Skip to main content

Significance of Nonlinearity and Many Goods Models

Feasibility of the (S, s) Inventory Control Policy in the Economy as a Whole

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Microfoundations of Evolutionary Economics

Abstract

This chapter examines what economic consequences can be induced in the entire economy when many different enterprises in the economy implement production based on inventory control, which is referred to as the (S, s) policy.

The first section describes the features of a contemporary society that is characterized by an enormous number of different kinds of commodities. To theoretically contemplate an economy with these many kinds of commodities, the concepts of vector space and nonlinearity are explained in the Introduction. The second section of this paper explains the (S, s) inventory control policy theory developed by Scarf (The optimality of (S,s) policies in the dynamic inventory problem. In: Arrow KJ, Karlin S, and Suppes P (eds) Mathematical methods in the social sciences 1959. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1959). Since Scarf’s model is a model that focuses on one kind of goods, it does not consider the movements of the entire economy. We discuss this crucial point with respect to Scarf (The optimality of (S,s) policies in the dynamic inventory problem. In: Arrow KJ, Karlin S, and Suppes P (eds) Mathematical methods in the social sciences 1959. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1959) and develop the Scarf model into a many kinds of goods model. The sequence of events and the determinant processes of our model are precisely explained. Next, the third section shows the quantity adjustment processes based on the (S, s) policy model. The mathematical solutions of a one kind of goods and two kinds of goods models are shown, and next, the results, which are different results from the one kind of goods and the two kinds of goods, by the more than three kinds of goods model are discussed. In the fourth section, certain of the results obtained by numerical experiments conducted by the author are explained, and the effects of the number of commodities are discussed.

I would like to express my thanks to the co-authors, Yoshinori Shiozawa and Masashi Morioka, who read this chapter and gave me helpful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The origin of the word “vector” comes from the Latin vehere (carrying). A vector is often indicated by a bold character x or \(\vec {x}\) with an arrow over the character, but this chapter uses the normal character x.

  2. 2.

    See Shiozawa (2016).

  3. 3.

    The relation that z is greater than or equal to s can be expressed as the case z = max{z, s}.

  4. 4.

    Scarf (1959) p.197.

  5. 5.

    Regarding the “process analysis,” see Chap. 1, Sect. 5, “Methodology of Analysis.”

  6. 6.

    See Eq. (6.7).

  7. 7.

    See Table 6.1.

  8. 8.

    Keynes (1936) pp.195–6.

  9. 9.

    Regarding the “loosely connected system,” see Chap. 1, Sect. 4, “Environment of Economic Activities.”

  10. 10.

    Refer to Kornai and Martos (1981) and Morioka (2005).

  11. 11.

    See Chap. 2, Sect. 3, “Some Characteristic Features of the System.”

  12. 12.

    Regarding the multiple enterprises model, see Pasinetti (1977, 1981).

  13. 13.

    Regarding the evolutionary features, see Chap. 1, Sects. 1, 2, and 3.

  14. 14.

    See the Theorems 1 and 2 in Chap. 4 and Morioka (2005).

  15. 15.

    Since A is a 13 × 13 matrix, Φ is a 26 × 26 matrix.

  16. 16.

    See Chaps. 3, 4, and 5.

  17. 17.

    In this chapter, we did not perform experiments regarding the traverses with different growth rates and cases where demand is partitioned due to inventory shortages.

  18. 18.

    Regarding the “micro-macro loop,” see Chap. 1, Sect. 5, “Methodology of Analysis.”

References

  • Arrow, K. J., Harris, T., & Marschak, J. (1951). Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica, 19, 250–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., Karlin, S., & Scarf, H. (Eds.). (1958). Studies in the mathematical theory of inventory and production. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes Vol. 7 (1973). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kita, H., Taniguchi, K., & Nakajima, Y. (Eds.). (2016). Realistic simulation of financial markets – analyzing market behaviors by the third mode of science. Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J., & Martos, B. (Eds.). (1981). Non-price control. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morioka, M. (2005). The economic theory of quantity adjustment (In Japanese). Nihon Keizai Hyouronnsya. (Japanese Title; Suuryou Tyousei no Keizai Riron).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1977). Lectures on the theory of production. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. (1981). Structural change and economic growth. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. (1959). The optimality of (S,s) policies in the dynamic inventory problem. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in the social sciences 1959. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. E. (2002). Inventory theory. Operations Research, 50(1), 186–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiozawa, Y. (1981). Foundations of mathematical economics (In Japanese). Asakura Shoten. (Japanese Title; Suuri Keizaigaku no Kiso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiozawa, Y. (2016). A guide tour of the backside of agent-based simulation, chapter 1. In H. Kita, K. Taniguchi, & Y. Nakajima (Eds.), Realistic simulation of financial markets. Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, K. (1991). On the traverse of quantity adjustment economies (In Japanese). Journal of Economics (The Keizaigaku Zasshi), 91(5), 29–43. The Economic Society of Osaka City University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, K. (1995). On a complex adaptive system in short-run quantitative adjustment economies. In N. Aoki, K. Shiraiwa, & Y. Takahashi (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on dynamical systems and chaos. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, K. (1997). Theories and numerical experiments of traverse (In Japanese). Keibunsha, Kyoto. (Japanese Title; Ikoukatei no Riron to Suuchijikken).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshinori, S. (1983). The micro structure of Kahn and Keynes multiplier process (In Japanese). Journal of Economics (The Keizaigaku Zasshi), 84(3), 48–64. The Economic Society of Osaka City University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shiozawa, Y., Morioka, M., Taniguchi, K. (2019). Significance of Nonlinearity and Many Goods Models. In: Microfoundations of Evolutionary Economics. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 15. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55267-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics