Advertisement

Innovating in Practices

  • Tiziana Russo-SpenaEmail author
  • Cristina Mele
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 6)

Abstract

This work builds on a practice-based approach to offer a fresh understanding of innovation. The authors address innovation not simply as an outcome but as something actors do: a practice in terms of a collective doing that connects knowledgeable actors. The term ‘innovating’, rather than ‘innovation’, reflects the dynamic aspect of the phenomenon. Innovating is thus conceptualised as a texture of practices that seamlessly interweave relationships and actions. It emerges through two collective practices performed by multiple actor-to-actor interactions: networking and knowing.

Keywords

Innovation Practices Knowing Networking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Silvia Gherardi for her valuable comments on the paper.

References

  1. Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callon, M. (1999). Le reseau comme forme émergente et comme modalité de coordination. In M. Callon, P. Cohendet, J.-M. Dalle, F. Eymard-Duvernay, D. Foray, & E. Schenk (Eds.), Reseau et Coordination (pp. 13–64). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  5. Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16(4), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, R. G. (1988). The new product process: A decision guide for management. Journal of Marketing Management, 3(3), 238–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing practices in services: Capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dougherty, D., & Dunne, D. D. (2012). Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1467–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  12. Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2013). A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in SD logic and service system. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(1), 19–31.Google Scholar
  14. Ellström, P.-E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1 / 2), 27–40.Google Scholar
  15. Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gherardi, S. (2001). From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations, 54, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden: Blackwell Publ.Google Scholar
  18. Gherardi, S. (2009). Community of practice or practices of a community. In The Sage handbook of management learning, education, and development (pp. 514–530). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gherardi, S. (2012a). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise. In S. Gherardi & A. Strati (Eds.), Learning and knowing in practice-based studies. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Gherardi, S. (2012b). Why do practices change and why do they persist? Models of explanations. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning, professional and practice-based learn. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2003). The sociological foundations of organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Kahler, M. (Ed.). (2009). Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Korkman, O., Storbacka, K., & Harald, B. (2010). Practices as markets: Value co-creation in e-invoicing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18, 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lave, J. C., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant (S-D) logic perspective. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175.Google Scholar
  27. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mele, C., & Russo Spena, T. (2015a). Eco-innovation practices. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2(28), 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mele, C., & Russo Spena, T. (2015b). Innomediary agency and practices in shaping market innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 44(1), 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mele, C., Colurcio, M., & Russo Spena, T. (2014). Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 26(4), 612–642.Google Scholar
  31. Melkas, H., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2012). Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Michel, S., Brown, S., & Gallan, A. S. (2008). Service-logic innovations: How to innovate customers, not products. California Management Review, 50(3), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.). (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
  35. Nooteboom, B. (2012). A pragmatist theory of innovation. In H. Melkas & V. Harmaakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant-logic lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2008). Networks and institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Rouse, J. (2002). How scientific practices matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Russo Spena, T., & Mele, C. (2012). Five Co-s’ in innovating: A practice-based view. Journal of Service Management, 23(4), 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Russo-Spena, T., Mele, C. (2012b). Creativity and learning in the practices of service innovation in advances. In J.C. Spohrer, Freund L. E. (Eds.), Human factors and service engineering. USA: CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  42. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Schatzki, T. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organizations Studies, 26(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73, 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schumpeter, J. (1912). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Swan, J., & Scarborough, H. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations, 58(7), 913–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swan, J. A., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of communities of practice in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., & Robertson, M. (2007). The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations, 60(12), 1809–1837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  55. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wenger, E. (2003). Communities of practice and social learning systems. In S. Nicolini, D. Gherardi, & Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 76–99). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  57. Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centered interview, Forum: Qualitative social research. http://qualitative-research.net/fqs

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations