Advertisement

Water Resources Conflict Management: Social Risk Management

  • Yoshimi HagiharaEmail author
  • Kiyoko Hagihara
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 4)

Abstract

The global social risks of managing water resources are swiftly increasing. Managing water resources conflicts is the most essential and serious problem for the survival of human beings. Firstly, this chapter analyses water resources conflicts in Japan and abroad – especially the conflict between India and Bangladesh – the circumstances in these areas, and the reasons for the strife that afflicts them. With the aim of ensuring regional sustainability, the authors try to answer the question: ‘What is Sustainability?’, and show the need for a paradigm shift in water resources management amidst conditions of social inequality. Next, the chapter examines a meta-methodology for managing water resources conflicts, with a focus on the GES (Geo-, Eco- and Socio-) environment, a time-based circulation system of mid- and long-term environmental change, and an adaptive water resources planning. Finally, some examples of research are briefly introduced from three phases of meta-methodology, including ‘producing alternatives’, a multiple evaluation’ and ‘conflict management’.

Keywords

Water resourcesconflict management Social riskmanagement Sustainability Survivability GESenvironment 

References

  1. Barrow, M., & Clarke, T. (2002). Blue gold: The battle against the corporate theft of the world’s water. Toronto: Stoddart Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  4. Hagihara, Y. (2008). Adaptive system planning methodology for environment risk management. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  5. Hagihara, Y. (2009). Water resources conflict management, The Annals of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, No. 52A, pp. 81–101.Google Scholar
  6. Hagihara, Y., & Hagihara, K. (1977). Water resources allocation based on river state equations. Studies in Regional Science, 8, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hagihara, Y., & Hagihara, K. (1981). Project grant allocation process applied in sewerage planning. Water Resources Research, 17(3), 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagihara, K., & Hagihara, Y. (1991). The role of intergovernmental grants in underpopulated regions. Regional Studies, 25(2), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagihara, K., & Hagihara, Y. (2004). The role of environmental valuation in public policymaking; The case of waterside area in Japan. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagihara, Y., & Sakamoto, M. (2006). Conflict management: As water resources social risk. Tokyo: Keiso (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  11. Hagihara, Y., Hagihara, K., Nakagawa, Y., & Watanabe, H. (1981). A multi-objectives optimal water resources allocation process, IFAC 8th Triennial World Congress, PPCS-81-86.Google Scholar
  12. Hagihara, Y., Takahashi, K., & Hagihara, K. (1995). A methodology of spatial planning for waterside area. Studies in Regional Science, 25(2), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagihara, Y., Takahashi, K., & Hagihara, K. (1998). Waterside planning process in urban environment by systems analysis. Tokyo: Keiso (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mesarovic, M. D., Macko, D., & Takahara, Y. (1970). Theory of hierarchical, multilevel systems. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ohlsson, L. (1996). Hydropolitics: Conflicts over water as a development constraint. Dhaka: University Press of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  17. Pearce, F. (1992). The Dammed-river, dams, and the coming world crisis. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Postel, S. (1999). Pillar of sand: Can the irrigation miracle last? Washington, DC: World-Watch Institutes.Google Scholar
  19. Sakamoto, M., & Hagihara, Y. (2005). A study on social conflict management in a water resources development – A case of the conflict between India and Bangladesh over regulation of the Ganges river. Journal of Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources, 18(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sakamoto, M., & Hagihara, Y. (2006). Social stability and mathematical stability in conflict management. IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, pp. 5270–5274.Google Scholar
  21. Sakamoto, M., Hagihara, Y., & Sugiman, T. (2004). An attempt to develop a dynamic system model of social conflict by the combination of behaviour decision model and game theory. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 263–284. Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sakamoto, M., Hagihara, Y., & Hipel, W. K. (2005). Coordination process by a third party in the conflict between Bangladesh and India over regulation of Ganges River, 2005. IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, pp. 1119–1125.Google Scholar
  23. Sato, Y. (2008). Consensual alternatives evaluation under the conflict between river basin development and environment (in Japanese). Doctoral dissertation, Kyoto University.Google Scholar
  24. Sato, Y., & Hagihara Y. (2003). Decision-making system under the conflict situation between water resources development and environmental conservation. Proceeding of the 3rd DPRI-IIASA international symposium on Integrated disaster risk management, [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
  25. Stone, P. J. (1980). A systems approach to water resource allocation in international river basin development. Water Resources Research, 16(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watanabe, H., & Hagihara, Y. (1993). Planning and management of water resources systems. Journal of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, SI-3, 219–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.School of SociologyBukkyo UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations