Abstract
The communities in the Indian sub-continent have learnt to live with disasters. The Indian subcontinent has been stuck by massive natural disasters in the recent decades. The catastrophic supper cyclone in Odisha in 1999 was followed by mega earth quakes in 2001 and 2005 in Gujarat and Kashmir respectively. The visual impact of the live coverage of tragedy caused by Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004, was fresh in the memory of people in the sub continent until they witnessed the Indus river floods in Pakistan in 2010 that devastated lives and livelihoods of over 20 million people. The memories of tragic Indus floods were taken over by multi-hazard disaster in Uttarakhand in the summer of 2013 at about 3,583 m (11,755 ft) above sea level, dubbed by the media as “Himalayan Tsunami”.
From Indian Ocean Tsunami to Himalayan Tsunami, the constant feature in the aftermath of all disasters is that communities have been the first responders and communities are the ones to stay back in the area to deal with future hazards with new wisdom and enhanced resilience. But the question is, are we (non-government organizations, donors, government agencies, research institutions, etc.) listening to the communities or are we interested only in telling what communities should do to deal with disasters?
The chapters discusses the comparison and difference between the concept of participatory appraisal and listening to communities. The chapter suggests that, listening to communities is much more than mere consultation and participation and it implies looking at the issues from community’s perspective and having pure & objective understanding of issues that are context specific. While development professionals can be trained to become ‘experts in participation’, listening to communities requires development workers to undergo a mentoring to improve thinking and behavior and it must be promoted as an attitude alongside with participatory tools and approaches.
Taking Indian Ocean Tsunami as an example, this chapter discusses the role of communities from first response to the last action in the aftermath of massive disasters (like Indian Ocean Tsunami). Based on field experiences and a set of researches that inquired the issues of gender and social inclusiveness, participation, HIV AIDS, accountability, shelter and risk reduction, in the Tsunami affected areas of India and Sri Lanka, this chapter analyze the impacts of Tsunami response as a result of listening to communities or lack of it. The chapter will high light the role of local knowledge, capacity, and priorities of communities in effective disaster response and its sustainability and calls for greater attention to empathetic listening among humanitarian workers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akinci F (2004) The aftermath of disaster in urban areas: an evaluation of the 1999 earthquake in Turkey. Cities 21(6):527–536
Atwater E (1992) I hear you (Rev ed). Walker, Pacific Grove
Bourbé L (2010) Identification of vulnerable people in urban environments. In: Assessment of sustainable livelihoods and urban vulnerabilities. ACF International, Paris, Cap Impression Press, Palaiseau
CEE (2008) Threads of disaster management: weaving youth experiences from tsunami response in to a learning document. Center for Environment Education, p 30. Ahmadabad, India, ISBN 978-81-89587-38-3
Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev 22(7):953–969
Cooke B, Kothari U (2001) The case for participation as tyranny. In: Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) Participation: the new tyranny? Zed Books, London, pp 1–15
Covey S (1989) The 7 habits if highly effective people. Simon & Schuster Inc., New York
Fritz Institute (2005) Lessons from tsunami: top line findings. www.fritzinstitute.org. Accessed Dec 15 2013
Hilhorst D (2002) Being good at doing good? Quality and accountability of humanitarian NGOs. Disasters 26(3):193–212
Hollifield M, Hewage C, Gunawardena CN, Kodituwakku P, Bopagoda K, Weerarathnege K (2008) Symptoms and coping in Sri Lanka 20-21 months after the 2004 tsunami. Br J Psychiatry 192:39–44
Indurfurth AKF, Fabrycki D, Cohen S (2005) The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, six month report. The Sigur Center Asia Papers, Sigur Center for Asian Studies, vol 7, George Washington University
Krishna H (2005a) Field note, post Tsunami needs assessment, Oxfam, Chennai, India (2 January 2005)
Krishna H (2005b) Field note, post Tsunami needs assessment, Oxfam, Chennai, India (30 June, 2005)
Minear L, Weiss TG (1993) Humanitarian action in times of war: a handbook for practitioners. Boulder Lynne Rienner (Also available in Spanish and French from UNICEF, New York)
Murphy BL (2007) Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management. Nat Hazards 41:297–315
Nakagawa Y, Shaw R (2004) Social capital: a missing link to disaster recovery’. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 22(1):5–34
Oxfam and Loyola (2006) Rapid assessment of temporary shelters for tsunami victims, an unpublished report. Oxfam International, Chennai, India
Oxfam International (2006) Oxfam International Tsunami fund, second year report, vol 17. December 2006, Oxford, UK
Oxfam International (2009) Lessons from the Oxfam International tsunami research program. Oxfam International, Oxford, p. 4
Oxfam and BEDROCK (2009) Building local capacities for disaster response and risk reduction. BEROCK for DFYWA, Chennai, India
Oxfam and Swasti Health Resource Center (2008) Reducing vulnerability to HIV before and after disasters: a research brief. Oxfam International, Oxford
Pincha C (2008) Indian Ocean tsunami through the gender lens. Oxfam International, p 21. Chennai, India ISBN 81-86945-21-0
Pincha C, Krishna H (2008) Aravani’s: voiceless victims of the tsunami. Humanitarian Exchange Magazine, Issue 41, Humanitarian Practitioners Network, ODI, London, UK
Pincha C, Krishna HN (2009) Post disaster Ex Gratia payments and their gendered impacts. Regional Development Dialogue (RDD), vol 30, issue 1, Spring 2009, Gender and Disaster Management, p 95, Tokyo, Japan
Practitioners. Lynne Rienner, London
Sainath P (2012) In 16 years, farm suicides cross a quarter million. The Hindu, English Daily, 27 May, 2012
Sanderson D (2012) Building livelihoods of the most marginalised in urban areas: strategic approaches from Dhaka. In: Burnell J, Sanderson D (eds) Environmental hazards, vol 2, issue 11. Earthscan, London
Shaw R, Goda K (2004) From disaster to sustainable civil society: the Kobe experience. Disasters 28(1):16–40
Swasti and Oxfam International (2009) Did the tsunami increase the vulnerability of coastal communities to HIV? Catalyst Management Services, Bengaluru, India, ISBN 978-81-908417-1-9
Tsunami (2004) Tsunami, 2004, facts and figures. http://www.tsunami2004.net/tsunami-2004-facts/
UNFPA (2005) Gender based violence in Aceh, Indonesia. United Nations Population Fund, A Case Study, p 12, ISBN 0-8971-4-828-2
Vaux T (2001) The selfish Altruist: relief work in famine and war. Earthscan, London, ISBN-1849774307
WDR-World Disasters Report: Focus on HIV AIDS (2008) The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, ISBN-92-9139-134-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nibanupudi, H.K., Choudhury, P.R. (2015). Listening to the Communities. In: Shaw, R. (eds) Recovery from the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55117-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55117-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55116-4
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55117-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)