Abstract
Sustainability transitions pose novel challenges to cities that go beyond traditional planning and urban development policies. Such transitions require broader engagement, empowerment, and breakthrough strategies which enable, facilitate, and direct social innovation processes towards adaptive and innovative urban futures. The transition approach offers a set of principles, a framework, instruments, and process methodologies to analyse as well as systematically organise and facilitate such social learning and innovation processes. During the past decade, researchers and policy entrepreneurs around the world have been experimentally applying the transition perspective in practice under the label of ‘transition management'. This approach is based on bringing together frontrunners from policy, science, business, and society to develop a shared understanding of the joint complex transition challenge, to develop collective transition visions and strategies, and to start strategic experiments. In this chapter we zoom in on the different elements of transition management (i.e., principles, framework, instruments, process methodologies) and their heuristic and operational use in the urban context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Avelino F (2009) Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Sci 42(4):369–390
Avelino F, Loorbach D, Wittmayer J (2011) Het Stimuleren van Duurzaamheid in de Stad. Een Onderzoeksadvies aan de Gemeente Den Haag [commissioned by Gemeente Den Haag]. DRIFT, Rotterdam
Avelino F, Bressers N, Kemp R (2012) Transition management as new policy making for sustainable mobility. In: Geerlings H, Shiftan Y, Stead D (eds) Transition towards sustainable mobility: the role of instruments, individuals and institutions, pp 33–52. Ashgate, Hampshire
Boschma RA (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74
Brockmeier J (2009) Reaching for meaning: human agency and the narrative imagination. Theor Psychol 19(2):213–233
Brown RR, Farelly MA, Loorbach D (2013) Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: the case of Melbourne’s stormwater management. Glob Environ Change 23(4):701–718
Coenen L, Truffer B (2012) Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field. Eur Plan Stud 20(3):367–374
Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B (2012) Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Res Policy 41:968–979
Ferguson B, Frantzeskaki N, Brown R (2013) A strategic program for transitioning to a water sensitive city. Landsc Urban Plan 117:32–45
Frantzeskaki N, Tefrati N (2016) A transformative vision unlocks the innovative potential of Aberdeen City, UK. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 53–72. Springer, Tokyo
Frantzeskaki N, Ferguson BC, Skinner R, Brown RR (2012a) Guidance manual: key steps for implementing a strategic planning process for transformative change. Dutch Research Institute for Transitions, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Monash Water for Liveability, Monash University, Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-921912-14-6
Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D, Meadowcroft J (2012b) Governing transitions to sustainability: transition management as a governance approach towards pursuing sustainability. Int J Sustain Dev 15(1/2):19–36
Frantzeskaki N, Wittmayer J, Loorbach D (2014a) The role of partnerships in ‘realizing’ urban sustainability in Rotterdam’s City Ports Area, the Netherlands. J Clean Prod 65:406–417
Frantzeskaki N, Bach M, Hölscher K, Wittmayer JM, Loorbach D (2014b) Ten years of transition management: taking stock and looking forward. Presented at the 5th international conference on sustainability transitions: impacts and institutions, Utrecht, 27–29 Aug 2014
Grin J (2012) The politics of transition governance in Dutch agriculture. Conceptual understanding and implications for transition management. Int J Sustain Dev 15(1/2):72–89
Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J, i.c.w. Geels F, Loorbach D (2010) Transitions to sustainable development – part 1. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, New York
Hendriks C (2009) Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of TM. Policy Sci 42(4):341–368
Hölscher K, Roorda C, Nevens F (2016) Ghent – fostering a climate for transition. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 95–115. Springer, Tokyo
ICLEI (2012) Local sustainability 2012: taking stock and moving forward, Global review, ICLEI global report. ICLEI, Freiburg
Jhagroe S, Loorbach D (2014) See no evil, hear no evil: the democratic potential of transition management. Environ Innov Soc Transit 15:65–83
Jhagroe S, van Steenbergen F (2014) Van koploper naar koplopen: een pleidooi voor inclusief leiderschap. Drift essay 2014.04. Online at: http://www.drift.eur.nl/?p=262. Jan 2015
Kemp R, Rotmans J (2009) Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci 42:303–322
Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Tech Anal Strat Manag 10(2):175–196
Kern F (2012) The discursive politics of governing transitions towards sustainability: the UK Carbon Trust. Int J Sustain Dev 15(1/2):90–105
Kern F, Howlett M (2009) Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sci 42(4):391–408
Krauz A (2016) Transition management in Montreuil: towards perspectives of hybridization between ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ transitions. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 137–154. Springer, Tokyo
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas C (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science – practice, principles and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(suppl 1):25–43
Leach M, Scoones I, and Stirling A (2010) Dynamic Sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. Earthscan, Oxon
Loorbach D (2007) Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. PhD thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1):161–183
Loorbach D (2014) To transition! Governance panarchy in the new transformation. DRIFT/EUR, Rotterdam
Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2012) Transities en transitiemanagement. Oorsprong, status en toekomst. E2012.01. DRIFT, Rotterdam
Loorbach D, Shiroyama H (2016) The challenge of sustainable urban development and transforming cities. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 3–15. Springer, Tokyo
Meadowcroft J (2009) What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci 42(4):323–340
Mizuguchi S, Ohta K, Beer PJ, Yamaguchi M, Nishimura T (2016) Interactions among multiple niche-innovations and multi-regimes: the case of the “welfare mall” in Higashiomi. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 73–93. Springer, Tokyo
Nevens F, Roorda C (2014) A climate of change: a transition approach for climate neutrality in the city of Ghent (Belgium). Sustain Cities Soc 10:112–121
Nevens F, Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D, Gorissen L (2013) Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. J Clean Prod 50:111–122
Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems’. Ecol Soc 11(1):18
Quist J, Thissen W, Vergragt P (2011) The impact and spin-off of participatory backcasting after 10 years: from vision to niche. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(5):883–897
Quist J, Wittmayer JM, van Steenbergen F, Loorbach D (2013) Combining backcasting and transition management in the community arena. In: Quist J, Wittmayer J, Umpfenbach K, Bauler T (eds) Pathways, transitions and backcasting for low-carbon and sustainable lifestyles. Sustainable consumption transitions series, issue 3. Proceedings of SCORAI Europe & InContext workshop, 7–8 Oct 2013, Rotterdam. Online available at: http://www.incontext-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/Proceedings%20InContext%20SCORAI%20Quist%20etal%20p33-54.pdf
Raven R, Schot J, Berkhout F (2012) Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environ Innov Soc Transit 4:63–78
Roorda C, Wittmayer J (2014) Transition management in five European cities – an evaluation. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Roorda C, Wittmayer J, Henneman P, van Steenbergen F, Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D (2014) Transition management in the urban context. Guidance manual. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Rotmans J, Loorbach D (2009) Complexity and transition management. J Ind Ecol 13(2):184–196
Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):15–31
Schot J, Geels FW (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Tech Anal Strateg 20(5):537–554
Shiroyama H, Kajiki S (2016) Case study of eco-town project in Kitakyushu: tension among incumbents and the transition from industrial city to green city. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 117–136. Springer, Tokyo
Shove E, Walker G (2007) CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environ Plan A 39:763–770
Smith A, Stirling A (2010) The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecol Soc 15(1):11
Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy 34:1491–1510
Sondeijker S (2009) Imagining sustainability: methodological building blocks for transition scenarios. PhD thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Stirling A (2008) Opening up and closing down: power, participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Hum Values 33(2):262–294
Taanman M (2014) Looking for transitions. Monitoring approach for sustainable transition programmes. PhD thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Taanman M, Wittmayer JM, Diepenmaat H (2012) Monitoring on-going vision development in system change programmes. J Chains Netw Sci 12(2):125–136
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992) Agenda 21. UNCED, New York. Available from: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2014
Van Buuren A, Loorbach D (2009) Policy innovation in isolation. Conditions for policy-renewal by transition arenas and pilot projects. Public Manag Rev 11:375–392
Van den Bosch S (2010) Transition experiments: exploring societal changes towards sustainability. Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Van den Bosch S, Rotmans J (2008) Deepening, broadening and scaling up. A framework for steering transition experiments. KCT essay #02. Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions (KCT), Delft and Rotterdam
Van der Brugge R, Rotmans J, Loorbach D (2005) The transition in Dutch water management. Reg Environ Chang 5:167–176
Verbong G, Loorbach D (eds) (2012) Governing the Energy Transition. Reality, Illusion or Necessity? Routledge, New York
Voß JP (2014) Performative policy studies: realizing “transition management”. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 27(4):317–343
Voß JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (2006) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton
Wiek A (2007) Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation – experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA 16(1):52–57
Wiek A, Talwar S, O’Shea M, Robinson J (2014) Towards a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research. Res Eval 23(2):117–132
Wittmayer J (2014) Creating a sustainability movement in The Hague, The Netherlands. In: Wittmayer J, Roorda C, van Steenbergen F (eds) Governing urban sustainability transitions – inspiring examples. DRIFT, Rotterdam, pp 68–73
Wittmayer J (2016) Insights and lessons for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 157–173. Springer, Tokyo
Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N (2014) Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustain Sci 9(4):483–496. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4
Wittmayer J, van Steenbergen F (2014) Researching roles in transition: a case study. Paper presented at the 9th international conference in interpretive policy analysis. Governance and beyond: knowledge, technology and communication in a globalizing world, Wageningen, 3–5 July, 2013
Wittmayer J, van Steenbergen F, Quist J, Loorbach D, Hoogland C (2011) The community arena: a co-creation tool for sustainable behaviour by local communities. Methodological guidelines. Deliverable 4.1, InContext: EU ENV.2010.4.2.3-1 grant agreement n° 265191. Online available here: http://www.incontext-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/D4-1_Methodological%20guidelines_final.pdf
Wittmayer J, van Steenbergen F, Baasch S, Feiner G, Mock M, Omann I (2013) Pilot projects rounding up. Year 3 pilot-specific report. Deliverable 4.4. InContext: EU ENV.2010.4.2.3-1 grant agreement n° 265191. Online available here: http://www.incontext-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/Pilot%20projects%20rounding%20up%2C%20Year%203%20Pilot-Specific%20Report.pdf
Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N, van Steenbergen F, Omann I (2014a) Making sense of sustainability transitions locally. How action research contributes to addressing societal challenges. Crit Policy Stud 8(4):465–485
Wittmayer J, Roorda C, van Steenbergen F (eds) (2014b) Governing urban sustainability transitions: inspiring examples. DRIFT, Rotterdam
Wittmayer JM, Rok A, Roorda C, van Steenbergen F (2015) Governing sustainability: a dialogue between Local Agenda 21 and transition management. Local Environ. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1050658
Wittmayer J, Mizuguchi S, Rach S, Fujino J (2016) City networks for sustainability transitions in Europe and Japan. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions, pp 37–50. Springer, Tokyo
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wittmayer, J.M., Loorbach, D. (2016). Governing Transitions in Cities: Fostering Alternative Ideas, Practices, and Social Relations Through Transition Management. In: Loorbach, D., Wittmayer, J., Shiroyama, H., Fujino, J., Mizuguchi, S. (eds) Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55425-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55426-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)