Skip to main content

Attractive Interaction and Bound States

  • Chapter
  • 2802 Accesses

Part of the book series: Graduate Texts in Physics ((GTP))

Abstract

Struggling to find a way to theoretically explain the phenomenon of superconductivity, in 1956 Cooper eventually reached a simplified version of the problem of two particles on the Fermi surface under a mutual attraction. Cooper’s problem, which represented a breakthrough in constructing a microscopic theory of superconductivity, is essentially identical to a one-particle problem with an attractive potential in two dimensions. In this chapter, we consider attractive potentials to clarify under what conditions a bound state is formed. First, we consider one-particle problems with an attractive potential in two and three dimensions to show that an infinitesimal attraction suffices in two dimensions to form a bound state whereas a finite threshold is requisite in three dimensions. Next, we shall see that this qualitative difference between two and three dimensions is caused by whether the one-particle density of states is finite at zero energy. Finally, the presence of the Fermi surface in Cooper’s problem will be shown to make the density of states at the excitation threshold finite even in three dimensions, resulting in the formation of a bound state from only an infinitesimal attraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Factor \(V ^{-1/2}\) in (7.15) originates from the normalization condition \(\langle \phi \vert \phi \rangle = 1\), whereas V −1 in (7.16) is so chosen to ensure that the coefficient \(\mathcal{V}_{k}\) is independent of V in the thermodynamic limit.

  2. 2.

    Factor V −1 in (7.29) results from a product of two \(V ^{-1/2}\) for each of r 1 and r 2.

References

  1. M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover, New York, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.B. Arfken, H.J. Weber, Mathematical Methods for Physicists (Academic, New York, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bardeen, D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 99, 1140 (1955)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. L.N. Cooper, Phys. Rev. 104, 1189 (1956)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A.R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Fröhlich, Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) A 215, 291 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory, 3rd edn. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.R. Schafroth, Phys. Rev. 96, 1442 (1954); see also, M.R. Schafroth, S.T. Butler, J.M. Blatt, Helv. Phys. Acta 30, 93 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.R. Schafroth, Phys. Rev. 96, 1149 (1954); 100, 463 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kita, T. (2015). Attractive Interaction and Bound States. In: Statistical Mechanics of Superconductivity. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55405-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics