Advertisement

Unified View of Pull Production Systems

  • Yacob Khojasteh
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

The operation and control characteristics of some control policies from basic to hybrid ones are described in this chapter. Basic control policies include Kanban, CONWIP, and Base-stock. The simplest is the CONWIP, which has only a single control parameter for the entire production line, whereas Kanban and Base-stock controls require one control parameter for each production stage. Hybrid control policies include Kanban-CONWIP, Generalized Kanban, and Extended Kanban. Among the hybrid controls, we only describe the simplest one, the CONWIP-Kanban, which requires one control parameter for each production stage and one additional parameter for the entire production line.

Keywords

Control Policy Production Stage Output Buffer Demand Information Kanban System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Buzacott, J. A. (1989). Queuing models of kanban and MRP controlled production systems. Engineering Cost and Production Economics, 17, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dallery, Y., & Liberopoulos, G. (2000). Extended kanban control system: Combining kanban and base stock. IIE Transactions, 32, 369–386.Google Scholar
  3. Gstettner, S., & Kuhn, H. (1996). Analysis of production control systems kanban and CONWIP. International Journal of Production Research, 34(11), 3253–3274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2008). Factory physics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Huang, Y., Kuriger, G., & Chen, F. F. (2013). Simulation studies of hybrid pull systems of kanban and conwip in an assembly line. In A. Azevedo (Ed.), Advances in sustainable and competitive manufacturing systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Lee, Y.-J., & Zipkin, P. (1992). Tandem queues with planned inventories. Operations Research, 40(5), 936–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lödding, H. (2013). Hybrid Kanban/CONWIP control. In H. Lödding (Ed.), Handbook of manufacturing control. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Muckstadt, J. A., & Tayur, S. R. (1995). A comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms: I, background and structural results. IIE Transactions, 27(1), 140–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sato, R., & Praehofer, H. (1997). A discrete event model of business system – A systems theoretic foundation for information systems analysis: Part 1. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 27(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Spearman, M. L., Woodruff, D. L., & Hopp, W. J. (1990). CONWIP: A pull alternative to Kanban. International Journal of Production Research, 23, 879–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yacob Khojasteh
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Global StudiesSophia UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations