Advertisement

The Depopulation Problem

  • Kiyoko HagiharaEmail author
  • Yoshimi Hagihara
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 4)

Abstract

The depopulation problem in Japan is considered from the viewpoint of local public goods equilibrium. If in moving from one region to another migrants do not account for the effect of their moving on the other residents, then one region may be overpopulated and the other underpopulated. In the framework of a simple model, it is suggested that the central government may be justified in using a system of intergovernmental grants to overcome these inefficiencies. In order to confirm the role of intergovernmental grants, the model is applied to a village which is designated as a depopulated area. Furthermore, the effects of the countermeasures taken for about 40 years since the first depopulation law was implemented are investigated. In the final section, it is pointed out that there is a need to take into account another situation: there are areas which are similar to depopulated areas, but are not designated as such under the law.

Keywords

Depopulation problem Intergovernmental grants Migration Inefficiency of population allocation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments on earlier drafts by S. Mahay, W. Jarvie, M. M. Hufschmidt, and F. H. Bollman. A part of this chapter has originally published in Regional Studies, 25(2), pp. 163–172. We would like to thank the publishers for their permission to use the material here.

References

  1. Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). Lectures on public economics. Maidenhead, Berks: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Boadway, R., & Flatters, F. (1982). Efficiency and equalization in a federal system of government: A synthesis and extension of recent results. Canadian Journal of Economics, 15, 613–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J. M., & Goetz, C. J. (1972). Efficiency limits of fiscal mobility: An assessment of the Tiebout model. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. W. (1970). Efficiency basis for federal fiscal equalization. In J. M. Margolis (Ed.), The analysis of public output (pp. 139–162). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Flatters, F. R., Henderson, J. V., & Mieszkowski, P. M. (1974). Public goods, efficiency and regional fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hagihara, K. (1985a). Kaso mondai no kezaigakuteki kousatu (An economic study of the depopulation problem). Studies in Regional Science, 15, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hagihara, K. (1985b). The role of intergovernmental grants for environmental problems. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 3, 439–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagihara, Y., & Hagihara, K. (1981). Project grant allocation process applied in sewerage planning. Water Resources Research, 17, 449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagihara, K., & Hagihara, Y. (1986). Pricing policies for conservation of water resources and environment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 4, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagihara, K., & Hagihara, Y. (1991). The role of intergovernmental grants in underpopulated regions. Regional Studies, 25(2), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartwick, J. M. (1980). The Henry George rule, optimal population and interregional equity. Journal of Public Economics, 13, 695–700.Google Scholar
  12. Mieszkowski, P., & Zodraw, G. R. (1989). Taxation and the Tiebout model: The differential effects of head taxes, taxes on land rents and property taxes. Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1,098–146.Google Scholar
  13. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication. (2014). Kaso taisaku no genkyou (The present state of measures for depopulation problem). http://www.soumu.go.jp/maincontent/000276127.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2014.
  14. Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). The theory of local public goods. In M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 274–333). London/New York: Macmillan/Wiley and Halsted Press.Google Scholar
  15. Stiglitz, J. E. (1983a). Public goods in open economies with heterogeneous individuals. In J.-F. Thisse & H. G. Zoller (Eds.), Locational analysis of public facilities (pp. 55–78). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  16. Stiglitz, J. E. (1983b). The theory of local public goods twenty-five years after Tiebout: A perspective. In G. R. Zodraw (Ed.), Local provision of public services: The Tiebout model after twenty-five years (pp. 17–53). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of SociologyBukkyo UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations