Skip to main content

Evolution of Business Ecosystems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Industrial Competitiveness and Design Evolution

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science ((EESCS,volume 12))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to investigate the dynamics of business ecosystems, which are a special form of industrial cluster characterized by diversity of firms, complex relationships among them, and the presence of platform firms. Such characteristics come from network effects. Firms often set open standards to trigger network effects that are advantageous for their business models. Among them, platform firms, which strategically use the open standards and make the most of the network effects in relation to their business models, play a special role in business ecosystems, because their strategic behavior contributes not only to increasing their market presence but also to the expansion of the ecosystem by stimulating the entry of newcomer firms.

To predict the dynamics of business ecosystems, we should try to understand how product architecture influences firm collaboration within them and characterizes their industrial structures. Open-modular systems, such as PCs, tend to modify their industries and turn them into business ecosystems, whereas closed-integral systems, such as automobiles, yield an industrial form called cohesive clique. Owing to the linkages between architecture and industrial cluster, changes in architecture lead to actual changes in industrial clusters.

Two main factors have recently been affecting product architecture, i.e., digitalization and globalization. Digitalization works as a trigger for architectural change, and globalization acts as its amplifier, which means that products whose architectures have seemed stable for years might drastically change. A slight change in architecture often causes the industrial structure to quickly transform from a cohesive clique into a business ecosystem, which naturally causes changes in the profitability and competitiveness of firms. Faced with these architectural dynamics, each firm needs to thoroughly understand the connections between product architecture and industrial cluster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aoki M (2001) Towards a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg Manag J 21:345–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann T et al (2011) Platform envelopment. Strateg Manag J 32:1270–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS et al (2006) Invisible engines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto T (2007) Architecture-based comparative advantage: a design information view of manufacturing. Evol Inst Econ Rev 4:55–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel R (1989) The rise of “Worse is Better”. https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html. Accessed 9 Apr 2018

  • Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform leadership: how Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove AS (1996) Only the paranoid survive. Doubleday Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti M, Levien R (2004a) The keystone advantage: what the new business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti M, Levien R (2004b) Strategy as ecology. Harv Bus Rev 82. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025570

  • Kawakami M (2007) Competing for complementarity: growth of Taiwanese notebook PC manufacturers as ODM suppliers. In: Sato Y, Kawakami M (eds) Competition and cooperation among Asian enterprises in China. Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba. http://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Download/Report/2006/pdf/2006_04_30_04.pdf

  • Nalebuff B (2004) Bundling as an entry barrier. Q J Econ 119(1):159–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet J, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsumoto H (2017) Platform kigyou no global senryaku, Yuhikaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsumoto H et al (2009) Platforms and the international division of labor: a case study on Intel’s platform business in the PC industry. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 345–369

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2017) Data is giving rise to a new economy. The Economist, Fuel of the Future May 6, 2017. Available at https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21721634-how-it-shaping-updata-giving-rise-new-economy

  • Ulrich KT (1995) Product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 24:419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by KAKEN Grant Number JP16K03850.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirofumi Tatsumoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tatsumoto, H. (2018). Evolution of Business Ecosystems. In: Fujimoto, T., Ikuine, F. (eds) Industrial Competitiveness and Design Evolution. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 12. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55145-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics