensation for environmental damage in Japan along with a comparative assessment.
Legal systems cope with environmental pollution in many ways, and notions of environmental damage differ across the globe. This has an obvious effect on how and to what extent environmental damage is compensated. Before 2004, some EU member states adopted a notion of environmental damage based on the idea of the environment as a common good and public authority as responsible for its remediation. This notion was formally adopted by the EU environmental liability Directive 2004/35/EC.
The central part of the analysis shows how environmental damage is perceived in Japan. While Japan and its population have faced cases of environmental pollution similar to those of the West, the responses of its legal system have been quite different. Japan has adopted the notion of kogai as the cornerstone of its environmental legislation, where damage to the environment itself is not distinct from the damage suffered by the victims of environmental pollution.
The final section of this chapter presents an interpretation of the Japanese legal response to environmental damage and its significance for the debate about the Japanese attitude towards litigation and the so-called ‘Japanese legal consciousness’.
KeywordsEnvironmental Pollution Legal System Environmental Damage Civil Code Strict Liability
- Association Henri Capitant des amis de la culture juridique française, La protection du voisinage et de l’environnement. Dalloz, Paris, 1979Google Scholar
- Bergkamp L, Goldsmith B (2013) The EU environmental liability directive: a commentary. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Brooks KB (2009) Before earth day: the origins of american environmental law, 1945–1970. University Press of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
- Cassotta S (2012) Environmental damage and liability problems in a multilevel context. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
- Colombo GF (2011) Oltre il paradigma della società senza liti: La risoluzione extra-giudiziale delle controversie in Giappone. Cedam, MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Curran GF (1994) Pacific Rim environmental regulation: a western perspective of several countries’ environmental liability laws. J Int Law Pract 3:47Google Scholar
- Gambaro A (ed) (1976) La tutela degli interessi diffusi nel diritto comparato—Con particolare riguardo alla protezione dell’ambiente e dei consumatori. Giuffré, MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Gresser J, Fujikura K, Morishima A (1981) Environmental law in Japan, Studies in East Asian law. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kawashima S (1995) A survey of environmental law and policy in Japan. N C J Int Law Commer Regul 20: 231Google Scholar
- Minami H, Okubo N (2009) Yosetsu kankyo ho, 4 Han (Outline of environmental law), 4th edn. Yuhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Morishima A (1981) Japanese environmental policy and law. In: Kato I, Kumamoto N, Matthews WH (eds) Environmental law and policy in the pacific basin area. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, p 77Google Scholar
- Nakata H. (2005) Minpoten no gendaigoka. In Juristo 1283. p 86Google Scholar
- Nomura Y (1976) The creation and development of Japan’s anti-pollution laws. In: Nowak J (ed) Environmental law: international and comparative aspects. The British Institute of International and Comparative Law, London, p 170Google Scholar
- Osaka E (2009) Reevaluating the role of the tort liability system in Japan. Ariz J Int Comp Law 26:393Google Scholar
- Otsuka T (2002) Kankyo songai ni tai suru sekinin. In: Otsuka T, Kitamura Y (ed) Kankyo hogaku no chosen. Nihon Hyoronsha, Tokyo, 77 and ffGoogle Scholar
- Otsuka T (2009) Kankyo songai ni tai suru sekinin. in Juristo 1372, 42 and ffGoogle Scholar
- Otsuka T (2010) Kankyoho Dai-3-han (Environmental law), 3rd edn. Yuhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Pardieck A (2013) Layers of the law: a look at the role of law in Japan today. Pac Rim Law Policy J 22(3):599Google Scholar
- Pozzo B (1996) Danno ambientale e imputazione della responsabilità—Esperienze giuridiche a confronto. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Ridgley S (1996) Environmental protection agreements Japan in the United States. Pac Rim Law Policy J 5(3):639Google Scholar
- Sand PH (2007) The evolution of international environmental law. In: Bodansky, Brunnée, Hey (eds) The oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 29Google Scholar
- Upham F (1998) Weak legal consciousness as invented tradition. In: Vlastos S (ed) Mirror of modernity: invented traditions of modern Japan. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 48Google Scholar
- Zenkoku kogai bengodan renrakukaigi [National liaison committee of kogai defence attorneys] (1982) Kogai to kuni no sekinin [Kogai and State Liability]. Nihon Hyoronsha, TokyoGoogle Scholar