Fertility, Costs for Children and Public Policy

  • Tatsuya OmoriEmail author
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 13)


Population growth is one of factors to affect the economic growth. Such growth affects not only economic growth but also labour supply. Many developed countries face the population declining. For example, Japan is one of the most declining country where the number of population is estimated about 128 million at 2010 and will be estimated around 99 million at 2046. (National Institute of Population and Social Security Research of Japan (2013).)


Social Security Public Support Economic Growth Rate Fertility Decision Wage Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2004). Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barro, R. J., & Becker, G. S. (1989). Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica, 57, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, G. S., & Barro, R. J. (1988). A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1986). Human capital and the rise and fall of families. Journal of Labor Economics, 4, S1–S39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blackorby, C., & Donaldson, D. (1988). Cash versus in-kind, self-selection, and efficient transfers. American Economic Review, 78, 691–700.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cabinet Office of Japan. (2004). Declining Birthrate White Paper.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cremer, H., Gahvari, F., & Pestieau, P. (2008). Pensions with heterogeneous individuals and endogenous fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 21, 961–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de la Croix, D., & Doepke, M. (2004). Public versus private education when differential fertility matters. Journal of Development Economics, 73, 607–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diamond, P. A. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126–1150.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eckstein, Z., & Wolpin, K. I. (1985). Endogenous fertility and optimal population size. Journal of Public Economics, 27, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ehrlich, I., & Zhong, J. G. (1998). Social security and the real economy: An inquiry into some neglected issues. American Economic Review, 88, 151–157.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gahvari, F. (1994). In-kind transfers, cash grants and labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 55, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gale, W. G., & Scholz, J. K. (1994). Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glomm, G., & Kaganovich, M. (2003). Distribution effects of public education in an economy with public pensions. International Economic Review, 44, 917–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glomm, G., & Kaganovich, M. (2008). Social security, public education and the growth-inequality relationship. European Economic Review, 52, 1009–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public versus private investment in human capital endogenous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 813–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Groezen, B. V., Leers, B., & Meijdam, L. (2003). Social security and endogenous fertility: Pensions and child allowances as Siamese twins. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grossman, G. M., & Yanagawa, N. (1993). Asset bubbles and endogenous growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 31, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirazawa, M., & Yakita, A. (2009). Fertility, child care outside the home, and pay-as-you-go social security. Journal of Population Economics, 22, 565–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaganovich, M., & Zilcha, I. (1999). Education, social security, and growth. Journal of Public Economics, 71, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lapan, H. E., & Enders, W. (1990). Endogenous fertility, Ricardian equivalence, and debt management policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morand, O. F. (1999). Endogenous fertility, income distribution, and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Munro, A. (1989). In-kind transfers, cash grants and the supply of labour. European Economic Review, 33, 1597–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Omori, T. (2002, in Japanese). Public child care and economic growth. The annual of Japan Economic Policy Association, 50, 79–85.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Omori, T. (2009). Effects of public education and social security on fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 22, 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pecchenino, R. A., & Pollard, P. S. (2002). Dependent children and aged parents: Funding education and social security in an aging economy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 24, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pecchenino, R. A., & Utendorf, K. R. (1999). Social security, social welfare and the aging population. Journal of Population Economics, 12, 607–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Razin, A., Sadka, E., & Swagel, P. (2002). The aging population and the size of the welfare state. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 900–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Samuelson, P. (1958). An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tabata, K. (2003). Inverted u-shaped fertility dynamics, the poverty trap and growth. Economics Letters, 81, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yakita, A. (2001). Uncertain lifetime, fertility and social security. Journal of Population Economics, 14, 635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yew, S. L., & Zhang, J. (2009). Optimal social security in a dynastic model with human capital externalities, fertility and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wigger, B. U. (1999). Pay-as-you-go financed public pensions in a model of endogenous growth and fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 12, 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, J. (1995). Does unfunded social security also depress output growth? Economics Letters, 49, 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang, J. (1995). Social security and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economics, 58, 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (1998). Social security, intergenerational transfers, and endogenous growth. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31, 1225–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2003). Long-run effects of unfunded social security with earnings-dependent benefits. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28, 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2004). How does social security affect economic growth? Evidence form cross-country data. Journal of Population Economics, 17, 473–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. (2007). Optimal social security in a dynastic model with investment externalities and endogenous fertility. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3545–3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and Public PoliciesChukyo UniversityNagoya city, AichiJapan

Personalised recommendations