Advertisement

Zooming Out and Zooming In: Service Ecosystems as Venues for Collaborative Innovation

  • Heiko WielandEmail author
  • Stephen L. Vargo
  • Melissa Archpru Akaka
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 6)

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide a perspective that extends the process of innovation beyond firm activities and new product development. We apply an S-D logic, service ecosystems framework to reframe the context of innovation to include collaboration and social structures (i.e., institutions and institutional arrangements) that guide and are guided by the actions and interactions among multiple actors. Using this framework, we show that market innovation does not automatically occur when actors (e.g., firms) or groups of actors (e.g., innovation networks) introduce new ideas or products, but instead when new practices become institutionalized as solutions. Institutionalization, in this context, is a nonlinear process in which systemic actors engage in institutional work and cocreate institutions through multiple iterations of institutional developments until common templates emerge that reflect imperfectly shared conceptions of problems and solutions. More specifically, we argue that technological innovation can be viewed as the cocreation of new value propositions. Market innovation, on the other hand, is driven by and drives the development of new technologies but also requires the acceptance of value propositions as well as the continued exchange, interpretation, integration, and application of a particular technology among multiple actors, over time (i.e., institutionalization).

Keywords

Market innovation Technological innovation Institutions Ecosystems Service-dominant logic 

References

  1. Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior: A functionalist theory of marketing. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  2. Araujo, L., & Spring, M. (2006). Services, products, and the institutional structure of production. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndt, J. (1981). The political economy of marketing systems: Reviving the institutional approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 1(2), 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Boston: Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callon, M. (Ed.). (1998). The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Carson, S. J., Devinney, T. M., Dowling, G. R., & John, G. (1999). Understanding institutional designs within marketing value systems. The Journal of Marketing, 63, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Constantin, J., & Lusch, R. F. (1994). Understanding resource management. Oxford: The Planning Forum.Google Scholar
  14. Coombs, R., & Miles, I. (2000). Innovation, measurement and services: The new problematique. Economics of Science Technology and Innovation, 18, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Creed, W. E. D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiMaggio, P. J. (Ed.). (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  17. Edvardsson, B., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Tronvoll, B., McHugh, P., & Windahl, C. (2014). Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6), 897–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gourville, J. T. (2005). The curse of innovation: A theory of why innovative new products fail in the marketplace. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  21. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffin, A. (1997). Pdma research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(6), 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (Eds.). (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  24. Harrison, D., & Kjellberg, H. (2010). Segmenting a market in the making: Industrial market segmentation as construction. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 784–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinings, C., & Tolbert, P. S. (2008). Organizational institutionalism and sociology: A reflection. In The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 473–490). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Humphreys, A. (2010). Megamarketing: The creation of markets as a social process. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C. F. (2006). Multiple versions of markets: Multiplicity and performativity in market practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 839–855.Google Scholar
  29. Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C.-F. (2007). On the nature of markets and their practices. Marketing Theory, 7(2), 137–162.Google Scholar
  30. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.). (2006). Institutions and institutional work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mele, C., Pels, J., & Storbacka, K. (2014). A holistic market conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 1–15.Google Scholar
  35. Möller, K., & Rajala, A. (2007). Rise of strategic nets – new modes of value creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 895–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking of the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory and Society, 37(5), 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14, 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schau, H. J., Muniz, A. M., Jr., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.Google Scholar
  45. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Slater, D. (2002). Capturing markets from the economists. Cultural Economy, pp. 59–77.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  48. Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2012). Value cocreation and service systems (Re)formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Science, 4(3), 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004, January). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 61–17Google Scholar
  50. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic; Further evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2b … and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2013). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Ischia: Naples Forum on Service.Google Scholar
  53. Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Venkatesh, A., Penaloza, L., & Firat, F. (Eds.). (2006). The market as a sign system and the logic of the market. Armonk/New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  55. von Hippel, E. (2007). Horizontal innovation network – by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wieland, H., Polese, F., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). Toward a service (Eco)systems perspective on value creation. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 3(3), 12–25.Google Scholar
  58. Zietsma, C., & McKnight, B. (Eds.). (2009). Building the iron cage: Institutional creation work in the context of competing proto-institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heiko Wieland
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephen L. Vargo
    • 2
  • Melissa Archpru Akaka
    • 3
  1. 1.California State UniversitySeasideUSA
  2. 2.University of Hawai’i at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.University of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations