Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgery: Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • 1095 Accesses

Abstract

Technical advancements and development of endoscopic equipment in thoracoscopic surgery have resulted in increase in the popularity of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). To date, a number of single-institution studies and several meta-analyses have demonstrated acceptable short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, and the outcomes are comparable to those of conventional open esophagectomy (OE). Extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy including the upper mediastinal nodes along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) is considered as a standard surgery for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan. Nowadays, precise upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy along the bilateral RLNs is also feasible, even with thoracoscopic approaches. However, there have been a limited number of prospective multicenter trials to verify the feasibility and benefits of MIE to date. Comparison of the left lateral decubitus position with the prone position also should be assessed as appropriate positioning for MIE, with regard to precise upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy along the bilateral RLNs for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the oncological benefit to patients undergoing MIE has not been scientifically proven because there have been no randomized controlled trials to verify the equivalency in long-term survival of patients undergoing MIE compared with that of patients undergoing OE. If future prospective studies indicate oncological benefits, MIE could truly become the standard care for patients with esophageal cancer.

Although several studies have emphasized that robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy is safe and feasible, the superiority of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy compared with conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy should be carefully evaluated because robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy is not comparable with conventional MIE in terms of the cost of a surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y et al (2000) Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 232:225–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H et al (1994) Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 220:364–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishihira T, Hirayama K, Mori S (1998) A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Am J Surg 175:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K (1991) Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 48:411–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y (2013) Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46(4):241–248

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:7–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K et al (1999) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 13:218–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA et al (2000) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70:906–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Lemoine PH et al (2001) Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 72:593–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N et al (1996) Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1533–1540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nation-wide web-based database. Ann Surg, in press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shichinose T, Hirano S, Kondo S (2008) Video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 38:206–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadanaga N, Kuwano H, Watanabe M, Ikebe M, Mori M, Maekawa S et al (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery: a new technique for transhiatal esophageal dissection. Am J Surg 168:355–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen TN, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248:1081–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kernstein KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, Van Natta TL, Campos JC, Yoder MR et al (2004) The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1847–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Inaba K, Kanaya S, Teramukai S et al (2012) Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 36:1608–1616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu HP, Chang CH, Lin PJ, Chang JP (1995) Video-assisted endoscopic esophagectomy with stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. World J Surg 19:745–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarahi R, Rajan PS et al (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fabian T, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, Federico JA (2007) Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1667–1670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Watanabe M, Baba Y, Nagai Y, Baba H (2013) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an updated review. Surg Today 43:237–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A et al (2013) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc 17:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarral OA, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Hanna GB, Zacharakis E (2012) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Surg Endosc 26:2095–2103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeuchi H, Oyama T, Saikawa Y, Kitagawa Y (2012) Novel thoracoscopic intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis technique for patients with esophageal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:88–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H et al (2014) Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg 38(2):410–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takeuchi H, Fujii H, Ando N et al (2009) Validation study of radio-guided sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 249:757–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T et al (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bumm R, Holscher AH, Feussner H, Tachibana M, Bartels H, Siewert JR (1993) Endodissection of the thoracic esophagus: technique and clinical results in transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg 218:97–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bernabe KQ, Bolton JS, Richardson WS (2005) Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: a case–control study. Surg Endosc 19:334–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Avital S, Zundel N, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R (2005) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 190:69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tangoku A, Yoshino S, Abe T, Hayashi H, Satou T, Ueno T et al (2004) Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:383–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL (2011) Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 28:29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T, Yamamoto S, Maekawa T (2006) Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1083–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, Zhao Y (2011) Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Intract Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 12:366–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Kataoka Y et al (2012) Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complication and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:381–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dantoc M, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 147:768–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P et al (2012) Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England. Ann Surg 255:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Biere SSA, Cuesta MA, Van Del Peet DL (2009) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 64:121–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A et al (2010) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: metaanalysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 55:3031–3040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Luketich J, Pennathur A, Catalano PJ, Swanson SJ, de Hoyos AL, Maddaus MA et al (2009) Results of a phase II multicenter study of minimally invasive esophagectomy (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2202). Proceeding of ASCO Annual Meeting 2009, Abstract No. 4516. J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 4516)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

    Hiroya Takeuchi

Authors
  1. Hiroya Takeuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroya Takeuchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

    Nobutoshi Ando

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Takeuchi, H. (2015). Surgery: Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. In: Ando, N. (eds) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54977-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54977-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54976-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54977-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation