Skip to main content

Value Co-creation Platform as Part of an Integrative Group Model-Building Process in Policy Development in Indonesia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systems Science for Complex Policy Making

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 3))

  • 479 Accesses

Abstract

The Indonesian government nowadays faces multidimensional and multifaceted problems that require a more proper framework of policy making. Group model building (GMB), in parallel with system dynamics, becomes a successful methodology in policy making though some weaknesses exist. We have proposed an integrative GMB process by adapting the framework of value co-creation and orchestration platform to overcome those problems. Three management strategies of value co-creation as the main findings are revoked: involvement, curation, and empowerment. Those keywords are inputted to improve the GMB process and applied to the wicked problems found in the Indonesian context that needs more integrative solution to see how the GMB platform may be implemented in the real-world problem. Although it is still an ongoing process, we can see that by adapting the value co-creation platform as part of the GMB process, it is advantageous in defining what activities should be done by each actor (e.g., facilitator, modeler, stakeholders) in order to have a better policy recommendation in the part of policy making and policy development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Common Wealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie, S. S. (2008). Wicked problems and applied economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(5), 1176–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérard, C. (2010). Group model building using system dynamics: An analysis of methodological frameworks. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(1), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbrun, J., & Kijima, K. (2009). Fostering innovation system of a firm with hierarchy theory: Narratives on emergent clinical solutions in healthcare. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the ISSS, Madison, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijima, K., Rintamki, T., & Mitronen, L. (2013). Value orchestration platform: Model and strategies. In Annual conference of Japan society for management information 2014, Japan (pp. 13–16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Novani, S., Putro, U. S., & Hermawan, P. (2015). Value orchestration platform: promoting tourism in batik industrial cluster solo. In The 6th Indonesia international conference on innovation, entrepreneurship and small business, Bali, Indonesia (pp. 207–216).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. (2012). A bottom-up design approach to reducing crime and corruption. 2012 conference of the international public management network, innovations in public management for combating corruption, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J. (1999). Group model-building: Tackling messy problem. System Dynamics Review, 15(4), 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Utomo Sarjono Putro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Putro, U.S. (2016). Value Co-creation Platform as Part of an Integrative Group Model-Building Process in Policy Development in Indonesia. In: Mangkusubroto, K., Putro, U.S., Novani, S., Kijima, K. (eds) Systems Science for Complex Policy Making. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 3. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55273-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics