Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to investigate the dynamics of business ecosystems, which are a special form of industrial cluster characterized by diversity of firms, complex relationships among them, and the presence of platform firms. Such characteristics come from network effects. Firms often set open standards to trigger network effects that are advantageous for their business models. Among them, platform firms, which strategically use the open standards and make the most of the network effects in relation to their business models, play a special role in business ecosystems, because their strategic behavior contributes not only to increasing their market presence but also to the expansion of the ecosystem by stimulating the entry of newcomer firms.
To predict the dynamics of business ecosystems, we should try to understand how product architecture influences firm collaboration within them and characterizes their industrial structures. Open-modular systems, such as PCs, tend to modify their industries and turn them into business ecosystems, whereas closed-integral systems, such as automobiles, yield an industrial form called cohesive clique. Owing to the linkages between architecture and industrial cluster, changes in architecture lead to actual changes in industrial clusters.
Two main factors have recently been affecting product architecture, i.e., digitalization and globalization. Digitalization works as a trigger for architectural change, and globalization acts as its amplifier, which means that products whose architectures have seemed stable for years might drastically change. A slight change in architecture often causes the industrial structure to quickly transform from a cohesive clique into a business ecosystem, which naturally causes changes in the profitability and competitiveness of firms. Faced with these architectural dynamics, each firm needs to thoroughly understand the connections between product architecture and industrial cluster.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aoki M (2001) Towards a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg Manag J 21:345–367
Eisenmann T et al (2011) Platform envelopment. Strateg Manag J 32:1270–1285
Evans DS et al (2006) Invisible engines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Fujimoto T (2007) Architecture-based comparative advantage: a design information view of manufacturing. Evol Inst Econ Rev 4:55–112
Gabriel R (1989) The rise of “Worse is Better”. https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html. Accessed 9 Apr 2018
Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform leadership: how Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Grove AS (1996) Only the paranoid survive. Doubleday Business, New York
Iansiti M, Levien R (2004a) The keystone advantage: what the new business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Iansiti M, Levien R (2004b) Strategy as ecology. Harv Bus Rev 82. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025570
Kawakami M (2007) Competing for complementarity: growth of Taiwanese notebook PC manufacturers as ODM suppliers. In: Sato Y, Kawakami M (eds) Competition and cooperation among Asian enterprises in China. Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba. http://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Download/Report/2006/pdf/2006_04_30_04.pdf
Nalebuff B (2004) Bundling as an entry barrier. Q J Econ 119(1):159–187
Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75
Rochet J, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029
Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Tatsumoto H (2017) Platform kigyou no global senryaku, Yuhikaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Tatsumoto H et al (2009) Platforms and the international division of labor: a case study on Intel’s platform business in the PC industry. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 345–369
The Economist (2017) Data is giving rise to a new economy. The Economist, Fuel of the Future May 6, 2017. Available at https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21721634-how-it-shaping-updata-giving-rise-new-economy
Ulrich KT (1995) Product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 24:419–440
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by KAKEN Grant Number JP16K03850.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tatsumoto, H. (2018). Evolution of Business Ecosystems. In: Fujimoto, T., Ikuine, F. (eds) Industrial Competitiveness and Design Evolution. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 12. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55145-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55145-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55144-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55145-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)