Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 13)
Emission Tax Timing and a Monopoly Market
In many economically developed countries, “voluntary approaches”, widely recognized as environmental policy instruments, have been introduced during the last few decades.
KeywordsSocial Welfare Effort Level Asymptotic Line Voluntary Approach Monopoly Market
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
- 1.Ben Youssef, S., & Dinar, Z. (2011). Regulation of a duopoly and environmental R&D. Environmental Economics, 2(3), 47–51.Google Scholar
- 6.Conrad, K. (2001). Voluntary environmental agreement vs. emission taxes in strategic trade models. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 361–381.Google Scholar
- 14.OECD (1999). Voluntary approaches for environmental policy: An assessment. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- 15.OECD (2003). Voluntary approaches for environmental policy – Effectiveness, efficiency and usage in policy mixes. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- 18.Petrakis, E., & Xepapadeas, A. (1999). Does government precommitment promote environmental innovation? In E. Petrakis, E. S. Sartzetakis, & A. Xepapadeas (Eds), Environmental regulation and market power: Competition, time consistency and international trade (pp. 145–161). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- 24.Requate, T. (1993). Pollution control under imperfect competition: Asymmetric Bertrand duopoly with linear technologies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149(2), 415–442.Google Scholar
- 29.Scott, J. T. (2003). Environmental research and development: US industrial research, the clean air act and environmental damage. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
© Springer Japan 2016