Skip to main content

Can We Explain German and French Trajectories in the 2000s by Their Institutional Setting During Fordism?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolving Diversity and Interdependence of Capitalisms

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science ((EESCS,volume 11))

  • 453 Accesses

Abstract

A common explanation to German economic success for 10 years has been its ability to reform its labour institutions: from 1990, the percentage of firms abiding by the traditional sectoral contracting wage-setting system decreased significantly, allowing new firms to pay lower wages. This increasing heterogeneity of firms would explain, to some extent, the rising wage inequality observed in Germany for 25 years (Dustmann et al. 2009; Card et al. 2013). The Hartz laws (2003–2005) were also supposed to strengthen labour market flexibility by reducing reservation wage and implementing active labour market policy, by creating mini-jobs, etc. (Eichhorst and Marx 2009. The adoption of working time accounts also allowed to adjust employment volume by working hours rather than hiring and firing (Burda and Hunt 2011; Blot et al. 2015). This widespread set of reforms implemented by Germany would explain how Germany managed to cross the subprime crises without lasting fall of employment. This success also contrasts with “sclerotic” French economy, unable, according to many economists, to evolve so as to take globalization constraints into account and to reform its institutions (Hairault 2015) or to promote trust and cooperation (Aghion et al. 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghion P, Algan Y, Cahuc P, Shleifer A (2010) Regulation and distrust. Q J Econ 125(3):1015–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke B (2005) The global saving glut and the U.S. current account deficit. The Federal Reserve Board, remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke at the Sandridge Lecture, Virginia Association of Economists, Richmond, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Blot C, Chagny O, Le Bayon S (2015) Faut-il suivre le modèle allemand ? La documentation française, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bofinger P (2016) German macroeconomics: the long shadow of Walter Eucken. VoxEU, 9th of June

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S, Boyer R (1995) Wages, aggregate demand, and employment in an open economy: an empirical investigation. In: Epstein GA, Gintis HM (eds) Macroeconomic policy after the conservative era. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer R (2018) Two Dialectics between Polity and Economy: European and Asian Integration Processes Compared, contribution in the present book

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer R, Juillard M (1992) The new endogenous growth theory versus a productivity regime approach: one century of American economic history revisited. Couverture Orange n° 9210, CEPREMAP

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda M, Hunt J (2011) What explains the German labor market miracle in the great recession? Brook Pap Econ Act 42(1):273–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero RJ, Farhi E, Gourinchas P-O (2016) Safe asset scarcity and aggregate demand. Am Econ Rev 106(5):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors L, Driffill J (1988) Bargaining structure, corporatism and macroeconomic performance. Econ Policy 3(6):13–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canry N (2005) Régime wage-led, régime profit-led et cycles: un modèle. Écon Appl 58(1):143–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Card D, Heining J, Kline P (2013) Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Q J Econ 128(3):967–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin W, Soskice D (2009) German economic performance: disentangling the role of supply-side reforms, macroeconomic policy and coordinated economy institutions. Soc Econ Rev 7:67–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann C, Ludsteck J, Schönberg U (2009) Revisiting the German wage structure. Q J Econ 124(2):843–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann C, Fitzenberger B, Schönberg U, Spitz-Oener A (2014) From sick man of Europe to economic superstar: Germany’s resurgent economy. J Econ Perspect 28(1):167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorst W, Marx P (2009) Reforming German Labor Market Institutions: a dual path to flexibility. IZA discussion paper n° 4100

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi J-P (1995) Le débat interdit. Arléa, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin RM (1967) A growth cycle. In: Feinstein CH (ed) Capitalism and economic growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairault J-O (2015) Ce modèle social que le monde ne nous envie plus. Albin Michel, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann R, Ratto M, Roeger W, In’t Veld J, Vogel L (2014) What drives the German current account? And how does it affect other EU member states? Economic Papers n° 516. European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice D, Iversen T (2005) The nonneutrality of monetary policy with large price or wage setters. Q J Econ 115(1):265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers LH (2015) Demand side secular stagnation. Am Econ Rev 105(5):60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Canry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Canry, N. (2018). Can We Explain German and French Trajectories in the 2000s by Their Institutional Setting During Fordism?. In: Boyer, R., Uemura, H., Yamada, T., Song, L. (eds) Evolving Diversity and Interdependence of Capitalisms. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 11. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55001-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics