Advertisement

Generalization of Technological Propagation/Diffusion Externalities Based on the General Equilibrium Model of Formation Process of Marshallian External Economies: Number 4

  • Hirotada Kohno
Chapter
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 1)

Abstract

As mentioned in the Sect.  8.1.1 of Chap.  8, we have treated selectively the independently existing indirect economic effects, different from the transferred effects from the direct effects. In Chap.  9, we have coped with the task that the following “two” will coincide with each other (transferred effects ≒ indirect effects) or come to be incidence base effects > transferred effects, and then the independently existing theory can be proved, in the form of contrasting the effects in generation base (this is the direct effects) with the effects in incidence base (which include the pure indirect effects existing independently except the transferred effects). This is, so to speak, that we have tackled on the “existence demonstration” concerning the pure indirect effects which exist independently. This chapter is based on [17], [10, pp. 57–63], [11], [13], [15], etc.

Keywords

Generation Base Labor Input General Equilibrium Model Intermediate Input Subsidy Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Chipman, J.S. 1970. External economies of scale and competitive equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 348–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Funabashi, Takeshi, and Y. Higano. 1994. Measurements of the public investment’s benefits based on the generation base or incidence base and their comparison—Using a general equilibrium model where the Marshallian externality exists. Studies in Regional Science 24(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanemoto, Y., and K. Mera. 1985. General equilibrium analysis of the benefits of large transportation improvement. Regional Science and Urban Economics 15: 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Chap. X: Industrial organization, continued. The concentration of specialized industries in particular localities; Chap. VIII: Conclusion, correlation of the tendency to increasing and diminishing return. In Principles of economics, 8th ed. Book IV, pp. 222–231; pp. 262–268. London: Macmillan. (Translated by Keinosuke Baba, Toyokeizai-Shinposha. 1965–1967.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohring, Herbert, and Mitchell Harwitz. 1962. Highway benefits—An analytical framework. Evanston: The Transportation Center at Northwestern University by Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Samuelson, P.A. 1942. Constancy of the marginal utility of income. In The collected scientific papers of A. Samuelson, vol. 1, ed. J.E. Stiglitz, 37–53.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jan, Tinbergen. 1957. The appraisal of road construction: two calculation schemes. The Review of Economics and Statistics XXXIX(3): 241–249. (Translated by Yukihide Okano. 1958. Expressways 1(2): pp. 37–47 & 50).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kohno, Hirotada. 1976. Formation process of the indirect economic effects. Expressways and Automobiles XIX(4): 21–29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohno, H., and Y. Higano. 1981. Comprehensive valuation. In The Regional Science in Japan: Survey II, Studies in Regional Science, vol. II, 221–330. Tokyo: JRSA.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kohno, Hirotada. 1983. Regional development effects brought about by the public investments. In Studies in Regional Science, The 19th JSRSA annual meeting report of 1982, vol. 13, 57–81. Tokyo: Japan section of RSA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kohno, H. 1987. Social benefits of transport investment—Theoretical synthesis. In Expert meeting and symposium in the appraisal of social and economic effects of road network improvement, OECD Highway Committee, pp. 80–92, Yokohama, May 26–28th.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kohno, H. 1987. Social benefits of transport investment—Theoretical synthesis. In Expert meeting and symposium in the appraisal of social and economic effects of road network improvement (Japanese edition), OECD Highway Committee, pp. 79–90, Yokohama, May 26–28th.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohno, Hirotada, and Higano, Yoshiro. 1993. A proof of the existence of Tinbergen multiplier on the indirect benefits of public investment. A paper prepared for the 40th North American meetings of the RSAI, 1–42. Houston, November 11–14.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kohno, H., and Masaya Ide. 1994. Indirect economic effects of expressway: Introductory remarks. In Various problems in the modern economic society—The second volume—Collected papers celebrating emeritus professor Yasuhiko Oishi’s 70th birthday, ed. Kengo Uno, H. Kohno, et al., 159–171. Tokyo: Toyokeizai.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kohno, H., Morishima, Takaharu, Ide, M. 1994. Quantification of the optimum comprehensive transport system—Installation of the technological progress into the multi-period industrial input-output tables. Research project (1994 < h. 6>) of the Transport Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kohno, H. 2007. Simultaneous equilibrium of industries and enterprises in the long range—In the case where there is the Marshallian external economies. In The principle of economies I•II: Micro economicsmacro economics, pp. 16–121, Socio-Economic Planning Office.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shibusawa, Hiroyuki, Yoshiro Higano, and H. Kohno. 2010. A study on the appraisal method of social benefits—Using a general equilibrium model taken account of the externality of technological propagation•diffusion. Studies in Regional Science 40(1): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hirotada Kohno
    • 1
  1. 1.Professor Emeritus University of TsukubaTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations